Claimant won £1,497 awarded Employment Tribunal · 4 November 2022

Dismissed by a company in liquidation: unpaid wages and holiday pay claims succeed

A former employee won claims for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and unlawful deduction of wages (holiday pay and underpayment of salary) against Kirkby Blinds Direct Limited, which was in voluntary liquidation. The tribunal awarded £1,497.36.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed by the respondent.
  • The respondent was in voluntary liquidation.
  • The claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages (holiday pay), and unlawful deduction from wages (underpayment of salary).
  • The claimant received payments from the Redundancy Payment Office for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and holiday pay.
  • The claimant did not have a written statement of terms and conditions.
  • The respondent did not attend the hearing.

Timeline

  1. Hearing and judgment

    The Employment Tribunal held a hearing via CVP in Manchester. Employment Judge Anderson issued a judgment finding the complaints of unfair dismissal, notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages (holiday pay), and unlawful deduction from wages (underpayment of salary) well founded.

  2. Judgment sent to parties

    The written judgment was sent to the parties.

The outcome

The tribunal upheld all four complaints: unfair dismissal, notice pay, unlawful deduction from wages (holiday pay), and unlawful deduction from wages (underpayment of salary).

However, no additional sums were awarded for unfair dismissal, notice pay, or holiday pay because the claimant had already received payments from the Redundancy Payment Office. The respondent was ordered to pay:

  • £465.36 for underpayment of salary (net)
  • £1,032.00 for failure to provide a written statement of terms (two weeks' gross pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002)
  • Total: £1,497.36

Lessons & takeaways

  • Even if an employer enters liquidation, employees can still pursue claims at an employment tribunal for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and unfair dismissal.
  • If you receive payments from the Redundancy Payment Office for certain claims, the tribunal may not award additional compensation for those same claims, but you can still seek a declaration that the complaints are well founded.
  • Employers must provide a written statement of terms and conditions; failure to do so can result in a penalty of two weeks' gross pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.

When a company goes into liquidation

This case shows that employees can still bring tribunal claims even when their employer has entered voluntary liquidation. The former employee of Kirkby Blinds Direct Limited successfully argued that they were unfairly dismissed and that the company had unlawfully deducted wages, including holiday pay and underpayment of salary.

What the tribunal decided

The tribunal upheld all four complaints. However, because the employee had already received payments from the Redundancy Payment Office for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and holiday pay, the tribunal did not order additional compensation for those specific claims. Instead, it focused on the underpayment of salary and the employer's failure to provide a written statement of terms.

The company was ordered to pay £465.36 for the underpayment of salary and £1,032.00 for the breach of section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, which requires employers to give employees a written statement of their terms and conditions.

What this means for similar claims

This case highlights the importance of the Redundancy Payment Office as a safety net when an employer becomes insolvent. Employees should be aware that they can still obtain a tribunal judgment even if the employer cannot pay, and that the failure to provide a written statement of terms is a separate breach that carries its own penalty.

For employers, the case is a reminder that liquidation does not extinguish all employment law obligations. Even in financial difficulty, proper procedures must be followed, and basic requirements like providing written terms cannot be ignored.

Similar cases