Senior managers dismissed without investigation: unfair and wrongful dismissal
Five senior managers were summarily dismissed for gross misconduct without any investigation or appeal. The tribunal found the dismissals unfair and wrongful, and awarded unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.
1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimants were senior managers summarily dismissed on 23 February 2023 for alleged gross misconduct.
- The respondent conducted no investigation and held no disciplinary hearing before dismissing the claimants.
- The claimants were not paid wages for 1-23 February 2023 or accrued holiday pay.
- The respondent went into administration on 5 May 2023.
- The tribunal found the dismissals unfair and wrongful, and awarded unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.
Timeline
-
Mr Sharp started employment
Mr David Sharp commenced employment as Commercial Director.
-
Mr Evans started employment
Mr William Evans commenced employment as Finance Director.
-
Mr Edwards started employment
Mr Mark Edwards commenced employment as Chief Executive Officer.
-
Mr Elrick started employment
Mr Terence Elrick commenced employment, later became Acting Managing Director.
-
Mr Hurley started employment
Mr David Hurley commenced employment as Operations and Installation Director.
-
Summary dismissal
The claimants were summarily dismissed for alleged gross misconduct without investigation or appeal.
-
Administration
Futurama Limited entered administration.
-
Hearing
The employment tribunal heard the claims.
-
Judgment
The tribunal issued judgment finding unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal, and awarding remedies.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the summary dismissals for alleged gross misconduct were fair and lawful, and whether the claimants were entitled to unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld all claims. It found that the dismissals were unfair because the employer conducted no investigation, held no disciplinary hearing, and denied any right of appeal. The dismissals were also wrongful because the employer failed to give contractual notice.
The tribunal also ordered payment of unpaid wages for February 2023 and accrued holiday pay. Compensation included:
- Unpaid wages (1-23 Feb 2023)
- Accrued holiday pay on termination
- Statutory notice pay
- Contractual notice pay (balance of notice period less statutory notice)
- Basic awards for unfair dismissal (for the four claimants with over two years' service)
No compensatory awards were made for the other four claimants (with their agreement) due to the company being in administration.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must carry out a reasonable investigation and hold a disciplinary hearing before dismissing for gross misconduct, even for senior staff.
- Summary dismissal without notice is only lawful if the employee has committed gross misconduct; the employer must still follow a fair process.
- Denying a right of appeal makes a dismissal almost certainly unfair.
- Employees are entitled to be paid for all work done up to the date of dismissal, and for accrued but untaken holiday.
- If a company goes into administration, employees may still pursue claims and obtain judgments, but recovering money may be difficult.
This case shows what happens when an employer dispenses with basic employment protections. The senior management team of Futurama Limited were summoned to an extraordinary board meeting and summarily dismissed for alleged gross misconduct. No investigation was carried out, no disciplinary hearing was held, and no right of appeal was offered. The tribunal found this process fell so far below the minimum standards that the dismissals were automatically unfair.
What the employer did wrong
The employer's director, Mr McMurray, did not attend the tribunal hearing and sent only a blank document. The tribunal noted that the dismissals were decided by the parent company's board without any input from the employees. The allegations of mismanagement were serious, but the employer made no attempt to gather evidence, interview the managers, or allow them to respond. The tribunal described the dismissals as 'summary' in the truest sense: instant and without process.
Why this matters
This case is a stark reminder that even senior managers are entitled to a fair procedure. The law does not allow employers to skip investigation and hearing just because they suspect gross misconduct. The tribunal also awarded unpaid wages and holiday pay, showing that employers cannot withhold pay owed for work already done. Although the company went into administration, the judgment provides a clear record of the unfairness, which may help the claimants in other proceedings.
What could have been done differently
The employer could have suspended the managers pending a proper investigation, appointed an impartial investigator, held a disciplinary hearing with the right to be accompanied, and offered a right of appeal. Instead, they acted on allegations without any scrutiny. The result was a finding of unfair and wrongful dismissal, with awards for notice pay and unpaid sums.
Similar cases
Courier with 9 years' service summarily dismissed without notice: unfair dismissal and unpaid wages claim succeeds
A courier who was summarily dismissed without notice after 9 years' service has won his unfair dismissal claim, securing over £15,000 in compensation for unpaid wages, notice pay, and holiday pay.
Constructive dismissal after unilateral cut to hours and pay: a breach of trust that went too far
A senior carer with 14 years' service was constructively dismissed after her employer unilaterally reduced her hours and pay, then suspended her over alleged holiday pay fraud. The tribunal awarded £41,039 in compensation.
Cleaner with 7 years' service dismissed without any redundancy process: bowling club found liable
A cleaner was unfairly dismissed when a bowling club committee decided to let her go without notice or any redundancy procedure. The tribunal awarded £7,252 in compensation, including an ACAS uplift for failing to follow the statutory code.
Cleaner dismissed during Covid-19: employer's failure to respond leads to £2,719 payout
A part-time cleaner who was dismissed after asking to be furloughed has won her unfair dismissal claim after her employer failed to submit a response to the tribunal.
