Night concierge dismissed for acting as employee representative wins automatically unfair dismissal claim
A night concierge was automatically unfairly dismissed by Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited after being elected as an employee representative under TUPE regulations. The tribunal awarded £7,674.80 in compensation.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #employee-representative
- #automatically-unfair-dismissal
- #breach-of-contract
- #holiday-pay
- #liquidation
Key facts
- Mr Sinnott was employed as a night concierge by Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited.
- He was elected as an employee representative in relation to TUPE regulations.
- The respondent entered creditors' voluntary liquidation and its response was struck out.
- The tribunal found the reason for dismissal was Mr Sinnott's role as employee representative.
- Mr Sinnott was awarded £7,674.80 in total compensation.
Timeline
-
Bubble notifies staff of replacement
Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited emailed staff that Evolution was replacing it for all Elliot Group properties, stating TUPE would apply.
-
Nationwide takes physical control
Nationwide Facilities Management Limited took over physical control of the properties, and Bubble staff were refused entry.
-
Email regarding employee representative
Claire Howard of the respondent sent an email referencing Mr Sinnott's role as employee representative.
-
Employment ended
Mr Sinnott's employment with Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited ceased.
-
Preliminary hearing day 1
Employment Tribunal hearing on TUPE transfer issues; claimants gave evidence.
-
Preliminary hearing day 2
Further evidence and submissions on TUPE transfer.
-
Preliminary hearing day 3
Resumed hearing for additional evidence and cross-examination.
-
Reserved judgment on TUPE
Employment Judge McDonald issued judgment that no TUPE transfer occurred; claims against second and third respondents dismissed.
-
Rule 21 judgment
Judgment in favour of Mr Sinnott for automatically unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and holiday pay; total award £7,674.80.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the night concierge was automatically unfairly dismissed because he performed duties as an employee representative under TUPE regulations, and whether he was entitled to notice pay and holiday pay.
The outcome
The tribunal ruled in favour of the night concierge, finding that his dismissal was automatically unfair due to his role as an employee representative. The respondent had entered liquidation and its response was struck out, leading to a default judgment.
Compensation breakdown:
- Basic award: £6,408.00
- Compensatory award: £500.00
- Total: £7,674.80
Lessons & takeaways
- Employees elected as representatives under TUPE regulations are protected from dismissal for carrying out those duties.
- If an employer enters liquidation, the tribunal can still proceed and issue a default judgment if the employer fails to respond.
- Automatically unfair dismissal claims do not require a minimum length of service to bring a claim.
- Representatives should keep evidence of their election and any communications about their role.
What this case shows
This case illustrates the protection afforded to employee representatives under TUPE regulations. The night concierge was elected to represent colleagues during a potential transfer of employment, a role that carries legal safeguards. When the employer, Urbanbubble Liverpool Limited, dismissed him shortly after he took on that role, the tribunal found the dismissal was automatically unfair.
The employer had entered creditors' voluntary liquidation and did not defend the claim, leading to a default judgment. This highlights that even if an employer becomes insolvent, employees can still pursue claims and obtain compensation.
What the employer could have done differently
The employer could have avoided liability by respecting the claimant's role as a representative and not taking any adverse action against him for performing those duties. Had the employer continued to trade, it should have sought legal advice before dismissing an employee representative.
Why this matters
This case reinforces that the right to be an employee representative is a protected status. Employees who are elected should be aware that they cannot be dismissed or subjected to detriment for carrying out their representative functions. The compensation awarded, though modest, reflects the seriousness of the breach.
For employees in similar situations, it is important to document all communications about your representative role and any subsequent treatment by your employer. Even if your employer goes into liquidation, you may still be able to obtain a judgment and potentially recover compensation through the Insolvency Service.
Similar cases
Whistleblower dismissed after raising concerns: automatically unfair dismissal and unpaid wages
A former employee was automatically unfairly dismissed after making a public interest disclosure. The tribunal also found she was owed unpaid salary, holiday pay, and expenses, awarding a total of £4,619.01.
Café worker automatically unfairly dismissed for asserting right to written contract
A café worker with only six months' service was automatically unfairly dismissed after asking for a written contract. The tribunal awarded over £2,000 including injury to feelings for age discrimination.
Unfair dismissal but 100% Polkey reduction due to workplace closure
A former employee was unfairly dismissed but received only limited compensation because the tribunal found he would have been fairly dismissed a month later when the workplace closed. Total award: £12,419.29.
Kitchen manager dismissed without consultation in redundancy: unfair dismissal
A kitchen manager with two years' service was unfairly dismissed when her employer made her redundant without any consultation or warning. The tribunal awarded £4,809.49 in compensation.
