Reliance on ACAS advice saved out-of-time unfair dismissal claim
A tribunal extended time for an employee who missed the claim deadline by one day after ACAS gave misleading advice about the deadline. The claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were allowed to proceed.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as an Operations Team Leader from 8 August 2019 to 30 September 2021.
- Early Conciliation began on 30 November 2021 and the certificate was issued on 10 January 2022.
- The claimant presented her claim on 11 February 2022, believing the deadline was one month from 11 January 2022 based on ACAS advice.
- The ACAS officer told the claimant she had 'at least one calendar month' from the certificate date, but did not correct her misunderstanding that the deadline was 11 February 2022.
- The tribunal found it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time due to reliance on ACAS advice.
- The time for presenting the unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims was extended to 11 February 2022.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began working as Operations Team Leader for the respondent.
-
Employment ended
Claimant's employment ended.
-
Early Conciliation started
Claimant began Early Conciliation with ACAS.
-
ACAS Certificate issued
Early Conciliation certificate was issued, dated 10 January 2022.
-
ACAS advice given
ACAS officer advised claimant she had 'one calendar month' from certificate date to submit a claim.
-
Claimant sought clarification
Claimant asked ACAS for final deadline; officer repeated 'at least one calendar month' from 11 January 2022.
-
Claimant raised concern
Claimant told ACAS internal process would end after 11 February; ACAS did not correct her understanding.
-
Claim presented
Claimant submitted her claim to the tribunal, believing it was the deadline.
-
Hearing
Employment Judge M Ord heard the strike-out application.
-
Judgment issued
Tribunal extended time and allowed claims to proceed.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims were presented out of time, and if so, whether time should be extended because it was not reasonably practicable (for unfair dismissal) or just and equitable (for discrimination) to present in time.
The outcome
The tribunal found that the claimant's claims were presented one day late, but granted an extension of time.
- The claimant relied on advice from an ACAS officer who told her she had 'at least one calendar month' from the certificate date of 11 January 2022. She understood this to mean the deadline was 11 February 2022.
- When she raised concerns about internal processes taking her past that date, ACAS did not correct her misunderstanding.
- The tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for her to present the unfair dismissal claim in time, and that it was just and equitable to extend time for the discrimination claim.
- No compensation was awarded as the claims were allowed to proceed.
Lessons & takeaways
- If you receive advice from ACAS about a deadline, confirm it in writing and double-check the actual statutory time limits yourself.
- The deadline for unfair dismissal claims is three months minus one day from the effective date of termination, adjusted for Early Conciliation.
- If you miss the deadline due to misleading advice from ACAS, the tribunal may extend time if you acted reasonably.
- Keep records of all communications with ACAS, including emails and notes of phone calls, to show what you were told.
When ACAS advice leads you astray
This case shows how a single day's delay, caused by misleading advice from ACAS, nearly cost an employee the chance to bring her claims. The claimant, an Operations Team Leader with two years' service, was told by an ACAS officer that she had 'at least one calendar month' from the date of her Early Conciliation certificate to submit a tribunal claim. She understood that to mean 11 February 2022, but the actual deadline was 10 February 2022.
When she queried the deadline because her internal grievance process was ongoing, the ACAS officer repeated the same ambiguous advice and did not correct her misunderstanding. She submitted her claim on 11 February, one day late. The respondent sought to strike out the claims as out of time.
What the losing side could have done differently
The respondent argued that the claimant should have known the correct deadline and could have sought legal advice. However, the tribunal noted that the claimant was unrepresented and had no legal knowledge. The ACAS officer's failure to correct the claimant's expressed belief that 11 February was the deadline was critical. If ACAS had simply said 'the deadline is 10 February, not 11 February,' the claim would have been on time.
Why this result matters
The tribunal extended time for both the unfair dismissal claim (on the basis that it was not reasonably practicable to present in time) and the disability discrimination claim (on just and equitable grounds). The decision highlights that tribunals will not penalise employees who rely on incorrect advice from ACAS, especially when they act promptly and the delay is minimal. For anyone considering a claim, this case is a reminder to always verify deadlines independently, but also that a short delay caused by official advice may not be fatal.
Similar cases
Former ambulance service employee's claim struck out as out of time
A former ambulance service employee had her unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims struck out after lodging them over three weeks late. She was ordered to pay £4,305.48 in costs.
Former employee's unfair dismissal claim dismissed as two days late
A former employee's unfair dismissal and most disability discrimination claims were struck out after he presented his claim two days late, due to a misunderstanding of the time limit.
Former employee's multiple claims dismissed as out of time against Al-Khair Foundation
A former employee brought claims for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and more against Al-Khair Foundation, but all were dismissed as presented too late.
Carpet fitter ordered to pay £12,950 costs after pursuing disability claim with no reasonable prospect of success
A tribunal ordered a former carpet fitter to pay £12,950 in costs after he pursued disability discrimination and unfair dismissal claims that were out of time and based on untruthful evidence. His former solicitors were also ordered to pay £1,600 in wasted costs.
