Unauthorised wage deductions and holiday pay: a case on written consent
A former employee won £292.92 after his employer made deductions from wages without written authorisation and failed to pay holiday pay. The employer later tried to rely on evidence it could have produced at the original hearing.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #unauthorised-deduction
- #holiday-pay
- #working-time-regulations
- #no-written-contract
- #concession-at-hearing
Key facts
- The claimant worked for the respondent and had no written contract.
- The respondent made deductions from the claimant's wages without written authorisation.
- The parties agreed the claimant was owed £280.92 for unpaid holiday.
- The respondent conceded at hearing that an additional hour's pay of £12 was due.
- The total award was £292.92 for unauthorised deductions and holiday pay.
Timeline
-
Substantive hearing
The tribunal heard evidence from both parties. The respondent conceded the claimant was owed £280.92 holiday pay and an additional hour's pay of £12.
-
Judgment issued
Employment Judge Wyeth ordered the respondent to pay £292.92 for unauthorised deductions and holiday pay.
-
Judgment sent to parties
The written judgment and reasons were sent to the parties.
-
Respondent applied for reconsideration
The respondent applied for reconsideration, seeking to rely on handwritten rotas to dispute the 51 hours.
-
Reconsideration refused
Employment Judge Wyeth refused the application, finding no reasonable prospect of the judgment being varied or revoked.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer had made unauthorised deductions from the employee's wages, including unpaid holiday pay, in breach of Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The outcome
The tribunal ruled in favour of the former employee, ordering the employer to pay £292.92 for unauthorised deductions and holiday pay.
Key reasons:
- The employer had no written contract authorising deductions from wages.
- The employer conceded at the hearing that it owed £280.92 for unpaid holiday and an additional hour's pay of £12.
- The employer's later attempt to introduce new evidence (handwritten rotas) was refused as that evidence was available at the original hearing.
Compensation:
- Total award: £292.92 (gross)
- Holiday pay: £280.92
- Additional hour's pay: £12.00
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must have written authorisation from employees before making deductions from wages, otherwise the deductions are likely to be unlawful.
- If you have no written contract, it is harder for an employer to justify deductions – keep records of any agreements in writing.
- Concessions made at a tribunal hearing are binding – you cannot later introduce evidence that was available at the time to overturn a decision.
- Employees can bring claims for unpaid holiday pay and other wage deductions without needing a solicitor – the process is designed to be accessible.
This case shows what can happen when an employer makes deductions from wages without a written agreement. The former employee had no written contract, and the employer had nothing in writing authorising deductions. At the hearing, the employer accepted it owed £280.92 for unpaid holiday and an extra hour's pay of £12, leading to a total award of £292.92.
What the employer could have done differently
The employer could have avoided this claim entirely by having a written contract that clearly set out any circumstances where deductions could be made. Even without a contract, the employer should have obtained the employee's written consent before making deductions. At the hearing, the employer conceded the amounts owed – but later tried to introduce handwritten rotas to dispute the hours. The tribunal refused this, noting the evidence was available at the time and the employer had chosen to concede.
Why this matters
This case is a reminder that the law on unauthorised deductions is strict. Employees do not need a solicitor to bring such claims, and tribunals will enforce the requirement for written authorisation. For employees, it shows that even small amounts – here, just under £300 – can be successfully recovered. For employers, it highlights the importance of proper documentation and the risks of making deductions without clear consent.
Similar cases
Former employee wins £10k for unpaid wages, holiday pay and redundancy
A former employee has been awarded £10,125.26 after his employer made an unauthorised deduction from his wages, failed to pay accrued holiday pay, and withheld statutory redundancy pay.
Unfair dismissal but 100% Polkey reduction due to workplace closure
A former employee was unfairly dismissed but received only limited compensation because the tribunal found he would have been fairly dismissed a month later when the workplace closed. Total award: £12,419.29.
Former employee's race discrimination claim dismissed but holiday pay awarded
A former employee's claim for unfair dismissal and race discrimination failed due to time limits, but the tribunal awarded £243.54 for unpaid holiday pay.
Short-service employee wins unpaid wages and holiday pay claim
A former employee who worked for less than two years had their redundancy and unfair dismissal claims struck out, but won £2,691 for unauthorised wage deductions and unpaid holiday pay.
