Former HGV driver loses unfair dismissal claim after breaching unless order on abusive language
A former HGV driver's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claim was dismissed after he continued using abusive language, breaching an unless order. His application to set aside the order was refused.
1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
- #abusive-language
- #unless-order
- #dismissal
- #procedural-history
- #vulnerable-party
Key facts
- The claimant presented a claim in July 2018 for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
- The claimant repeatedly used abusive and derogatory language towards the respondent and its representatives.
- An unless order was made on 14 December 2022 requiring the claimant to cease such language.
- The claimant breached the unless order by continuing to use derogatory language.
- The claim was dismissed on 16 May 2023 due to the breach.
- The claimant's application to set aside the unless order was refused on 1 December 2023.
Timeline
-
Claim presented
The claimant presented a claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
-
Response filed
The respondent filed a response resisting all claims.
-
First case management hearing
Regional Employment Judge Franey conducted the first case management hearing.
-
Final hearing started
The final hearing began but was adjourned due to unsuitable venue.
-
Resumed hearing abandoned
The resumed hearing was abandoned due to the first Covid lockdown.
-
First warning about language
The Tribunal sent a warning letter about the claimant's use of abusive language.
-
Unless order made
Employment Judge Butler made an unless order requiring the claimant to cease abusive language.
-
Claim dismissed
Employment Judge Allen found the claimant in breach of the unless order and dismissed the claim.
-
Application to set aside
The claimant applied to set aside the unless order.
-
Hearing on application
Regional Employment Judge Franey heard the application and refused it.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether it was in the interests of justice to set aside an unless order that required the claimant to stop using abusive language, after the claim had been dismissed for breaching that order.
The outcome
The tribunal refused the claimant's application to set aside the unless order, meaning the dismissal of his claim stands.
Key reasons:
- The claimant had been warned twice about his abusive language before the unless order was made.
- He continued to use derogatory and foul language after the order, breaching it.
- The tribunal found no good reason to reinstate the claim, given the history of non-compliance.
No compensation was awarded as the claim was dismissed.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employment tribunals can dismiss a claim if you breach an unless order, even if the underlying claim has merit.
- Repeated abusive or derogatory language towards the other side or the tribunal can lead to serious procedural consequences.
- If you receive a warning about your conduct, take it seriously to avoid losing your case.
- Applying to set aside an unless order is difficult; you must show a good reason for the breach and that it is in the interests of justice.
This case shows how a claimant's conduct can derail a potentially valid claim. The former HGV driver had been pursuing claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination since 2018, but the case never reached a final hearing on the merits. Instead, it was dismissed because he repeatedly used abusive language towards the respondent and its representatives, despite warnings and a formal unless order.
What went wrong
The tribunal had given the claimant several chances. After two written warnings in July and August 2022, Employment Judge Butler made an unless order in December 2022: stop using abusive, derogatory or foul language, or your claim will be dismissed. The claimant breached that order, and the claim was struck out in May 2023. His application to set aside the unless order was refused in December 2023.
The tribunal noted that the claimant had a history of difficult behaviour, but the key point was that he continued to use abusive language even after the unless order. The judge found no good reason to reinstate the claim, especially given the long procedural history and the fact that the claimant had been given every opportunity to comply.
What the respondent did right
George Walker Transport Manchester Limited acted promptly by seeking the unless order and drawing the breaches to the tribunal's attention. This ensured that the claim was dismissed without the need for a full hearing on the merits, saving time and costs.
Why this matters
This case is a reminder that employment tribunals expect parties to behave respectfully. While the tribunal will often make allowances for litigants in person or those with vulnerabilities, there are limits. If you are pursuing a claim, it is essential to follow tribunal orders and avoid abusive language, or you risk losing your case entirely, regardless of its merits.
Similar cases
Whistleblowing claims dismissed: council's breakdown of trust was genuine
A Community Development Manager who claimed she was dismissed for whistleblowing lost her case. The tribunal found the council's decision was due to an irretrievable breakdown in working relationships, not her protected disclosures.
Delivery driver sacked with abusive language: takeaway ordered to pay £4,656
A delivery driver was unfairly dismissed after his manager told him 'I don't need you any more' and used abusive language. The Watford tribunal awarded £4,656 in compensation.
Car valet dismissed for abusive language: procedural unfairness but no compensation awarded
A car valet with six years' service was unfairly dismissed after using foul language towards a colleague, but the tribunal awarded no compensation because his conduct wholly caused his dismissal.
Former employee's claims struck out after failing to comply with tribunal order
The tribunal struck out all remaining claims brought by a former employee against London & Quadrant Housing Trust after she failed to provide required details, despite having dyslexia.
