Claimant won £17,355 awarded Employment Tribunal · 19 July 2022

Unauthorised deductions and unfair dismissal: employer's silence leads to £17k award

A former employee of Shuropody Retail Ltd has been awarded £17,355.27 after the tribunal found the company made unauthorised wage deductions, failed to pay holiday pay, and unfairly dismissed her.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed by the respondent for 4 years.
  • The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages totalling £1,970.96.
  • The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of £838.93.
  • The claimant was unfairly dismissed.
  • The respondent failed to present a valid response to the claim.
  • A remedy hearing was held on 9 November 2022 to determine compensation.

Timeline

  1. Dismissal date

    The claimant was dismissed from employment, starting the prescribed period for loss of earnings.

  2. Claim issued

    The claimant issued proceedings in the Leeds Employment Tribunal.

  3. Initial judgment

    Employment Judge Lancaster issued a Rule 21 judgment finding unauthorised deductions, unpaid holiday pay, and unfair dismissal, awarding basic award of £2,025.00.

  4. Remedy hearing

    A remedy hearing was held to determine compensatory award for unfair dismissal.

The outcome

The tribunal found in favour of the former employee on all claims. The respondent failed to submit a valid response, leading to a Rule 21 judgment.

Compensation awarded:

  • Basic award for unfair dismissal: £2,025.00
  • Unauthorised deductions from wages: £1,970.96
  • Unpaid holiday pay: £838.93
  • Compensatory award for unfair dismissal: £12,520.38 (including loss of earnings, pension, and statutory rights)
  • Total: £17,355.27

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employers must respond to tribunal claims on time; failing to do so can result in a default judgment against them.
  • Unauthorised deductions from wages and unpaid holiday pay are common claims that can be pursued together with unfair dismissal.
  • Even without a compensatory award at the initial stage, claimants can seek further compensation at a remedy hearing.
  • Calculating a basic award requires knowing the employee's age, length of service, and weekly pay.

This case shows what can happen when an employer fails to engage with employment tribunal proceedings. The former employee, who had worked for Shuropody Retail Ltd for four years, brought claims for unauthorised deductions from wages, unpaid holiday pay, and unfair dismissal. The company did not present a valid response, so the tribunal issued a default judgment under Rule 21.

What the tribunal found

The tribunal found that Shuropody had made unauthorised deductions totalling £1,970.96 and failed to pay £838.93 in holiday pay. The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded. At a subsequent remedy hearing, the claimant was awarded £12,520.38 in compensation for loss of earnings, pension, and statutory rights, on top of the £2,025.00 basic award.

What the employer could have done differently

Shuropody could have avoided this outcome by submitting a valid response to the claim. By failing to do so, they lost the opportunity to contest the allegations or argue for a lower award. Engaging with the process and providing evidence might have reduced the compensation or even defeated the claims.

Why this matters

This case is a reminder that employment tribunals can proceed without the employer's input if they fail to respond. For employees, it shows that even without legal representation, claims can succeed when the employer does not defend them. The total award of £17,355.27 reflects the range of losses that can be claimed, including wages, holiday pay, and future losses.

Similar cases