Partial win £21,936 awarded Employment Tribunal · 31 January 2023

Long-serving employee unfairly dismissed in redundancy without notice

A Cardiff tribunal found that MB Evans Limited unfairly dismissed a 25-year employee without notice during a redundancy. The employee was awarded £21,936 in compensation.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed from 1997 until 25 March 2022.
  • The respondent dismissed the claimant without notice.
  • The claimant's unfair dismissal claim succeeded.
  • The claimant's redundancy payment claim succeeded.
  • The compensatory award was reduced by 100% under Polkey.
  • The claimant was awarded a basic award of £16,800, offset by the redundancy payment.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    The claimant began working for the respondent.

  2. Effective date of termination

    The claimant was dismissed without notice.

  3. Initial judgment

    The tribunal found unfair dismissal and breach of contract, but dismissed other claims. A basic award of £16,800 and notice pay of £5,136 were ordered.

  4. Reconsideration judgment

    The tribunal substituted the initial judgment, adding a redundancy payment claim and offsetting the basic award.

The outcome

The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim and breach of contract claim. It also found the employee entitled to a redundancy payment.

  • Basic award for unfair dismissal: £16,800 (offset by redundancy payment, so £0 paid)
  • Notice pay for breach of contract: £5,136 (net)
  • Total compensation: £21,936
  • The compensatory award was reduced by 100% under Polkey, meaning no additional loss was awarded beyond the basic award and notice pay.

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employers must follow a fair redundancy process, including proper consultation and consideration of alternatives, especially for long-serving employees.
  • Dismissing an employee without notice is a breach of contract and can lead to additional compensation for notice pay.
  • Even if a redundancy is genuine, failure to follow a fair procedure can render the dismissal unfair.
  • A Polkey reduction can eliminate compensation for future loss if the employee would have been dismissed anyway with a fair process.
  • Length of service (25 years) is a key factor in the basic award calculation, which can be offset by a redundancy payment.

This case shows the importance of following a fair redundancy process, even when the employer believes the dismissal is justified. The employee had worked for MB Evans Limited for 25 years, from 1997 until March 2022, when they were dismissed without notice. The tribunal found that the dismissal was procedurally unfair, as the employer did not provide evidence of a fair consultation or proper selection criteria.

What went wrong

The employer failed to give notice and did not follow a fair redundancy procedure. The tribunal also found that the employee was entitled to a redundancy payment, which offset the basic award for unfair dismissal. The employer's failure to attend the hearing or provide representation meant the tribunal's findings were largely unchallenged.

Why the result matters

This case highlights that long-serving employees are entitled to a fair process, even in redundancy situations. The Polkey reduction (100%) meant that the employee received no compensation for future loss, but still secured the basic award and notice pay. For employees in similar situations, the key takeaway is that procedural fairness matters, and failing to follow it can lead to liability even if the redundancy was genuine.

Similar cases