Redundancy dismissal upheld: tribunal rejects automatic unfair dismissal claim
A former employee's claims of automatic unfair dismissal for asserting holiday rights, along with other complaints, were dismissed. The tribunal found the real reason for dismissal was redundancy due to financial savings.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimant was employed by the respondent as an employee.
- The claimant's claims of equal pay and sex discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal.
- The claimant's complaints of unauthorised deductions from wages and wrongful dismissal were dismissed upon withdrawal.
- The claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal for asserting a statutory right to holiday was dismissed.
- The tribunal found the reason for dismissal was redundancy due to financial savings and duplication of work.
Timeline
-
Claim presented
The claimant presented claims to the employment tribunal.
-
First hearing
At London South Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge L Burge dismissed claims of equal pay and sex discrimination upon withdrawal.
-
Final hearing day 1
Hearing by video at Croydon before Employment Judge Howden-Evans.
-
Final hearing day 2
Hearing continued; judgment reserved.
-
Judgment given
Employment Judge Howden-Evans dismissed all remaining claims, finding dismissal was for redundancy.
-
Reconsideration application
Claimant applied for reconsideration of the judgment.
-
Reconsideration refused
Employment Judge Howden-Evans refused the reconsideration application.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employee was automatically unfairly dismissed for asserting a statutory right to take holiday, or whether the dismissal was for a fair reason — redundancy.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all of the employee's claims, including automatic unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions, wrongful dismissal, and discrimination claims (which were withdrawn).
The key finding was that the reason for dismissal was redundancy, driven by the need for financial savings and duplication of work. The employee's assertion of holiday rights was not the reason.
No compensation was awarded as the respondent won.
Lessons & takeaways
- If you claim automatic unfair dismissal for asserting a statutory right, the tribunal will look at the real reason for dismissal — if it's redundancy, your claim will fail.
- Withdrawing claims early can save time and costs; here, equal pay and sex discrimination claims were withdrawn at the first hearing.
- A genuine redundancy situation, such as financial savings and work duplication, can be a fair reason for dismissal even if other claims are raised.
A redundancy dismissal that survived multiple challenges
This case shows what happens when an employee brings a range of claims — including automatic unfair dismissal for asserting holiday rights — but the employer can show a genuine redundancy situation. The employee had raised concerns about holiday pay, but the tribunal found that the real reason for dismissal was the company's need to make financial savings and eliminate duplicated work.
What the employer did right
Consulting and Accountancy Services Ltd was able to demonstrate that the redundancy was genuine. The tribunal accepted that the employee's role was no longer needed due to financial pressures and overlapping responsibilities. The employer also successfully defended against claims of unauthorised deductions, wrongful dismissal, and discrimination — the latter two were withdrawn by the employee before the final hearing.
Why this matters for similar claims
Employees who believe they have been dismissed for asserting a statutory right — such as the right to take holiday — need to be aware that the tribunal will look at the employer's true motive. If the employer can show a fair reason like redundancy, the claim will fail. This case also highlights the importance of focusing on the strongest claims; withdrawing weaker ones early can avoid wasted time and costs. The employee's application for reconsideration was also refused, as the tribunal found no error of law or perverse findings of fact.
Similar cases
Claims dismissed after claimants fail to attend final hearing
Two former employees who brought claims for unfair dismissal, discrimination and redundancy had their cases thrown out after failing to attend the final hearing or provide any evidence.
Healthcare assistant with 3 months' service wins wrongful dismissal claim for notice pay
A healthcare assistant who was dismissed without notice after just three months has been awarded £480 in notice pay. The tribunal rejected his other claims for automatic unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, and breach of contract.
Pregnant employee dismissed: automatic unfair dismissal after employer failed to respond
A former employee was awarded over £18,500 after being automatically unfairly dismissed due to pregnancy. The employer did not defend the claim, leading to a default judgment.
Head of Operations dismissed while on furlough after maternity leave: unfair redundancy
A tribunal found that Vespertine Holidays Ltd unfairly dismissed a Head of Operations with 16 years' service, who discovered her redundancy only when she received a P45. She was awarded £34,282.
