Claimant won £26,374 awarded Employment Tribunal · 17 October 2023

Constructive dismissal after grievance appeal handler was a friend of the employer

A former employee with six years' service won £26,374 after resigning when he discovered the grievance appeal handler was a friend of his employer. The tribunal found the employer breached the ACAS Code and made unauthorised deductions.

1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant resigned on 6 June 2022 after discovering the grievance appeal handler was a friend of the respondent.
  • The respondent failed to provide the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment.
  • The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for 4 days in June 2022.
  • The claimant was constructively dismissed due to the respondent's breach of the ACAS Code of Practice.
  • The respondent did not attend the hearing and the claimant's evidence was unchallenged.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    Claimant began working for the respondent.

  2. Grievance submitted

    Claimant submitted a grievance following his suspension.

  3. Grievance hearing

    Grievance hearing took place with a HR company appointed by the respondent.

  4. Grievance outcome

    Claimant was informed his grievance was unsubstantiated and offered a right to appeal.

  5. Resignation

    Claimant resigned after discovering the appeal handler was a friend of the respondent.

  6. New company incorporated

    Claimant incorporated his own company.

  7. First wages from new company

    Claimant received his first wages from his new company.

  8. ET1 issued

    Claimant presented his claim to the tribunal.

  9. Response struck out

    The respondent's response was struck out.

  10. Hearing

    Substantive hearing to consider the claimant's Schedule of Loss.

The outcome

The tribunal upheld the claim of constructive unfair dismissal. The employer failed to attend the hearing, and the employee's evidence was unchallenged.

Compensation awarded:

  • Basic award: £3,426
  • Compensatory award: £18,416.82
  • Unauthorised deduction: £405.73
  • Failure to provide written particulars: £2,284
  • ACAS Code uplift: £1,841.68
  • Total: £26,374.23

Lessons & takeaways

  • If you resign because of your employer's conduct, you must do so promptly after discovering the breach – delay can weaken your case.
  • Employers must ensure grievance appeal handlers are impartial; using a friend of the employer can be a fundamental breach of trust.
  • Keep records of all communications and documents – they are crucial evidence if you bring a claim.
  • Employers who fail to attend tribunal hearings risk having claims decided against them based on the employee's unchallenged evidence.
  • The ACAS Code of Practice on grievance procedures applies to all employers; breaching it can lead to an uplift in compensation of up to 25%.

When trust breaks down: a case about impartiality

This case shows how important it is for employers to handle grievances fairly and impartially. The employee had worked for Causeway Heating Services Limited for six years when he was suspended and submitted a grievance. The company appointed an external HR firm to hear the grievance, which was rejected. But when the employee tried to appeal, he discovered that the appeal handler was a friend of the employer. He resigned immediately.

What went wrong

The employer made several mistakes. First, it failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars, which is a legal requirement. Second, it made an unauthorised deduction from wages for four days in June 2022. But the most significant issue was the lack of impartiality in the grievance appeal process. By appointing a friend to handle the appeal, the employer destroyed the trust and confidence necessary for the employment relationship. The tribunal found that this was a fundamental breach of contract, entitling the employee to resign and claim constructive dismissal.

Why the result matters

For employees, this case is a reminder that you do not have to accept a biased grievance process. If your employer's conduct is so serious that it undermines the relationship, you may be able to resign and claim constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal also applied an uplift of 10% for breaching the ACAS Code of Practice, which sets out minimum standards for handling grievances. Employers should note that failing to follow the Code can increase compensation awards.

The employer did not attend the hearing, so the employee's evidence was unchallenged. This highlights the importance of engaging with tribunal proceedings – ignoring them does not make the claim go away.

Similar cases