90-day protective award for employees after company failed to consult on redundancies
An employment tribunal has awarded 90 days' pay to former employees of Richmann Walsh Engineering Limited after the company entered administration without carrying out collective redundancy consultation.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #protective-award
- #redundancy
- #failure-to-consult
- #administration
- #consolidated-claims
Key facts
- The claimants were employees of Richmann Walsh Engineering Limited.
- The company entered administration.
- The respondent failed to comply with section 188 of TULRCA 1992 regarding collective redundancy consultation.
- A protective award of 90 days' remuneration was made for all claimants.
- The hearing was conducted on the papers with consent.
Timeline
-
Protected period start
The protected period for the protective award begins on this date.
-
Consolidation order
Regional Employment Judge Findlay consolidated the two sets of claims.
-
Final hearing and judgment
Employment Judge Perry made a protective award of 90 days' remuneration for all claimants.
The legal issue
Whether the employer failed to comply with its legal duty to consult collectively with employees or their representatives before making redundancies, as required by section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The outcome
The tribunal ruled in favour of the former employees, finding that Richmann Walsh Engineering Limited had failed to comply with its collective redundancy consultation obligations.
A protective award of 90 days' remuneration was made for all claimants listed in the schedules, covering the period starting 20 July 2022. The award is subject to recoupment of certain benefits.
No specific compensation breakdown was provided; the award covers remuneration for the protected period.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers entering administration are still required to consult collectively before making 20 or more redundancies within 90 days.
- Failure to consult can result in a protective award of up to 90 days' pay per employee, even if the company is insolvent.
- Employees affected by a lack of consultation can bring claims to an employment tribunal, which may be determined on paper if the employer does not contest.
- Consolidation of multiple claims can streamline proceedings, as happened here when two sets of claims were merged.
This case demonstrates that even when a company enters administration, it cannot sidestep its legal duty to consult employees before making them redundant. Richmann Walsh Engineering Limited failed to comply with section 188 of TULRCA 1992, which requires employers to consult collectively when proposing to dismiss 20 or more employees at one establishment within a 90-day period.
The tribunal made a protective award of 90 days' remuneration for all affected employees, starting from 20 July 2022. This means the former workers are entitled to pay for that period, though any jobseeker's allowance or other benefits received during that time may be recouped by the Secretary of State.
What the employer could have done differently
Even in financial distress, the company could have initiated consultation with employee representatives or a trade union as soon as redundancies were proposed. The administrators should have been aware of the statutory obligations. By failing to do so, they exposed the company to a protective award that added to the liabilities.
Why this matters
This ruling reinforces that collective redundancy consultation is a fundamental right, not an optional extra. Employees whose employers ignore this duty can bring claims to an employment tribunal, and the tribunal can make awards even when the employer is in administration. The case also shows that tribunals can decide matters on paper if all parties consent, making the process more accessible for claimants.
Similar cases
221 workers win maximum protective award after redundancy without any consultation
A tribunal has awarded 221 former employees of SP Group Ltd a protective award of 90 days' pay after the company made them redundant without any collective consultation when it went into administration.
Redundancy consultation failure leads to protective award for former employee
A former employee of Nationwide Accident Repair Services has been awarded a protective award of 90 days' pay after the company failed to consult properly on mass redundancies. His unfair dismissal claim was later struck out because the company was in administration.
Redundancy without consultation: protective award of 90 days' pay
A former employee won a protective award of 90 days' pay after his employer made him redundant without any consultation. The company was in administration and did not attend the hearing.
TUPE transfer during liquidation: protective award and unfair dismissal claims fail, but consultation breach succeeds
Former telemarketing employees lose protective award and unfair dismissal claims after a TUPE transfer from a company in creditors' voluntary liquidation, but win compensation for failure to consult.
