Constructive dismissal after manager coughed on employee with psoriatic arthritis
An accounts assistant with psoriatic arthritis was constructively dismissed after a manager deliberately coughed in her direction when she asked for social distancing. The tribunal awarded £26,438.84.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #constructive-dismissal
- #disability-discrimination
- #victimisation
- #covid-19
- #social-distancing
- #psoriatic-arthritis
- #unfair-dismissal
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as Accounts Assistant/Property Manager from 14 December 2017 to 13 June 2020.
- She had psoriatic arthritis, a disability known to the respondents.
- On 17 March 2020, R2 deliberately coughed in her direction, ridiculing her request for social distancing due to her vulnerability.
- The claimant resigned on 13 June 2020, citing an untenable working environment.
- The tribunal found she was constructively unfairly dismissed, victimised, and discriminated against because of something arising from disability.
- Other claims including race and sex harassment were dismissed.
Timeline
-
Employment commenced
Claimant started work as Accounts Assistant/Property Manager for R1.
-
First resignation
Claimant resigned for alternative employment after pay increase request rejected, but withdrew after improved package.
-
Disability knowledge confirmed
Tribunal found respondents knew or ought to have known of claimant's disability by mid-February 2020.
-
Coughing incident
R2 deliberately coughed in claimant's direction, ridiculing her social distancing request due to her disability.
-
Redundancy warning
R3 gave claimant a 'heads up' about potential redundancies, stating she was at risk.
-
Telephone call from R2
R2 suggested reorganisation and reduction in hours/duties for claimant.
-
Grievance email
Claimant sent email titled 'Work Issues' complaining about R2's conduct, disability discrimination, and other matters.
-
Resignation
Claimant resigned by email, citing untenable working environment and constructive dismissal.
-
Liability judgment
Tribunal found constructive unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and victimisation; other claims dismissed.
-
Remedy judgment
Tribunal awarded £26,438.84 total compensation, later corrected to include past losses.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant was constructively dismissed and discriminated against because of her disability after a manager ridiculed her request for social distancing and the employer failed to address her grievance.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of constructive unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and victimisation. Other claims including race and sex harassment were dismissed.
Compensation:
- Basic award: £990.00
- Compensatory award: £1,691.94
- Total: £26,438.84 (including other heads not specified)
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must take disability-related requests seriously, especially during a pandemic, and not ridicule or victimise employees who raise concerns.
- A constructive dismissal claim can succeed if the employer's conduct is so serious that it fundamentally breaches the employment contract, forcing the employee to resign.
- Victimisation occurs when an employee is treated unfavourably because they have made a protected act, such as raising a grievance about discrimination.
- Even without a formal grievance outcome, the employer's failure to address complaints can contribute to a finding of constructive dismissal.
What happened
The claimant, an accounts assistant and property manager with psoriatic arthritis, was working for Cawdor Cars (Newcastle Emlyn) Ltd. In March 2020, as the COVID-19 pandemic began, she asked a director (R2) to maintain social distancing because of her vulnerability. In response, R2 deliberately coughed in her direction, ridiculing her request. The tribunal found this was directly linked to her disability.
Over the following weeks, the situation deteriorated. The claimant was warned about potential redundancy and her duties were reduced. When she emailed a grievance on 2 June 2020, she was met with a response that the tribunal found to be victimisation. She resigned on 13 June 2020, citing an untenable working environment.
What the tribunal decided
The tribunal found that the coughing incident and the subsequent treatment amounted to constructive unfair dismissal and discrimination arising from disability. The employer's failure to properly address her grievance and the victimisation she suffered after raising it were key factors. The tribunal noted that the employer's witnesses were not wholly straightforward and downplayed events.
Lessons for similar cases
This case shows that employers must take disability-related requests seriously, especially during a public health crisis. Ridiculing an employee's reasonable request for social distancing can amount to disability discrimination. It also highlights that victimisation can occur when an employee is penalised for raising a grievance about discrimination. For employees, this case demonstrates that resigning in response to a fundamental breach of contract can lead to a successful constructive dismissal claim, even without a formal grievance outcome.
Similar cases
Store manager dismissed for COVID breaches: employer's response was reasonable
A tribunal has dismissed all claims of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal brought by a store manager with 7 years' service who was sacked for failing to enforce social distancing and misleading Test and Trace during the pandemic.
GP with 16 years' service wins disability harassment claim over sickness review invitation
A GP who was invited to a final sickness review meeting after shielding during the pandemic has won her claim of disability discrimination and harassment. The tribunal found the invitation was discriminatory, but dismissed her constructive dismissal claim.
Social worker's race discrimination claim over 'aggressive' stereotype dismissed
A black social worker with 15 years' service lost her claims of race discrimination and constructive dismissal after an altercation with a white colleague. The tribunal found no evidence of stereotyping or unfair treatment.
Security officer dismissed after back injury: tribunal finds unfair dismissal and disability discrimination
A security officer with six years' service was unfairly dismissed after a back injury. The tribunal also found that CIS Security Ltd failed to make reasonable adjustments and discriminated against him arising from his disability.
