Welder with 20 years' service wins disability discrimination claim but has award reduced for failing to mitigate loss
A welder who resigned after his employer failed to make reasonable adjustments for his heart condition has won his unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims. The tribunal awarded £42,334 but reduced compensation because he turned down a job offer the day after leaving.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- Mr Healey worked for Silo Services Ltd for 20 years as a welder.
- He suffered a heart attack and was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010.
- The respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments, including allowing micro breaks.
- Mr Healey resigned due to the discrimination and was constructively dismissed.
- He turned down a job offer the day after leaving and later became self-employed.
- The tribunal found he failed to mitigate his loss by not accepting the job offer.
Timeline
-
Employment ended
Mr Healey resigned from Silo Services Ltd due to disability discrimination and unfair dismissal.
-
Job offer received
Mr Healey telephoned a business in Oundle and was offered a welding job with similar pay, starting within two weeks.
-
Job offer declined
Mr Healey decided not to take the job due to additional travel and hours.
-
Became self-employed
Mr Healey started working as a self-employed welder.
-
Liability hearing began
The employment tribunal hearing commenced via CVP in Norwich.
-
Liability judgment given orally
The tribunal found that Mr Healey's claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination succeeded.
-
Remedy hearing
The tribunal heard evidence and submissions on remedy.
-
Remedy judgment
The tribunal issued a reserved judgment on remedy, awarding £42,334.00.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the welder was unfairly dismissed and subjected to disability discrimination due to the employer's failure to make reasonable adjustments, and what compensation should be awarded, taking into account his duty to mitigate his loss.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld the welder's claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. Silo Services Limited failed to make reasonable adjustments for his disability (a heart condition), which led to his resignation and constructive dismissal.
Compensation was broken down as follows:
- Basic award: £12,512
- Compensatory award (loss of statutory rights): £500
- Injury to feelings: £29,322
- Total: £42,334
The tribunal reduced the compensatory award for financial loss to nil because the welder failed to mitigate his loss by declining a job offer with similar pay the day after he resigned. He later became self-employed.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must make reasonable adjustments for disabled employees, such as allowing micro breaks, or risk discrimination claims.
- Employees who resign due to discrimination should consider accepting comparable job offers to avoid reductions in compensation for failure to mitigate loss.
- Length of service (20 years in this case) can influence the basic award but does not excuse a failure to mitigate.
- The ACAS Code of Practice may apply, but no uplift was awarded here as the employer's conduct was not found to be unreasonable in that respect.
A long-serving welder forced out by disability discrimination
This case shows how a failure to make simple adjustments can lead to a successful discrimination claim — but also how a claimant's own actions after leaving can significantly reduce their compensation. The welder, who had worked for Silo Services Limited for 20 years, suffered a heart attack and was disabled under the Equality Act 2010. The employer did not allow him micro breaks or other adjustments, and he felt he had no choice but to resign.
The tribunal found that this amounted to constructive unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. The employer's failure to accommodate his condition was the direct cause of his resignation. However, the tribunal also found that the welder had not done enough to limit his financial losses.
The cost of turning down a job offer
The day after he resigned, the welder was offered a welding job with similar pay at a business in Oundle. He turned it down because of additional travel and hours. The tribunal ruled that this was an unreasonable refusal to mitigate his loss. As a result, he received no compensatory award for financial loss beyond £500 for loss of statutory rights. His basic award of £12,512 and injury to feelings award of £29,322 were unaffected.
This is a reminder that employees who bring discrimination claims must take reasonable steps to find alternative work. Refusing a comparable job offer can be costly. The welder later became self-employed, but the gap between resignation and self-employment was not compensated because of the declined offer.
What this means for similar claims
For employers, the message is clear: failing to consider and implement reasonable adjustments for disabled staff can lead to liability for unfair dismissal and discrimination. For employees, the case highlights the importance of mitigating loss — even when you have a strong claim, you cannot simply turn down suitable work and expect full compensation.
Similar cases
Nursery worker with disability unfairly dismissed and discriminated against
A nursery worker was unfairly dismissed and subjected to disability discrimination by Monkton Under 5 Playgroup. The tribunal awarded £27,676 in compensation, including £16,200 for injury to feelings.
Pregnant employee dismissed without risk assessment: discrimination and unfair dismissal
A tribunal found that VPS PVT Limited unfairly dismissed a pregnant employee and discriminated against her by failing to carry out a health and safety risk assessment. The claimant was awarded £23,823.50 in compensation.
Dismissed without a meeting or appeal: a conduct case with big reductions
A former employee of Fairview Grocers Limited was unfairly dismissed without any meeting or right of appeal, but his own conduct led to a 60% cut in compensation. He was awarded £3,752.89 in total.
Dismissed without notice and discriminated against: a double blow for a former employee
A former employee was unfairly dismissed, wrongfully dismissed without notice, and discriminated against on grounds of sex. The tribunal awarded £16,208.68, including an uplift for the employer's failure to follow the ACAS code.
