Nurse dismissed for running aesthetics business while on sick leave: no disability discrimination
A pre-assessment nurse who carried out paid Botox procedures while signed off sick was fairly dismissed for misconduct. The tribunal rejected her claims of disability discrimination and victimisation.
1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
- #disability-discrimination
- #unfair-dismissal
- #working-whilst-sick
- #attendance-management-policy
- #anonymous-nmc-referral
- #text-message-harassment
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a Pre-assessment Nurse from 17 May 2021 to 21 July 2022.
- The claimant was dismissed for misconduct after being found to have carried out paid aesthetics work while signed off sick and in receipt of NHS sick pay.
- The claimant's line manager, Francesca Beer, sent a text message referring to a third party as 'mental' on 2 January 2022.
- The claimant raised a grievance about Francesca Beer's behaviour, which was largely upheld.
- An anonymous referral was made to the NMC regarding the claimant's conduct, but the NMC decided not to investigate.
- The tribunal found that the claimant's dismissal was due to misconduct, not because of something arising from her disability.
Timeline
-
Employment start
Claimant commenced employment as a Pre-assessment Nurse with the second respondent.
-
First sickness absence
Claimant signed off for seven days with chest infection.
-
Anonymous call to HR
Second respondent received an anonymous call alleging claimant was running an aesthetics business while signed off sick.
-
Screenshots provided
Second respondent received screenshots of text messages from a member of the public who booked a Botox procedure with the claimant while she was signed off sick.
-
Text message from Miss Beer
Miss Beer sent a text to claimant referring to a third party as 'mental'.
-
Formal grievance raised
Claimant submitted a formal grievance regarding Miss Beer's behaviour.
-
Anonymous NMC referral
An anonymous referral was made to the NMC regarding the claimant's conduct.
-
Grievance outcome
Grievance outcome letter sent to claimant; allegations partially upheld.
-
Dismissal decision
Mrs Martinez decided to terminate claimant's employment at a Probationary Review Meeting.
-
Employment ended
Claimant's employment terminated on one week's notice.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the nurse's dismissal was discrimination arising from disability, whether a text message from a colleague constituted harassment related to disability, and whether she was victimised for raising a grievance and bringing proceedings.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all claims against the Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and the line manager.
The key reasons were:
- The dismissal was for misconduct (working while signed off sick), not because of her disability.
- The text message from the line manager referring to a third party as 'mental' was not related to the nurse's disability.
- There was no evidence that the anonymous referral to the NMC or the dismissal were acts of victimisation for raising a grievance.
No compensation was awarded as all claims failed.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers can dismiss for misconduct even if the employee is on sick leave, provided the reason is genuine and not linked to disability.
- A single insensitive comment by a manager does not automatically amount to harassment if it is not related to a protected characteristic.
- Raising a grievance does not give blanket protection from dismissal if there is a separate, legitimate reason for the dismissal.
- Employees with less than two years' service cannot bring unfair dismissal claims, but can still bring discrimination claims.
This case shows that even when an employee is signed off sick, they are not immune from disciplinary action if they engage in paid work without authorisation. The nurse, a pre-assessment nurse with 14 months' service, was dismissed after the Trust discovered she had been carrying out Botox and other aesthetics treatments while receiving NHS sick pay. The tribunal accepted that this was a clear breach of the Trust's policies and a misconduct issue, not a disability-related matter.
What could the Trust have done differently? The tribunal noted that the Trust followed a fair process, including a probationary review meeting where the nurse was given the opportunity to respond. The line manager's text message referring to a third party as 'mental' was found to be unprofessional but not discriminatory, as it was not aimed at the nurse or her disability. The anonymous referral to the NMC was also not linked to the nurse's protected acts.
The result matters because it reinforces that employers can take a firm line on misconduct during sick leave, as long as the decision is based on evidence and not on assumptions about the employee's disability. It also highlights the importance of keeping grievances and disciplinary processes separate: the nurse's grievance about her line manager was largely upheld, but that did not prevent the Trust from dismissing her for separate misconduct.
Similar cases
Dismissed without a meeting or appeal: a conduct case with big reductions
A former employee of Fairview Grocers Limited was unfairly dismissed without any meeting or right of appeal, but his own conduct led to a 60% cut in compensation. He was awarded £3,752.89 in total.
Claim struck out after failure to comply with tribunal orders due to ill-health
A former employee's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims against Marks and Spencer were struck out after she failed to comply with tribunal orders and did not actively pursue her claim.
Claims struck out after former employee fails to attend hearing or comply with orders
A former employee's unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims have been struck out after he failed to attend a preliminary hearing and did not comply with tribunal orders to provide evidence.
Former employee unfairly dismissed but gets only basic award after 70% contributory conduct deduction
A Watford tribunal found Mitie Ltd unfairly dismissed a former employee but reduced his basic award by 70% for his own conduct and made no compensatory award due to a 100% Polkey reduction. He received £1,298.10.
