Constructive dismissal after demotion and ignored distress: a breach of trust and confidence
A MASH/Link Officer with seven years' service was constructively dismissed after being removed from management duties and having her distress ignored. The tribunal awarded £39,168, reduced by 25% for her own conduct.
2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #constructive-dismissal
- #demotion
- #breach-of-trust-and-confidence
- #inadequate-response-to-distress
- #contributory-fault
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a MASH/Link Officer from 30 June 2014 until her resignation on 24 May 2021.
- On 13 May 2021, the claimant was removed from the housing management team and her line management was changed, resulting in a loss of status and opportunities.
- The respondent failed to respond adequately to the claimant's email of 20 May 2021 expressing distress about the changes.
- The tribunal found that the removal from the management team was a breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence.
- The claimant's conduct contributed to her dismissal, leading to a 25% reduction in the basic and compensatory awards.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began working as a MASH/Link Officer for the respondent.
-
Ms Hudson appointed
Ms Hudson became Assistant Director of Housing and the claimant's line manager.
-
Weekly reports requested
Ms Hudson asked the claimant to provide weekly reports on her work.
-
Meeting and telephone call
Ms Hudson attended a meeting with the claimant and later called her, leading to a tense exchange.
-
Line management changed
Claimant was informed her line management would move from Ms Hudson to Ms Sharp, and she was removed from management meetings and opportunities.
-
Claimant emailed distress
Claimant emailed Ms Sharp and Ms Hudson stating she felt unsafe and upset by the changes.
-
Resignation
Claimant resigned with immediate effect, citing demotion and bullying.
-
Grievance submitted
Claimant sent a grievance letter detailing alleged bullying and breaches.
-
Liability judgment
Tribunal found constructive unfair dismissal and listed a remedy hearing.
-
Remedy judgment
Claimant awarded £39,168 after reductions for contributory fault and statutory cap.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer's actions — removing the claimant from her management role, changing her line management, and failing to address her distress — amounted to a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, and whether the claimant was therefore constructively dismissed.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal. It found that the respondent's removal of the claimant from the management team and its failure to respond appropriately to her email of 20 May 2021, in which she described her distress, amounted to a breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence. The claimant was entitled to treat herself as dismissed.
Compensation was reduced by 25% for contributory fault, reflecting the claimant's own conduct in the events leading to the dismissal. The award was also subject to the statutory cap.
- Basic award: £3,672
- Compensatory award: £35,496
- Total award: £39,168 (after 25% contributory reduction and statutory cap applied)
Lessons & takeaways
- If you are demoted or have your status reduced without consultation, this can amount to a fundamental breach of trust and confidence — a key element in constructive dismissal claims.
- Employers must take seriously any communication from an employee expressing distress about workplace changes; ignoring or downplaying such concerns can be a final straw that justifies resignation.
- Your own conduct during the events leading to resignation can reduce compensation — tribunals can apply a contributory fault reduction of up to 100%.
- Constructive dismissal claims require you to resign in response to a fundamental breach — you cannot affirm the contract by staying too long after the breach.
This case shows how a seemingly routine management decision — removing an employee from a management team and changing their line management — can, if handled insensitively, lead to a successful constructive dismissal claim. The claimant, a MASH/Link Officer with seven years' service, was told on 13 May 2021 that she would no longer report to her existing manager and would be removed from management meetings and projects. She emailed her new and old managers on 20 May describing her distress, but received no meaningful response. Four days later she resigned, citing demotion and bullying.
The tribunal found that the removal from the management team was a breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence. Crucially, the employer's failure to respond adequately to her distress email was the final straw that made the breach repudiatory. The employer argued that suggesting a meeting with her new line manager was sufficient, but the tribunal disagreed — the response did not address the claimant's genuine distress or the underlying issues.
What the employer could have done differently
The respondent could have avoided liability by handling the restructure more carefully. Consulting the claimant before removing her from the management team, explaining the reasons, and offering a right of appeal would have helped. Most importantly, when the claimant expressed distress, a prompt and empathetic response — perhaps a meeting to discuss her concerns — would have shown that the employer took her seriously and could have repaired the trust.
Why this matters for similar claims
This case is a reminder that constructive dismissal claims often turn on the 'final straw' — the last act that makes the employee decide they cannot continue. Even if earlier conduct is not itself a breach, a final act that shows a lack of care can be enough. Employees considering resignation should document any changes to their role or status, and any communications expressing distress. Employers should ensure that any restructure is communicated sensitively and that employee concerns are addressed promptly.
Similar cases
Demoted without consultation: constructive dismissal after 20 years' service
A long-serving installations manager was constructively dismissed after being demoted twice without consultation. The tribunal awarded £24,331.
Registered manager wins constructive dismissal after promised new role never materialised
A registered manager with seven years' service was constructively dismissed after her employer failed to implement a promised Yorkshire Manager role, instead creating a new role that effectively demoted her. The tribunal awarded £14,594.38.
Sales executive constructively dismissed after unfounded allegations and withheld commission
A sales executive with a clean record was given a final written warning for baseless dishonesty allegations and had commission withheld. The tribunal found he was constructively unfairly dismissed.
Constructive dismissal claim fails despite breach of trust: 5-month delay in resigning was fatal
An insurance broker who resigned 5 months after a flawed disciplinary hearing lost her constructive unfair dismissal claim because the tribunal found she did not resign in response to the breach of trust and confidence.