Race discrimination claim allowed to proceed over grievance process
A former IBM employee won permission to amend his race discrimination claim to include the grievance process, but earlier allegations were struck out as out of time.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimant resigned from IBM on 5 July 2021 and his employment ended on 5 August 2021.
- He submitted a written grievance on 22 July 2021, while still an employee.
- The grievance outcome was given on 7 December 2021, and the appeal outcome on 1 April 2022.
- The ET1 was presented on 11 April 2022, ticking boxes for unfair dismissal and race discrimination.
- The claimant withdrew his unfair dismissal claim at the hearing, leaving only race discrimination.
- The tribunal allowed an amendment to include claims of direct race discrimination and/or victimisation in the grievance process.
Timeline
-
Employment started
The claimant joined IBM in 2018.
-
Resignation notice
The claimant gave notice of his resignation.
-
Grievance submitted
The claimant submitted a written grievance while still employed.
-
Last day at work
The claimant's last day at work.
-
Employment ended
The claimant's employment with IBM ended.
-
Grievance outcome
The claimant received the outcome of his grievance.
-
Grievance appeal outcome
The claimant received the outcome of his grievance appeal.
-
Early conciliation started
The claimant entered early conciliation (Day A).
-
ET1 presented
The claimant presented his ET1 claim form.
-
Amendment application
The claimant applied to amend his claim to include the grievance process.
-
First preliminary hearing
A preliminary hearing was held and adjourned part heard.
-
Second preliminary hearing
The substantive preliminary hearing took place.
-
Judgment sent
The reserved judgment was issued.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether to allow the former employee to amend his claim to include allegations of race discrimination and victimisation in the conduct and outcome of his grievance, and whether those claims were brought within the statutory time limits.
The outcome
The tribunal granted permission to amend the claim to include direct race discrimination and/or victimisation in the grievance process (including the appeal), but struck out all complaints relating to events before 22 July 2021 as out of time, with no extension granted.
- The amendment was allowed because the grievance process was a continuing act that extended beyond the claimant's employment.
- Claims about earlier events were struck out because they were presented more than three months after the act complained of, and it was not just and equitable to extend time.
- No compensation was awarded at this stage as the case proceeds to a full hearing.
Lessons & takeaways
- Time limits for discrimination claims are strict — you generally have three months from the last act of discrimination to bring a claim.
- A grievance process can be treated as a continuing act of discrimination if the alleged discrimination occurs during the process itself.
- If you want to include new allegations after filing your claim, apply to amend as soon as possible to avoid strike-out risks.
- Withdrawing an unfair dismissal claim does not automatically affect a discrimination claim — they are separate causes of action.
This case shows how employment tribunals handle claims that evolve after the initial claim form is submitted. The former employee, who worked in IT at IBM for three years, resigned in July 2021 and submitted a grievance while still employed. After receiving the grievance outcome and appeal decision months later, he brought a race discrimination claim. At a preliminary hearing, the tribunal had to decide whether he could amend his claim to include the grievance process itself as part of the alleged discrimination.
What the tribunal decided
The tribunal allowed the amendment, recognising that the grievance process could be a continuing act of discrimination. However, it struck out all claims about events before 22 July 2021 because they were presented too late — the early conciliation certificate was issued on 11 April 2022, more than three months after those events. The tribunal found no reason to extend time on a 'just and equitable' basis.
What IBM could have done differently
IBM opposed the amendment, arguing the new claims were out of time and had no reasonable prospects. The tribunal rejected that view, noting the grievance process was ongoing until the appeal outcome on 1 April 2022 — well within the time limit. Employers should be aware that handling grievances in a way that arguably discriminates can extend the limitation period.
Why this matters
This decision highlights the importance of timing in discrimination claims. Employees should act quickly to preserve their rights, but also understand that a poorly handled grievance process can create fresh claims. For employers, it reinforces that grievance outcomes and appeals can be challenged as discriminatory acts, not just the original decision that led to the grievance.
Similar cases
HR Business Partner dismissed after one month for whistleblowing: £74,540 awarded
An HR Business Partner who raised concerns about a flawed redundancy process was dismissed after just one month. The tribunal awarded £74,540 after striking out the employer's response.
Redundancy dismissal and victimisation claims fail: law enforcement officer loses tribunal case
A law enforcement officer with four years' service was fairly dismissed by redundancy and his claims of race and age discrimination, harassment, and victimisation were dismissed by the tribunal.
Whistleblowing and victimisation claims survive strike-out but deposit ordered
A tribunal refused to strike out a universal education facilitator's whistleblowing and victimisation claims against Turning Point, but ordered her to pay a £150 deposit for each to proceed.
Former IT professional's discrimination claim struck out after tampering with evidence
A tribunal struck out a former JP Morgan employee's discrimination claim after he inserted a poem into disclosed documents and sent the tampered version to the tribunal. Most allegations were also dismissed as out of time.
