22-year service host dismissed for theft: Asda's decision upheld as fair
An employment tribunal has upheld Asda's dismissal of a service host with 22 years' service after CCTV showed her taking coins and bags for life without paying. The tribunal found the decision was within the range of reasonable responses.
1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
- #theft
- #cctv-evidence
- #trade-union-activities
- #gross-misconduct
- #range-of-reasonable-responses
Key facts
- The claimant worked as a service host at Asda's Beckton store from 2001 until dismissal.
- CCTV footage showed the claimant taking coins from a drawer and Bags for Life without paying on multiple occasions.
- The claimant was a GMB trade union representative and had engaged in trade union activities.
- The disciplinary process found the claimant guilty of gross misconduct and she was summarily dismissed.
- The appeal against dismissal was not upheld.
Timeline
-
Employment commenced
Claimant started working for Asda Stores Limited as a service host.
-
Became trade union representative
Claimant became a representative for the GMB trade union.
-
First coin-taking incident
CCTV showed claimant taking coins from the drawer without permission.
-
Second coin-taking incident
CCTV showed claimant taking coins from the drawer, appearing to wait until colleagues left.
-
Trade union activity incident
Claimant was allowed to attend to a colleague needing reasonable adjustments.
-
Final note for lateness
Claimant received a final note for being two minutes late due to a trade union call.
-
First investigation meeting
Investigation meeting started but adjourned as claimant wanted a union rep.
-
Disciplinary hearing
Mr Palmer chaired the hearing; claimant represented by Mr Hall.
-
Dismissal confirmed
Claimant dismissed for gross misconduct (theft).
-
Appeal hearing
Appeal heard by Mr Khan; not upheld.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed (both ordinary and automatically unfair due to trade union activities) and wrongfully dismissed, focusing on whether the employer had a fair reason and followed a fair procedure.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all claims, finding that Asda had a fair reason for dismissal (conduct) and followed a fair procedure.
- The CCTV evidence clearly showed the claimant taking coins from a drawer and bags for life without paying on multiple occasions.
- The disciplinary process was thorough, with a hearing and appeal, and the decision to dismiss for gross misconduct was within the range of reasonable responses.
- The claimant's trade union activities were not the reason for dismissal; the dismissal was solely due to the proven theft.
- No compensation was awarded.
Lessons & takeaways
- Clear CCTV evidence of theft can justify summary dismissal even for long-serving employees.
- Employers should ensure a fair disciplinary process, including investigation, hearing, and appeal, to defend against unfair dismissal claims.
- Trade union activities do not protect an employee from dismissal where there is clear evidence of gross misconduct.
- Employees should be aware that taking small items or cash without permission can be treated as gross misconduct, regardless of length of service.
What this case shows in practice
This case demonstrates that even an employee with 22 years of unblemished service can be fairly dismissed for theft if the employer has clear evidence. The claimant, a service host at Asda's Beckton store, was captured on CCTV taking coins from a drawer and bags for life without paying on several occasions. Despite her long service and role as a trade union representative, the tribunal found that Asda's decision to dismiss for gross misconduct was reasonable.
What the losing side could have done differently
The claimant argued that her trade union activities had led to unfair treatment, but the tribunal found no evidence to support this. The CCTV footage was unambiguous, and the disciplinary process included a hearing and an appeal. To have succeeded, the claimant would have needed to show that the employer's belief in her guilt was unreasonable or that the procedure was flawed. In this case, the employer's thorough investigation and clear evidence made dismissal inevitable.
Why the result matters for similar claims
This case reinforces that employers can rely on clear evidence, such as CCTV, to justify dismissal for gross misconduct. It also shows that trade union activities do not provide immunity from disciplinary action where there is proven misconduct. For employees, it is a reminder that even minor theft can have serious consequences, regardless of length of service or union role.
Similar cases
Milk theft on CCTV: dismissal upheld as fair despite inconsistent explanations
An employment tribunal has upheld the dismissal of a milk delivery driver who was caught on CCTV removing milk from customers' doorsteps. The respondent's investigation and decision were within the range of reasonable responses.
Security officer dismissed for leaving post: unauthorised absences justified gross misconduct
A security officer with six years' service was fairly dismissed after CCTV footage showed he left his post without authorisation on multiple occasions. The tribunal rejected his unfair dismissal claim.
Security officer dismissed for feinting punch at cadet: tribunal upholds gross misconduct decision
A security officer who feinted a punch at a cadet after being sworn at was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct. The tribunal rejected his claim that a colleague was treated more leniently for a similar incident.
32-year manager dismissed for selling £20 of Royal Mail PPE: dismissal fair
A manager with 32 years' service was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct after selling Royal Mail PPE worth £20 on a local website. The tribunal upheld the dismissal, finding the employer's investigation and decision were within the range of reasonable responses.