Maths teacher dismissed for gross misconduct: unfair dismissal claim fails due to short service
A maths teacher with less than two years' service was dismissed for gross misconduct. The employment tribunal dismissed his unfair dismissal claim for lack of jurisdiction and found no race discrimination.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #race-discrimination
- #unfair-dismissal
- #wrongful-dismissal
- #gross-misconduct
- #flawed-grievance-process
- #flawed-disciplinary-process
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a Maths Teacher and KS5 Coordinator from 3 June 2019 to 30 April 2021.
- The claimant was dismissed summarily for gross misconduct after a disciplinary hearing on 21 April 2021.
- The claimant had less than two years' continuous service, so the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- The tribunal found no evidence that the claimant's race (Palestinian) was a factor in any of the treatment complained of.
- The claimant's grievances were investigated by an external investigator and the outcomes were upheld on appeal.
- The tribunal found the respondent had reasonable grounds to believe the claimant committed misconduct and acted fairly.
Timeline
-
Employment start date
Claimant started as a permanent Maths Teacher and KS5 Coordinator.
-
First lesson observation
Mr Jones and Mr Mashida observed a lesson and gave feedback; claimant was argumentative.
-
Meeting with Mr Jones
Meeting to discuss performance action plan; claimant felt unsympathetic treatment.
-
Sickness absence begins
Claimant went off sick with stress at work.
-
Return to work and invitation to apply for KS5 role
Mr San invited claimant to apply for his own post after deadline; claimant declined.
-
First formal grievance
Claimant raised grievance alleging race discrimination, bullying and harassment.
-
Grievance outcome
Grievance not upheld; claimant appealed.
-
Grievance appeal hearing
Appeal panel upheld the original decision.
-
Disciplinary hearing
Claimant dismissed summarily for gross misconduct.
-
Appeal against dismissal
Appeal not upheld.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed, whether he was subjected to race discrimination, harassment, and victimisation, and whether his dismissal was wrongful.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all claims. The unfair dismissal claim failed because the claimant had less than two years' service, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction. The race discrimination claims were dismissed because the tribunal found no evidence that race played any part in the treatment complained of. The wrongful dismissal claim also failed because the respondent had reasonable grounds to believe the claimant committed gross misconduct and followed a fair process.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employees with less than two years' service generally cannot claim unfair dismissal, unless the dismissal is for an automatically unfair reason.
- To succeed in a race discrimination claim, there must be evidence linking the treatment to the protected characteristic; a feeling of unfairness is not enough.
- A fair disciplinary process, with investigation and appeal, can protect an employer even if the employee disputes the allegations.
- Raising grievances does not automatically protect an employee from dismissal if there is genuine evidence of misconduct.
This case shows the limits of employment protection for short-serving employees. The claimant, a maths teacher and KS5 coordinator, was dismissed after less than two years for alleged gross misconduct. Because of his short service, the tribunal could not hear his unfair dismissal claim – a common barrier for new employees.
What the employer did right
The school investigated the allegations thoroughly, using an external investigator for the claimant's grievances. The disciplinary hearing was conducted, and the claimant was given a right of appeal. The tribunal found that the employer had reasonable grounds to believe misconduct occurred and acted fairly. This highlights how a robust process can defeat claims, even when the employee feels the decision was wrong.
Why the discrimination claims failed
The claimant, who is Palestinian, alleged that his race was a factor in various incidents – from lesson observations to the dismissal. However, the tribunal found no evidence to support this. The decision-makers were not motivated by race, and the claimant's own evidence did not show any racial animus. This is a reminder that discrimination claims require proof of a link between treatment and a protected characteristic, not just a sense of unfairness.
The case also underscores the importance of legal representation: the claimant represented himself, while the school had counsel. Although self-representation is possible, it can be challenging in complex discrimination cases. For employees considering similar claims, early legal advice is often crucial to assess the strength of the case and jurisdictional hurdles.
Similar cases
Healthcare consultant dismissed for gross misconduct after customer complaints: race discrimination claims rejected
A healthcare consultant with 6 years' service was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct following four customer complaints about his attitude. The tribunal also rejected his claims of race discrimination and victimisation.
Dismissed by email while on maternity leave: a conduct process that never happened
An account manager with 19 years' unblemished service was summarily dismissed by email while on maternity leave, with no investigation or disciplinary hearing. The tribunal awarded £37,310.
Bus driver dismissed for using phone while driving: insufficient service bars unfair dismissal claim
A bus driver with only 7 weeks' service was dismissed for gross misconduct after using his mobile phone while driving. The tribunal struck out his unfair dismissal and race discrimination claims.
Bank admin worker's race discrimination claim against NHS Trust dismissed
A Birmingham Employment Tribunal dismissed all claims of race discrimination and unfair dismissal brought by a former bank admin worker against University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, finding her allegations of a racist conspiracy involving over 30 people to be without evidence.