Claim dismissed Employment Tribunal · 5 December 2023

Former HGV driver loses unfair dismissal claim after breaching unless order on abusive language

A former HGV driver's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claim was dismissed after he continued using abusive language, breaching an unless order. His application to set aside the order was refused.

1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant presented a claim in July 2018 for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
  • The claimant repeatedly used abusive and derogatory language towards the respondent and its representatives.
  • An unless order was made on 14 December 2022 requiring the claimant to cease such language.
  • The claimant breached the unless order by continuing to use derogatory language.
  • The claim was dismissed on 16 May 2023 due to the breach.
  • The claimant's application to set aside the unless order was refused on 1 December 2023.

Timeline

  1. Claim presented

    The claimant presented a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.

  2. Response filed

    The respondent filed a response resisting all claims.

  3. First case management hearing

    Regional Employment Judge Franey conducted the first case management hearing.

  4. Final hearing started

    The final hearing began but was adjourned due to unsuitable venue.

  5. Resumed hearing abandoned

    The resumed hearing was abandoned due to the first Covid lockdown.

  6. First warning about language

    The Tribunal sent a warning letter about the claimant's use of abusive language.

  7. Unless order made

    Employment Judge Butler made an unless order requiring the claimant to cease abusive language.

  8. Claim dismissed

    Employment Judge Allen found the claimant in breach of the unless order and dismissed the claim.

  9. Application to set aside

    The claimant applied to set aside the unless order.

  10. Hearing on application

    Regional Employment Judge Franey heard the application and refused it.

The outcome

The tribunal refused the claimant's application to set aside the unless order, meaning the dismissal of his claim stands.

Key reasons:

  • The claimant had been warned twice about his abusive language before the unless order was made.
  • He continued to use derogatory and foul language after the order, breaching it.
  • The tribunal found no good reason to reinstate the claim, given the history of non-compliance.

No compensation was awarded as the claim was dismissed.

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employment tribunals can dismiss a claim if you breach an unless order, even if the underlying claim has merit.
  • Repeated abusive or derogatory language towards the other side or the tribunal can lead to serious procedural consequences.
  • If you receive a warning about your conduct, take it seriously to avoid losing your case.
  • Applying to set aside an unless order is difficult; you must show a good reason for the breach and that it is in the interests of justice.

This case shows how a claimant's conduct can derail a potentially valid claim. The former HGV driver had been pursuing claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination since 2018, but the case never reached a final hearing on the merits. Instead, it was dismissed because he repeatedly used abusive language towards the respondent and its representatives, despite warnings and a formal unless order.

What went wrong

The tribunal had given the claimant several chances. After two written warnings in July and August 2022, Employment Judge Butler made an unless order in December 2022: stop using abusive, derogatory or foul language, or your claim will be dismissed. The claimant breached that order, and the claim was struck out in May 2023. His application to set aside the unless order was refused in December 2023.

The tribunal noted that the claimant had a history of difficult behaviour, but the key point was that he continued to use abusive language even after the unless order. The judge found no good reason to reinstate the claim, especially given the long procedural history and the fact that the claimant had been given every opportunity to comply.

What the respondent did right

George Walker Transport Manchester Limited acted promptly by seeking the unless order and drawing the breaches to the tribunal's attention. This ensured that the claim was dismissed without the need for a full hearing on the merits, saving time and costs.

Why this matters

This case is a reminder that employment tribunals expect parties to behave respectfully. While the tribunal will often make allowances for litigants in person or those with vulnerabilities, there are limits. If you are pursuing a claim, it is essential to follow tribunal orders and avoid abusive language, or you risk losing your case entirely, regardless of its merits.

Similar cases