Sales executive constructively dismissed after unfounded allegations and withheld commission
A sales executive with a clean record was given a final written warning for baseless dishonesty allegations and had commission withheld. The tribunal found he was constructively unfairly dismissed.
1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
- #constructive-dismissal
- #breach-of-trust-and-confidence
- #unfair-disciplinary-process
- #unfounded-allegations
- #withheld-commission
- #threats-of-dismissal
Key facts
- The claimant resigned on 31 October 2022 after being given a final written warning for unfounded allegations of dishonesty.
- The managing director, Mr Johnson, repeatedly threatened to sack the claimant and conducted disciplinary hearings in breach of the company's own policy.
- The claimant had a clean disciplinary record before Mr Johnson joined the company in March 2022.
- The respondent withheld commission payments from the claimant without reasonable grounds.
- The tribunal found that Mr Johnson's conduct was intended to intimidate the claimant and assert managerial authority.
Timeline
-
Claimant started employment
Mr D White commenced employment as a Sales Executive/Administrator.
-
Mr Johnson joined as Managing Director
Mr Peter Johnson started as managing director, and the claimant's relationship with him became difficult.
-
New disciplinary policy introduced
Mr Johnson introduced a new Disciplinary Policy and Procedure.
-
First written warning issued
Mr Johnson gave the claimant a written warning for failing to complete a driver's logbook, without following proper procedure.
-
Final written warning issued
The claimant was ambushed in a disciplinary meeting and given a final written warning for unfounded allegations of dishonesty.
-
Claimant resigned
The claimant handed in a letter of resignation, citing the treatment he had received.
-
Claim presented to tribunal
The claimant presented claims of constructive unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and unpaid notice pay.
-
Hearing day 1
The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and Mr Johnson.
-
Hearing day 2
The tribunal continued hearing evidence and submissions.
-
Judgment issued
The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on all claims.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer's behaviour, including a flawed disciplinary process and withholding commission, breached the implied term of trust and confidence, entitling the employee to resign and claim constructive unfair dismissal.
The outcome
The tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant on all claims: constructive unfair dismissal, unpaid notice pay, and unlawful deduction from wages.
Key reasons:
- The managing director, Mr Johnson, conducted disciplinary hearings in breach of the company's own policy and issued a final written warning based on unfounded allegations of dishonesty.
- Mr Johnson repeatedly threatened to sack the claimant and withheld commission payments without reasonable grounds.
- The claimant had a clean disciplinary record before Mr Johnson joined and was not given a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations.
Compensation: The judgment did not specify damages; a separate remedy hearing will determine the amount.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must follow their own disciplinary procedures and give employees a fair opportunity to respond to allegations, especially when the employee has a clean record.
- Withholding commission or other contractual payments without reasonable grounds can be a breach of trust and confidence, supporting a constructive dismissal claim.
- Threats to dismiss an employee, even if not carried out, can contribute to a breakdown in trust and confidence.
- A change in management does not justify abandoning fair processes; new managers should adhere to established policies.
This case illustrates how a breakdown in trust and confidence can arise when a new manager imposes a heavy-handed approach without following proper procedures. The claimant, a sales executive with nearly three years' service and a clean disciplinary record, found himself subjected to a series of actions by the managing director that the tribunal described as intended to intimidate and assert authority.
What went wrong
The managing director, Mr Johnson, introduced a new disciplinary policy but then failed to follow it. He issued a written warning for a minor logbook issue without proper process, and later ambushed the claimant in a meeting to issue a final written warning for dishonesty – allegations the tribunal found to be unfounded. Mr Johnson also repeatedly threatened to sack the claimant and withheld commission payments without justification. The tribunal concluded that this conduct was calculated to destroy the relationship of trust and confidence.
What the employer could have done differently
Forest Master Limited could have avoided this outcome by following its own disciplinary procedure, giving the claimant a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations, and not making threats of dismissal. The commission payments should have been paid or at least properly explained. A fair and transparent process would have preserved trust and confidence.
Why this matters
This case is a reminder that constructive dismissal claims can succeed when an employer's conduct, taken as a whole, makes continued employment untenable. For employees, it shows the importance of documenting treatment and resigning promptly after a breach. For employers, it underscores that even small businesses must follow fair procedures and avoid conduct that undermines trust.
Similar cases
Demoted without consultation: constructive dismissal after 20 years' service
A long-serving installations manager was constructively dismissed after being demoted twice without consultation. The tribunal awarded £24,331.
Constructive dismissal claim fails despite breach of trust: 5-month delay in resigning was fatal
An insurance broker who resigned 5 months after a flawed disciplinary hearing lost her constructive unfair dismissal claim because the tribunal found she did not resign in response to the breach of trust and confidence.
Constructive dismissal after flawed grievance process: DHL manager wins unfair dismissal claim
A warehouse first line manager with three years' service at DHL Services Limited resigned after a flawed grievance process. The tribunal upheld his claim for constructive unfair dismissal.
Shop assistant with 20 years' service wins constructive dismissal claim over unpaid National Minimum Wage
A shop assistant who worked for 20 years without pay, then for below the National Minimum Wage, has won her constructive dismissal claim. The tribunal found she was subjected to detriments for asserting her right to be paid.
