Emergency Medical Technician dismissed for sexual comments about children: dismissal fair
A tribunal has upheld the dismissal of an Emergency Medical Technician who made crude sexual remarks about children and showed colleagues photographs of children in a swimming pool. The employer's investigation and decision were within the range of reasonable responses.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #gross-misconduct
- #sexual-comments
- #photographs-of-children
- #safeguarding-concerns
- #scouts-uk
- #range-of-reasonable-responses
Key facts
- The claimant was an Emergency Medical Technician employed by the respondent from 30 August 2016 until dismissal on 7 September 2022.
- The claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct after allegations of making inappropriate sexual comments and showing photographs of children to colleagues.
- The allegations included crude remarks about children, showing photos of children in a swimming pool, and expressing views about paedophilia.
- The disciplinary hearing found the allegations proven and dismissed the claimant summarily.
- The appeal panel upheld the dismissal, finding the sanction within the range of reasonable responses.
- The Employment Tribunal found the dismissal fair, as the respondent had a genuine belief in the misconduct and carried out a reasonable investigation.
Timeline
-
Employment commenced
Claimant started work as an Emergency Medical Technician for the respondent.
-
Disagreement with colleague
Claimant and colleague Simon Evens had a disagreement over a patient management plan, which was later resolved through mediation.
-
Complaint made
Simon Evens emailed a formal complaint about the claimant's conduct, including crude remarks and showing photos of children.
-
Claimant suspended
Claimant was suspended pending a disciplinary investigation into the allegations.
-
Invitation to disciplinary hearing
Claimant was invited to a disciplinary hearing scheduled for 7 September 2022.
-
Disciplinary hearing and dismissal
The disciplinary hearing found the allegations proven and summarily dismissed the claimant for gross misconduct.
-
Dismissal letter sent
The respondent sent the claimant a letter confirming dismissal.
-
Early Conciliation started
Claimant entered into Early Conciliation with Acas.
-
Appeal hearing
The appeal panel heard the claimant's appeal against dismissal.
-
Appeal rejected
The appeal panel upheld the dismissal and sent a letter rejecting the appeal.
-
Claim presented
Claimant presented a claim of unfair dismissal to the Employment Tribunal.
-
Tribunal hearing
The Employment Tribunal heard the case and dismissed the claim.
-
Judgment issued
The Tribunal issued its judgment finding the dismissal fair.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant for gross misconduct, specifically whether the investigation was adequate, the belief in misconduct was genuine, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the claim of unfair dismissal, finding that the respondent fairly dismissed the claimant for gross misconduct.
The key reasons were:
- The respondent had a genuine belief that the claimant made inappropriate sexual comments about children and showed photographs of children to colleagues.
- The respondent carried out a reasonable investigation, including suspending the claimant and holding a disciplinary hearing.
- The decision to dismiss was within the range of reasonable responses for an employer in the NHS ambulance service, given the serious nature of the allegations involving safeguarding concerns.
No compensation was awarded as the dismissal was fair.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers should take allegations of inappropriate comments about children seriously and conduct a thorough investigation, including suspension if warranted.
- A fair disciplinary process, including a hearing and appeal, can protect an employer's decision from being overturned by a tribunal.
- Employees in roles involving vulnerable groups should be aware that off-duty conduct or comments about children can lead to dismissal if they affect trust and confidence.
When workplace comments cross the line
This case shows how seriously employers, particularly in healthcare and emergency services, treat allegations involving inappropriate comments about children. The claimant, an Emergency Medical Technician with six years' service, was dismissed after a colleague reported that he had made crude sexual remarks about children and shown photographs of children in a swimming pool, taken during his voluntary work as a swimming instructor.
The tribunal found that the employer, North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust, acted reasonably throughout. It suspended the claimant pending investigation, held a disciplinary hearing where the allegations were considered, and gave the claimant an opportunity to appeal. The appeal panel upheld the dismissal, finding that the sanction was within the range of reasonable responses.
What the employer did right
The key to the tribunal's decision was the employer's process. It had a genuine belief in the misconduct based on the complaint and the claimant's own admissions. The investigation was reasonable, and the decision to dismiss was one that a reasonable employer could have taken. The tribunal noted that the allegations involved safeguarding concerns, which are particularly serious in an NHS trust.
What this means for similar claims
For employees, this case is a reminder that comments about children, even if made in a private conversation, can have serious consequences if they become known to an employer. For employers, it shows that a fair process—suspension, investigation, hearing, and appeal—can defend a dismissal even when the employee has several years of service. The outcome might have been different if the employer had not followed a proper procedure or if the allegations were less serious.
Similar cases
Packing operator dismissed for leaving early without permission: dismissal fair despite inconsistent colleague treatment
An employment tribunal has upheld the dismissal of a packing operator with 11 years' service who left work early without authorisation and was found to have been dishonest about his start time. No compensation was awarded.
22-year service host dismissed for theft: Asda's decision upheld as fair
An employment tribunal has upheld Asda's dismissal of a service host with 22 years' service after CCTV showed her taking coins and bags for life without paying. The tribunal found the decision was within the range of reasonable responses.
Security officer dismissed for leaving post: unauthorised absences justified gross misconduct
A security officer with six years' service was fairly dismissed after CCTV footage showed he left his post without authorisation on multiple occasions. The tribunal rejected his unfair dismissal claim.
Assistant store manager dismissed for manipulating time-recording system: dismissal fair
An assistant store manager who allowed a colleague to work without clocking in and later falsified time records was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct. The tribunal rejected her claim that lack of training excused the manipulation of the Kronos system.
