Unfair dismissal after employer enters administration: compensation awarded
A former employee with 5 years' service was awarded £8,756 after her employer failed to defend her unfair dismissal claim and later entered administration.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Key facts
- The claimant was employed from 15 January 2015 until 3 November 2020.
- Her gross weekly pay was £191.84 based on a 22-hour week at NMW.
- The first respondent went into administration on 21 July 2021.
- The claimant did not obtain alternative employment or claim benefits after dismissal.
- The respondent failed to defend the claim and the response was struck out.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Miss H Grogan began working for Greenbrow Social Club Ltd.
-
Dismissal
The claimant was dismissed from her employment.
-
Tribunal orders sent
The Tribunal sent orders to the parties.
-
Strike out warning
The Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to show cause why the response should not be struck out.
-
First respondent entered administration
Greenbrow Social Club Ltd went into administration.
-
Response struck out
Employment Judge Holmes struck out the respondent's response due to non-compliance and failure to defend.
-
Claimant provided payslips
The claimant submitted payslips showing furlough pay of £144.50 per week.
-
Judgment issued
Employment Judge Holmes made awards for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and holiday pay.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to determine the amount of compensation for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and holiday pay where the employer did not defend the claim and entered administration.
The outcome
The tribunal found in favour of the former employee, awarding a total of £8,756.45. The employer's response was struck out for failing to comply with tribunal orders and not actively defending the claim.
Compensation breakdown:
- Basic award for unfair dismissal: £1,438.80
- Compensatory award for unfair dismissal: £5,656.32
- Notice pay: £959.20
- Holiday pay: £702.13
Lessons & takeaways
- If an employer fails to defend a claim, the tribunal can strike out their response and proceed to judgment based on the claimant's evidence.
- When calculating loss of earnings after dismissal, the tribunal may consider when employment would have ended in any event, such as when the employer entered administration.
- Claimants should provide clear evidence of their earnings, including any furlough payments, to ensure the correct weekly pay is used in calculations.
This case shows what can happen when an employer simply does not engage with tribunal proceedings. The former employee, who had worked for Greenbrow Social Club Ltd for five years, brought claims for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and holiday pay after being dismissed in November 2020. The employer failed to comply with tribunal orders and indicated it did not intend to defend the claim, leading to its response being struck out.
What the tribunal decided
With no defence from the employer, the tribunal assessed compensation based on the claimant's evidence. It accepted her gross weekly pay of £191.84 (based on a 22-hour week at the National Minimum Wage), rather than the lower furlough figure she had received. The tribunal calculated the basic award at 1.5 weeks' pay per year of service, giving £1,438.80.
For the compensatory award, the tribunal considered that the claimant's employment would have ended when the employer entered administration on 21 July 2021. It awarded loss of earnings for 32 weeks after the notice period, totalling £5,656.32. Notice pay of £959.20 and holiday pay of £702.13 were also awarded.
What the employer could have done differently
If the employer had engaged with the process, it could have potentially argued that the dismissal was fair or that the claimant's losses were limited. By failing to defend, it left the tribunal to decide based solely on the claimant's submissions.
Why this matters
This case highlights that tribunals will proceed without an employer's input if they fail to comply. It also shows how the administration of an employer can cap the period of lost earnings, as the tribunal assumed employment would have ended on that date in any event.
Similar cases
Dismissed before club entered administration: unfair dismissal compensation awarded
A former employee of Greenbrow Social Club Ltd. was found unfairly dismissed and awarded £5,972.33, including basic and compensatory awards, notice pay, and holiday pay.
Redundancy without consultation: nursery worker wins unfair dismissal claim
A former employee of Greenfields Nursery Ltd was unfairly dismissed after the nursery failed to carry out any redundancy consultation. The tribunal awarded £4,439.30.
Unfair dismissal but 100% Polkey reduction due to workplace closure
A former employee was unfairly dismissed but received only limited compensation because the tribunal found he would have been fairly dismissed a month later when the workplace closed. Total award: £12,419.29.
Kitchen manager dismissed without consultation in redundancy: unfair dismissal
A kitchen manager with two years' service was unfairly dismissed when her employer made her redundant without any consultation or warning. The tribunal awarded £4,809.49 in compensation.
