Respondent won Employment Tribunal · 6 October 2023

Finance Manager loses redundancy and discrimination claims after returning from maternity leave

An Employment Tribunal has dismissed all claims of maternity discrimination, harassment, victimisation and unfair dismissal brought by a Finance Manager who was made redundant shortly after returning from maternity leave.

1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed as a Finance Manager from 16 November 2015 until 19 August 2022.
  • She took maternity leave from January 2021 and returned on 7 February 2022.
  • The respondent restructured its finance function in May 2022, making all Finance Manager roles redundant.
  • The claimant was offered a Management Accountant role but declined it.
  • She was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 19 August 2022 after requesting early release from her notice period.
  • The tribunal found no discrimination or victimisation related to her maternity leave or protected acts.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    Claimant began working for the respondent as a Finance Manager.

  2. Child born

    Claimant gave birth and commenced maternity leave.

  3. Flexible working request

    Claimant emailed Helen Lecky about returning to work full time and altering hours for school pick-up.

  4. Flexible working meeting

    Meeting held to discuss flexible working request; claimant agreed to return to office after school pick-up on anchor days.

  5. Flexible working outcome

    Respondent confirmed flexible working arrangements, including tweaks to hours.

  6. Return from maternity leave

    Claimant returned to work after maternity leave.

  7. Sick leave started

    Claimant commenced sick leave and did not return to work.

  8. Grievance raised

    Claimant raised a grievance about her treatment on return from maternity leave.

  9. Restructuring announced

    Respondent announced a reorganisation of the finance function, putting claimant's role at risk.

  10. Dismissal

    Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy after declining alternative role.

The outcome

The tribunal dismissed all claims. It found that the respondent had a genuine need to restructure its finance function, making all Finance Manager roles redundant. The claimant was offered a suitable alternative role but declined.

  • The tribunal found no evidence that the claimant's maternity leave or flexible working request influenced the redundancy decision.
  • The grievance raised by the claimant was properly investigated and did not lead to any detriment.
  • The claimant's dismissal was by reason of redundancy following a fair process, and she requested early release from her notice period, so no wrongful dismissal occurred.
  • No compensation was awarded as all claims failed.

Lessons & takeaways

  • A genuine redundancy situation can justify dismissal even shortly after a return from maternity leave, provided the selection criteria are objective and fairly applied.
  • Raising a grievance does not automatically protect an employee from redundancy if the redundancy is genuine and unrelated to the grievance.
  • Flexible working requests must be considered properly, but a refusal may be justified if the employer has a legitimate business aim and the means are proportionate.
  • Claimants should be prepared to provide clear evidence linking any alleged detriment to a protected characteristic or protected act.

A redundancy that survived legal scrutiny

This case shows that a redundancy process carried out shortly after an employee returns from maternity leave can still be fair, provided the employer has a genuine business reason and follows a proper procedure. The Finance Manager, who had seven years' service, was made redundant as part of a wider restructure of the finance function. All Finance Manager roles were removed, and she was offered a Management Accountant position, which she declined.

The tribunal carefully examined whether the redundancy was a pretext for discrimination linked to her maternity leave or flexible working request. It concluded that the restructure was genuine and that the claimant was not singled out. The flexible working request had been granted, and there was no evidence that the redundancy decision was influenced by her maternity or her grievance.

What the employer did right

The respondent had a clear business case for the restructure and consulted with the claimant. It offered an alternative role, which she turned down. The tribunal noted that the claimant herself requested early release from her notice period to start a new job, which undermined her wrongful dismissal claim. The grievance process was also found to be adequate.

Why this matters for similar claims

Employees returning from maternity leave are protected from discrimination, but that protection does not make them immune to genuine redundancy. Employers must still follow a fair process and be able to show that the redundancy is not a sham. For claimants, this case highlights the importance of gathering evidence that directly links any adverse treatment to a protected characteristic or act. Without such evidence, even a sympathetic set of facts may not succeed at tribunal.

Similar cases