Claimant won £11,871 awarded Employment Tribunal · 6 December 2023

Butcher awarded £11,871 after redundancy dismissal with no notice or holiday pay

A former butcher won £11,871 after his employer failed to pay notice, holiday pay, or a redundancy payment and did not attend the tribunal hearing.

1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed by the respondent as a butcher.
  • The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
  • The respondent failed to pay notice pay, holiday pay, and a redundancy payment.
  • The claimant's claims were presented out of time but the tribunal extended time.
  • The respondent did not attend the hearing or file a response.

Timeline

  1. Claims presented

    The claimant presented his claims for breach of contract, holiday pay, and unfair dismissal to the tribunal.

  2. Hearing

    The hearing took place remotely via CVP. The respondent was not present or represented.

  3. Judgment issued

    Employment Judge Dimbylow issued the judgment finding in favor of the claimant on all claims.

The outcome

The tribunal ruled in favour of the former employee on all claims.

The key reasons were:

  • The respondent failed to attend or file a response, so the claims were uncontested.
  • The tribunal extended time because it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to submit in time, but he did so within a reasonable period.
  • The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy without proper notice or payment.

Compensation breakdown:

  • Basic award (redundancy payment): £7,552.50
  • Notice pay (breach of contract): £1,510.25 (net)
  • Holiday pay: £2,308.50 (gross)
  • Compensatory award for unfair dismissal: £500.00 (for loss of statutory rights)
  • Total: £11,871.25

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employers must pay statutory redundancy pay, notice pay, and accrued holiday when making an employee redundant.
  • If you miss the deadline for an employment tribunal claim, you can ask for an extension if it was not reasonably practicable to file in time.
  • An employer who fails to attend a hearing or file a response will likely lose by default, and the tribunal can award the full amount claimed.
  • Keep records of your employment dates, pay, and holiday entitlement to support your claim if you are dismissed.

A redundancy dismissal that left the employee unpaid

A former butcher who was made redundant by Garbett Butchers Ltd received no notice pay, no holiday pay, and no redundancy payment from his employer. After presenting his claims to the employment tribunal late, he successfully argued that it had not been reasonably practicable to submit them on time. The tribunal agreed and extended the deadline, allowing his case to proceed.

The employer did not attend the hearing or file a response, leaving the claims uncontested. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,552.50, plus notice pay of £1,510.25 (net) and holiday pay of £2,308.50 (gross). An additional £500 was awarded for loss of statutory employment rights, bringing the total to £11,871.25.

What the employer could have done differently

Garbett Butchers Ltd could have avoided this outcome by engaging with the process. By failing to respond to the claim or attend the hearing, the employer lost the chance to challenge the amounts or argue that the dismissal was fair. Even if a redundancy is genuine, employers must still follow proper procedure and make all required payments. In this case, the lack of any response meant the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence without question.

Why this case matters

This case shows that employment tribunals will take a pragmatic approach to late claims if there is a good reason for the delay. It also highlights the importance of employers complying with their legal obligations when making redundancies. For employees, the result is a reminder that even if an employer ignores the process, the tribunal can still award compensation — and that unrepresented claimants can succeed against an absent respondent.

Similar cases