Partial win Employment Tribunal · 10 January 2022

Italian nurse unfairly dismissed after hospital failed to provide interpreter at disciplinary hearing

A registered nurse with limited English was unfairly dismissed for gross misconduct after the Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability failed to provide an interpreter at his disciplinary hearing. The tribunal also found indirect race discrimination.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant, an Italian nurse with limited English, was dismissed for alleged gross misconduct towards a patient.
  • The respondent's investigation was flawed and the disciplinary hearing lacked an interpreter despite the investigator's recommendation.
  • The tribunal found the respondent indirectly discriminated by failing to provide an interpreter at the disciplinary hearing.
  • The claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded notice pay, unpaid wages, and holiday pay.
  • The respondent conceded unfair dismissal and that no Polkey reduction was appropriate.

Timeline

  1. Employment start

    Claimant commenced employment as a nurse at the Royal Hospital for Neuro-Disability.

  2. Patient complaint

    Patient X emailed the respondent alleging the claimant had pulled his hair, inserted fingers in his ears/nose, tried to kiss him, and accused him of being gay.

  3. Suspension

    Claimant suspended on full pay pending investigation into allegations of gross misconduct.

  4. Investigation meeting

    Claimant attended investigation meeting without an interpreter; he denied the allegations but admitted to discussing nose hair and asking if X wanted a kiss.

  5. Investigation report

    Mr Mugwagwa completed investigation report, partially upholding allegations and recommending disciplinary action.

  6. Disciplinary hearing

    Disciplinary hearing held without an interpreter; claimant denied allegations; Ms Mill found allegation 1 substantiated.

  7. Dismissal

    Claimant summarily dismissed for gross misconduct.

  8. Tribunal hearing start

    Five-day liability hearing commenced.

  9. Judgment

    Tribunal found unfair dismissal, indirect race discrimination, breach of contract, and unlawful deductions; other claims dismissed or withdrawn.

The outcome

The tribunal found that the nurse was unfairly dismissed and that the hospital indirectly discriminated against him by failing to provide an interpreter at the disciplinary hearing. The hospital conceded unfair dismissal and that no Polkey reduction was appropriate.

The nurse also succeeded in claims for breach of contract (notice pay) and unlawful deductions from wages, including unpaid holiday pay. The following amounts were ordered:

  • Unpaid wages: £247.69 gross
  • Holiday pay: £509.23 gross

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employers should provide interpreters for disciplinary hearings when an employee's English is limited, especially if recommended by the investigator.
  • Failing to provide reasonable adjustments for language barriers can lead to findings of indirect race discrimination.
  • A flawed investigation and failure to follow internal recommendations can undermine a dismissal for gross misconduct.
  • Employees with limited English should request an interpreter at all stages of a disciplinary process.

What this case shows in practice

This case highlights the importance of ensuring fair process for employees who are not native English speakers. The nurse, an Italian registered nurse working night shifts on a neuro-disability ward, was suspended after a patient complained about his conduct. Despite the investigator recommending an interpreter for the disciplinary hearing, the hospital did not provide one. The tribunal found that this failure put the nurse at a substantial disadvantage compared to native English speakers, amounting to indirect race discrimination.

What the losing side could have done differently

The hospital could have avoided the finding of indirect discrimination by simply providing an interpreter as recommended. Additionally, the investigation was flawed in other respects: the nurse was not kept properly informed, and the decision-maker reached conclusions before the investigation was complete. A more thorough and fair process might have led to a different outcome or at least avoided the finding of unfair dismissal.

Why this result matters for similar claims

This case serves as a reminder that employers must take reasonable steps to ensure that employees with limited English can fully participate in disciplinary proceedings. Failing to do so can result in findings of discrimination and unfair dismissal, even if the underlying misconduct allegations are serious. The case also shows that tribunals will scrutinise the entire process, not just the final decision.

Similar cases

Claimant won £16,209 · Dec 2023

Dismissed without notice and discriminated against: a double blow for a former employee

A former employee was unfairly dismissed, wrongfully dismissed without notice, and discriminated against on grounds of sex. The tribunal awarded £16,208.68, including an uplift for the employer's failure to follow the ACAS code.

unfair-dismissalsex-discriminationwrongful-dismissal
Partial win £3,336 · Dec 2023

Dismissed after raising health and safety concerns: a partial win for the employee

A former employee of Ian Henery Solicitors Ltd was initially found to be unfairly dismissed for raising health and safety concerns, but the unfair dismissal judgment was later revoked. The tribunal confirmed wrongful dismissal and awarded £3,336 in total.

health-safetyunfair-dismissalwrongful-dismissal
Partial win £12,503 · Nov 2023

Unfair dismissal and unpaid wages: former employee awarded £12,503

A former employee has been awarded £12,503 after an employment tribunal found she was unfairly dismissed, not given notice, and had wages unlawfully deducted by RR Swami Ltd.

unlawful-deduction-from-wageswrongful-dismissalunfair-dismissal
Claimant won £12,651 · Nov 2023

Redundancy without process: food sales assistant awarded £12,651 after unfair dismissal

A food sales assistant dismissed by a butchers that went into liquidation has won £12,651 for unfair dismissal, redundancy and wrongful dismissal after the tribunal found the employer failed to follow proper procedures.

redundancyunfair-dismissalwrongful-dismissal