Shed builder with bowel cancer dismissed on the spot: default judgment leads to £10,610 award
A part-time shed builder with bowel cancer was told he hadn't 'a fucking days' work' in him and dismissed. The tribunal awarded £10,610 after the employer failed to defend the claim.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #bowel-cancer
- #disability-discrimination
- #unfair-dismissal
- #injury-to-feelings
- #future-loss
- #default-judgment
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a part-time shed builder from 1 June 2014 until 13 August 2021.
- He was diagnosed with bowel cancer on 13 April 2020, which is a disability under the Equality Act 2010.
- The respondent dismissed the claimant without warning or medical advice, believing he was not fit to work.
- The respondent failed to file a response in time, leading to a default judgment on liability.
- The claimant was awarded £10,610 in total, including basic award, future loss, injury to feelings, and loss of statutory rights.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began working part-time as a shed builder for Hunt Sheds Ltd.
-
Bowel cancer diagnosis
Claimant was diagnosed with bowel cancer, which later was accepted as a disability.
-
Meeting about return to work
Claimant met with Mr Hunt to discuss returning to work; it was suggested to wait until stoma removal.
-
Dismissal
Claimant attended the respondent's premises to discuss returning to work; Mr Hunt told him he hadn't 'a fucking days' work' and dismissed him.
-
ACAS early conciliation started
Early conciliation with ACAS began.
-
ACAS early conciliation ended
Early conciliation concluded.
-
Claim form filed
Claimant filed a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
-
Notice of claim sent
Notice of claim was sent to the respondent, requiring a response by 3 February 2022.
-
Respondent's late response
Respondent filed their response, which was date-stamped received on 11 April 2022, outside the time limit.
-
Default judgment on liability
Default judgment was issued against the respondent for failing to file a response in time.
-
Remedy hearing
Employment Judge Postle held a remedy hearing to determine compensation.
-
Judgment issued
Judgment awarding £10,610 was issued.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide the amount of compensation for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination after the employer failed to file a response, resulting in a default judgment on liability.
The outcome
The tribunal awarded the claimant £10,610 in total.
- Basic award: £1,470 (for 7 years' service)
- Future loss of earnings: £3,640 (26 weeks after being fit to return)
- Injury to feelings: £5,000 (for the distress caused by the discrimination)
- Loss of statutory rights: £500
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must respond to tribunal claims within the strict 28-day deadline, or risk a default judgment on liability.
- Dismissing an employee with a disability without seeking medical advice or considering adjustments is likely to be both unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
- Claimants can pursue compensation for injury to feelings in disability discrimination cases, even without evidence of financial loss.
- Keeping in touch with your employer during sickness absence and providing fit notes can help show you were not abandoning your job.
A sudden dismissal after a cancer diagnosis
The claimant, a part-time shed builder with seven years' service, was diagnosed with bowel cancer in April 2020. He kept in touch with his employer, Hunt Sheds Limited, providing regular fit notes. In January 2021, he met with Mr Hunt to discuss returning to work, and it was suggested he wait until his stoma was removed. But when he attended the premises in August 2021 to talk about returning, Mr Hunt told him he hadn't 'a fucking days' work' in him and dismissed him on the spot.
The employer did not seek any medical advice or consider whether the claimant could work with adjustments. The tribunal later accepted that the claimant's bowel cancer was a disability under the Equality Act 2010, and that the dismissal was both unfair and an act of discrimination arising from disability.
What the employer could have done differently
Hunt Sheds Limited could have avoided this outcome by engaging with the claimant's situation properly. They could have obtained an occupational health report, considered temporary adjustments or a phased return, and followed a fair capability process. Instead, they dismissed him without warning, and then failed to respond to the tribunal claim on time, leading to a default judgment on liability. Even after the default judgment, they did not attend the remedy hearing or apply for reconsideration.
Why this case matters
This case shows that employers cannot simply dismiss an employee with a serious illness without proper process. It also highlights the importance of responding to tribunal claims promptly. For employees, it demonstrates that even if you are dismissed while off sick, you may have strong claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, and can recover compensation for injury to feelings as well as financial losses.
Similar cases
Default judgment leads to £37k award for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination
A former employee won over £37,000 after her employer failed to defend her claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The remedy was decided on the papers.
Nursery worker with disability unfairly dismissed and discriminated against
A nursery worker was unfairly dismissed and subjected to disability discrimination by Monkton Under 5 Playgroup. The tribunal awarded £27,676 in compensation, including £16,200 for injury to feelings.
Constructive dismissal after sexual harassment: default judgment and compensation
A former employee won a constructive dismissal and sexual harassment claim after their employer failed to respond to the tribunal claim. They were awarded £8,091.66 in compensation.
Welder with 20 years' service wins disability discrimination claim but has award reduced for failing to mitigate loss
A welder who resigned after his employer failed to make reasonable adjustments for his heart condition has won his unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims. The tribunal awarded £42,334 but reduced compensation because he turned down a job offer the day after leaving.
