Dismissed by email while on maternity leave: a conduct process that never happened
An account manager with 19 years' unblemished service was summarily dismissed by email while on maternity leave, with no investigation or disciplinary hearing. The tribunal awarded £37,310.
2 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimant worked as an Account Manager for 19 years with an unblemished record.
- She was dismissed by email on 2 May 2023 for alleged gross misconduct while on maternity leave.
- No disciplinary process or investigation was carried out before dismissal.
- The claimant had raised issues about incorrect maternity pay and holiday pay before dismissal.
- The employer failed to provide written particulars of employment.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began working for the respondent as an Account Manager.
-
Minimum wage increase
Claimant expected wage increase to £9.50/hr but was underpaid.
-
Childbirth and maternity leave start
Claimant gave birth to her second child and began maternity leave.
-
Intended return to work
Claimant intended to return to work but was not permitted.
-
Dismissal
Claimant was dismissed by email for alleged gross misconduct.
-
Appeal request
Claimant requested an appeal, which was ignored.
-
Claim presented
Claimant presented her claim to the Employment Tribunal.
-
Hearing
The tribunal hearing took place by CVP.
-
Judgment
Judgment was issued in favour of the claimant.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to pregnancy and maternity discrimination when she was dismissed by email for alleged gross misconduct without any investigation or disciplinary process, while on maternity leave.
The outcome
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all complaints.
- The dismissal was automatically unfair because no disciplinary process was followed, and the reason was pregnancy/maternity discrimination.
- The employer also failed to pay correct statutory maternity pay and holiday pay, and did not provide written particulars of employment.
- Compensation totalled £37,310.05, including:
- Basic award: £3,018.63
- Compensatory award: £11,962
- Injury to feelings: £10,000
- Interest on injury to feelings: £1,061
- ACAS uplift (25%): £7,094.01
- Arrears of wages (SMP and holiday pay): £2,810.41
- Failure to provide written particulars: £779
Lessons & takeaways
- Dismissing an employee by email without any investigation or hearing is almost certainly unfair – tribunals expect a proper process even for gross misconduct allegations.
- Pregnancy and maternity leave are protected characteristics – any dismissal connected to them is automatically discriminatory and unfair.
- Employers must provide written particulars of employment – failing to do so can result in additional compensation of up to 4 weeks' pay.
- If an employer ignores a request to appeal, that can worsen the outcome and increase compensation.
- Long-serving employees with unblemished records are entitled to a full and fair process before dismissal.
A 19-year career ended by a single email
This case shows how a complete failure of process can turn a routine employment relationship into a tribunal claim. The claimant had worked for 52 Street Events Supplies Ltd for 19 years without any disciplinary issues. While on maternity leave, she raised concerns about being underpaid and not receiving correct holiday pay. Instead of addressing those concerns, the managing director sent a dismissal email at 8am, alleging gross misconduct – without any investigation, disciplinary hearing, or opportunity for her to respond.
The tribunal found that the dismissal was not only procedurally unfair but also discriminatory. The claimant had been on maternity leave and had raised legitimate complaints about her pay. The employer's response was to terminate her employment summarily, ignoring her request for an appeal. The tribunal described the claimant as a credible witness who clearly valued her job for both financial independence and personal fulfilment.
What the employer could have done differently
The employer had several opportunities to avoid this outcome. A proper investigation into the alleged misconduct, a disciplinary hearing where the claimant could present her side, and a genuine appeal process would have been the minimum expected. Even if the employer believed there was a genuine issue, dismissing by email without any process was outside the range of reasonable responses. The tribunal also noted that the employer failed to provide written particulars of employment and underpaid statutory maternity pay and holiday pay – basic obligations that any employer should meet.
Why this matters for similar claims
This case is a reminder that employees on maternity leave have enhanced protection. Dismissing someone in these circumstances, especially without any process, is likely to be both unfair dismissal and discrimination. The compensation here included a 25% uplift because the employer failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary procedures. For employees, it shows the importance of keeping records and raising concerns in writing. For employers, it underscores that cutting corners on process – particularly when an employee is on maternity leave – can be very costly.
Similar cases
Pregnant office administrator dismissed after employer ignored risk assessment request
A tribunal awarded over £10,000 to two office administrators after finding that one was discriminated against due to pregnancy and the other unfairly dismissed. The employer failed to conduct a pregnancy risk assessment and did not provide written employment particulars.
Dismissed without notice and discriminated against: a double blow for a former employee
A former employee was unfairly dismissed, wrongfully dismissed without notice, and discriminated against on grounds of sex. The tribunal awarded £16,208.68, including an uplift for the employer's failure to follow the ACAS code.
Dismissed after raising health and safety concerns: a partial win for the employee
A former employee of Ian Henery Solicitors Ltd was initially found to be unfairly dismissed for raising health and safety concerns, but the unfair dismissal judgment was later revoked. The tribunal confirmed wrongful dismissal and awarded £3,336 in total.
Unfair dismissal and unpaid wages: former employee awarded £12,503
A former employee has been awarded £12,503 after an employment tribunal found she was unfairly dismissed, not given notice, and had wages unlawfully deducted by RR Swami Ltd.
