Claim dismissed Employment Tribunal · 12 December 2022

Former governor's claims dismissed as out of time despite threats to children

A tribunal dismissed a former school governor's unfair dismissal and detriment claims because he waited too long to bring them, even though threats to expel his children initially made it impossible to act.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was a governor at Dolphin School from 1 January 2005 until his dismissal on 13 April 2019.
  • The claimant alleged he made protected disclosures and was dismissed and subjected to detriments.
  • The last alleged detriment occurred in October 2019 when the respondent threatened to expel the claimant's children.
  • The claimant did not commence ACAS early conciliation until 24 November 2021, over two years after the dismissal.
  • The tribunal found the threats made it not reasonably practicable to bring claims within the primary time limit.
  • However, the claimant failed to bring claims within a reasonable period after the threats ceased in July 2020.

Timeline

  1. Claimant became governor

    The claimant started as a governor at Dolphin School.

  2. Dismissal

    The claimant was dismissed from his role as governor.

  3. Threat to expel children

    The respondent threatened to expel the claimant's children if he caused difficulties; this was the last alleged detriment.

  4. Children left school

    The claimant's children left Dolphin School, removing the threat of expulsion.

  5. Complaints to authorities

    The claimant complained to Thames Valley Police, Wokingham Borough Council, and the Independent Schools Inspectorate.

  6. Legal advice received

    The claimant learned from a lawyer that time limits could be extended.

  7. ACAS early conciliation started

    The claimant commenced ACAS early conciliation.

  8. Early conciliation concluded

    ACAS early conciliation ended.

  9. Claim issued

    The claimant presented his claim to the Employment Tribunal.

  10. Preliminary hearing

    The tribunal heard the time limit issue and dismissed the claims as out of time.

The outcome

The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims as out of time.

  • The claimant was dismissed in April 2019 and the last alleged detriment (a threat to expel his children) occurred in October 2019.
  • He did not start ACAS early conciliation until November 2021, over two years after dismissal.
  • The tribunal accepted that the threat made it not reasonably practicable to bring claims earlier, but ruled that once the children left the school in July 2020, the threat ceased. The claimant then had a reasonable period to act, but he waited over a year to start early conciliation.
  • No compensation was awarded as the claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Lessons & takeaways

  • If you face threats or pressure that prevent you from bringing a tribunal claim, you must act promptly once the pressure is removed.
  • Time limits for unfair dismissal and detriment claims are strict — typically three months minus one day from the act you complain about.
  • ACAS early conciliation must be started before the time limit expires; it pauses the clock but does not reset it.
  • Seeking legal advice early can help you understand time limits and any possible extensions.
  • Even if it was not reasonably practicable to bring a claim in time, you must still bring it within a reasonable further period — what is reasonable depends on the circumstances.

A long-serving governor caught out by the clock

This case shows how even sympathetic facts — a 14-year governor dismissed after raising concerns, followed by a threat to expel his children — cannot save a claim if the claimant waits too long to bring it. The tribunal accepted that the threat to expel his children made it genuinely impossible for the claimant to issue proceedings while his children were still at the school. But once they left in July 2020, that obstacle disappeared.

The claimant then spent over a year complaining to the police, the council, and the schools inspectorate before finally starting ACAS early conciliation in November 2021. The tribunal ruled that a reasonable person in his position would have acted sooner — perhaps within a few months — and that the delay was too long.

What the respondent did right

The school and its LLP did not contest that the threat had made it not reasonably practicable to bring claims earlier. But they successfully argued that the claimant had not acted within a reasonable period after the threat ended. The tribunal agreed, noting that the claimant had received legal advice in September 2021 that time limits could be extended, yet still waited another two months to start early conciliation.

Why this matters for similar claims

Employment tribunal time limits are unforgiving. Even where there is a good reason for an initial delay, claimants must move quickly once the reason disappears. This case is a reminder that complaining to other bodies — police, regulators, councils — does not pause the tribunal clock. If you intend to bring a claim, you should start ACAS early conciliation as soon as you are able, and certainly within a few months of the obstacle being removed.

Similar cases