NHS employee unfairly dismissed for conduct: 50% reduction for contributory fault
An NHS employee was unfairly dismissed but had her compensation cut by 50% for contributory conduct. Her race discrimination claims were dismissed.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #unfair-dismissal
- #direct-race-discrimination
- #indirect-race-discrimination
- #contributory-conduct
- #acas-code-uplift
Key facts
- The claimant was employed by the respondent NHS Trust.
- The claimant was dismissed by the respondent.
- The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair.
- The claimant contributed to her dismissal by 50%.
- The claims of direct and indirect race discrimination were dismissed.
Timeline
-
Hearing begins
The substantive hearing commenced via Cloud Video Platform.
-
Judgment issued
The tribunal issued its liability judgment finding unfair dismissal but dismissing race discrimination claims.
-
Consent order for remedy
The parties agreed a remedy of £32,056.58, including a 50% reduction for contributory conduct.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the NHS Trust unfairly dismissed the employee and whether she suffered direct or indirect race discrimination.
The outcome
The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair, but the employee contributed 50% to her dismissal. Her claims of direct and indirect race discrimination were dismissed.
Compensation:
- Basic award: £5,491.75 (after 50% reduction from £10,983.49)
- Compensatory award: £26,564.83 (capped at 52 weeks' gross pay)
- Total: £32,056.58
Lessons & takeaways
- Even if an employee has contributed to their dismissal, the employer must still follow a fair procedure.
- Race discrimination claims are difficult to prove without direct evidence of discriminatory motive.
- Compensation for unfair dismissal can be significantly reduced if the employee's own conduct contributed to the dismissal.
- The ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary procedures should be followed; failure to do so can lead to an uplift in compensation.
This case shows how an employer's failure to follow a fair procedure can render a conduct dismissal unfair, even when the employee's own behaviour was a contributing factor. The NHS employee was dismissed following a disciplinary process, but the tribunal found that the process was flawed, making the dismissal unfair. However, the employee's conduct was found to have contributed 50% to her dismissal, so her compensation was reduced accordingly.
The employer, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, could have avoided this outcome by ensuring a more thorough and fair investigation and disciplinary process. The tribunal's decision highlights that even where an employee has acted wrongly, the employer must still act reasonably in the way it handles the dismissal.
For employees considering a similar claim, this case underscores the importance of gathering evidence of procedural failings, such as failure to follow the ACAS Code or the employer's own policies. It also serves as a reminder that race discrimination claims require strong evidence of discriminatory treatment, as these claims were dismissed here. The 50% reduction for contributory conduct also illustrates that compensation can be substantially reduced if the employee's own actions played a part in the dismissal.
Similar cases
Unfair dismissal win: ACAS Code breach and contributory conduct
A former employee was unfairly dismissed by UK Windows & Doors Group Limited. The tribunal increased compensation for the company's failure to follow the ACAS Code but reduced it due to the employee's own blameworthy conduct.
Unfair dismissal after unreasonable disciplinary procedure: £2,373 awarded despite employee's own conduct
A former employee was unfairly dismissed after Fyfe Mcdade Ltd applied an unreasonable disciplinary procedure. The tribunal awarded £2,373.20, reduced by 50% for the employee's own conduct.
Dismissed for being 'too expensive' after TUPE transfer: unfair dismissal win
A director with 16 years' service was dismissed days after being told he was 'too expensive' and 'no longer needed'. The tribunal found the real reason was not misconduct but cost-cutting, and awarded £61,298.
Dismissed without notice for conduct: a case where process and appeal mattered
A former employee was unfairly and wrongfully dismissed after a disciplinary hearing. The tribunal awarded £3,210 but reduced compensation due to the employee's conduct and failure to appeal.
