Unfair dismissal for conduct but 100% reduction: procedural failures still cost employer
A former employee was unfairly dismissed for gross misconduct, but the tribunal reduced compensation to zero because her own conduct caused the dismissal. However, the employer was ordered to pay £576 for failing to provide written reasons and a statement of terms.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #unfair-dismissal
- #wrongful-dismissal
- #written-statement
- #breach-of-contract
- #contributory-conduct
- #polkey-no-difference
Key facts
- The claimant was dismissed on 17 August 2021.
- The respondent did not provide written reasons for dismissal within 14 days.
- The respondent failed to provide a section 1 statement of terms and conditions.
- The claimant's conduct was found to be culpable and blameworthy, causing her dismissal.
- The claimant committed a repudiatory breach of contract entitling summary termination.
- The claimant withdrew a claim under the Working Time Regulations.
Timeline
-
Dismissal
The claimant was dismissed by the respondent.
-
14-day deadline for written reasons
The respondent failed to provide written reasons for dismissal within 14 days.
-
First day of hearing
Employment Tribunal hearing commenced via CVP.
-
Second day of hearing and judgment
Tribunal concluded hearing and issued judgment.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the dismissal was unfair, whether the employee was entitled to notice pay, and whether the employer failed to provide required written statements.
The outcome
The tribunal ruled that the former employee was unfairly dismissed due to the employer's failure to provide written reasons for dismissal within 14 days. However, it also found that her own conduct was culpable and blameworthy, and that she would have been dismissed in any event under the Polkey 'no difference' rule. As a result, compensation was reduced by 100%.
- £576 total award, comprising:
- 2 weeks' pay for failure to provide written reasons for dismissal
- 4 weeks' pay for failure to provide a section 1 written statement of terms and conditions
- The claim for wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was dismissed because the employee committed a repudiatory breach of contract.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must provide written reasons for dismissal within 14 days, even if the dismissal is for gross misconduct.
- A failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions can result in a separate award of up to 4 weeks' pay.
- Even if a dismissal is procedurally unfair, compensation can be reduced to zero if the employee's own conduct caused the dismissal.
- Employees who commit a repudiatory breach of contract are not entitled to notice pay, even if the dismissal process was flawed.
What this case shows in practice
This case highlights how procedural failures can lead to a finding of unfair dismissal, even when the employee's own conduct was the real reason for the termination. The former employee was dismissed for gross misconduct, but the employer failed to provide written reasons within the 14-day statutory period. That technical breach was enough to make the dismissal unfair, though the tribunal made clear that the employee's behaviour was culpable and blameworthy.
What the losing side could have done differently
The employer could have avoided the unfair dismissal finding simply by providing written reasons for the dismissal on time. The failure to do so was a straightforward procedural error. Additionally, the employer did not provide a written statement of terms and conditions, which led to an extra award of 4 weeks' pay. Both of these are basic legal requirements that any employer should have in place.
Why the result matters for similar claims
For employees, this case is a reminder that procedural errors can win an unfair dismissal claim even when the underlying conduct is serious. However, compensation may still be wiped out if the employee's own actions caused the dismissal. For employers, it shows that failing to follow statutory procedures — even in clear-cut misconduct cases — can result in a finding of unfairness and additional awards. The total award here was modest (£576), but the reputational and time costs of defending a tribunal claim are far higher.
Similar cases
Dismissed without notice for conduct: a case where process and appeal mattered
A former employee was unfairly and wrongfully dismissed after a disciplinary hearing. The tribunal awarded £3,210 but reduced compensation due to the employee's conduct and failure to appeal.
Bus driver unfairly dismissed but award slashed by 75% for own conduct
A bus driver was unfairly dismissed by Stagecoach Manchester, but the tribunal reduced his compensation by 75% because his own conduct contributed to the dismissal. He received a total of £4,306.62 including damages for wrongful dismissal.
Disability harassment and victimisation: former employee awarded £320,000 after employer goes into liquidation
A former employee with a disability was awarded over £320,000 after an employment tribunal found she was harassed, victimised, and unfairly dismissed by Woods Catering Staffordshire Ltd and its director.
Dismissed for misconduct: 80% reduction for blameworthy conduct
A former employee won her unfair and wrongful dismissal claims against Holland and Barrett, but an 80% reduction for contributory conduct cut her compensation to £3,407.
