Care manager with personality disorder harassed by 'chimp' taunt and bad reference
A registered care manager with emotionally unstable personality disorder was harassed by his employer through a derogatory 'chimp' comment, a push, and a detrimental reference. The tribunal awarded £22,966.72.
1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
- #disability-harassment
- #reasonable-adjustments
- #bad-reference
- #chimp-paradox
- #emotionally-unstable-personality-disorder
- #time-limits
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as Registered Manager from February 2020 to 18 November 2021.
- The claimant was found disabled due to emotionally unstable personality disorder with impulsive behaviour.
- The respondent knew or ought to have known of the claimant's disability by 19 August 2021.
- Mr Stewart sent a text to Ms Hearne in September 2021 referring to the claimant and his 'chimp'.
- On 18 November 2021, Mr Stewart pushed the claimant and Mrs Robinson called the claimant's wife alleging an affair.
- The respondent gave the claimant a detrimental reference causing loss of a subsequent job.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant commenced employment as Registered Manager.
-
Difficulties with colleague Lottie Rose
Working relationship with Lottie Rose deteriorated.
-
Claimant texts about mental health crisis
Claimant sent texts describing being in a dark place and self-harm.
-
Mr Stewart texts Ms Hearne about 'chimp'
Mr Stewart sent a text to Ms Hearne saying 'not like a certain person and his chimp'.
-
Mr Stewart shouts at claimant
Mr Stewart shouted at claimant, overheard by Ms Hearne.
-
Claimant walks out, push and phone call
Claimant resigned impulsively, Mr Stewart pushed him, Mrs Robinson called claimant's wife.
-
ACAS early conciliation started
Claimant commenced ACAS early conciliation.
-
Claim presented to tribunal
Claimant presented his claim to the Employment Tribunal.
-
Disability finding
Employment Judge George found claimant disabled at relevant time.
-
Final hearing (liability)
Liability hearing held over three days.
-
Liability judgment
Judgment on liability issued, harassment claims succeeded in part.
-
Remedy hearing
Remedy hearing held.
-
Remedy judgment
Total award of £22,966.72 made.
The legal issue
Whether the employer harassed the claimant because of his disability (emotionally unstable personality disorder) by sending a derogatory text, shouting, pushing, calling his wife, and giving a bad reference, and whether it failed to make reasonable adjustments by not allowing time off for medical appointments.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld some harassment claims but dismissed others. The reasonable adjustments claim was also dismissed.
Key reasons:
- The 'chimp' text and push were harassment related to disability.
- Calling the claimant's wife was not harassment as it was not related to disability.
- The bad reference was harassment as it was influenced by the claimant's disability.
- The employer did not fail to make reasonable adjustments as the claimant did not request time off for medical appointments.
Compensation:
- Total award: £22,966.72
- No breakdown provided.
Lessons & takeaways
- If you have a disability that affects your behaviour, your employer must not mock or reference it in a derogatory way – that can be harassment.
- A bad reference that is influenced by your disability can be unlawful harassment, even after employment ends.
- To succeed on a reasonable adjustments claim, you must show you made a specific request for an adjustment that the employer refused.
- Length of service matters: if you have less than two years' service, you cannot claim unfair dismissal, but you can still claim discrimination.
What this case shows in practice
This case highlights how disability harassment can take many forms, including subtle digs and post-employment actions. The claimant, a registered manager for a domiciliary care company, had emotionally unstable personality disorder, which he himself referred to as 'his chimp'. When a colleague texted about 'a certain person and his chimp', the tribunal found this was harassment related to disability – it mocked the claimant's condition. Similarly, a physical push and a bad reference that cost the claimant a job were also linked to his disability.
What the employer could have done differently
The employer could have avoided liability by taking the claimant's disability seriously. Instead of allowing a culture where a colleague could make a 'chimp' joke, they should have trained staff on disability awareness. The bad reference was particularly damaging – the tribunal found it was influenced by the claimant's disability, not his performance. Employers must ensure references are objective and not tainted by discriminatory attitudes.
Why this result matters for similar claims
This case is a reminder that disability harassment claims can succeed even where the employee has less than two years' service (so no unfair dismissal claim). It also shows that post-employment acts, like a bad reference, can be challenged. However, the claimant's reasonable adjustments claim failed because he did not formally request time off for medical appointments. Employees should make clear, written requests for adjustments to protect their rights.
Similar cases
Sales assistant with chronic kidney disease loses disability discrimination claim over furlough placement
A former nurse turned sales assistant who was placed on furlough during the pandemic due to shielding advice has lost her disability and age discrimination claims against Irvings Butchers Limited.
Warehouse operative with 9 years' service dismissed for long-term incapability: employer's process found fair
A Leeds tribunal dismissed claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination brought by a warehouse operative with chronic back pain, finding that the employer's consultation and medical evidence were reasonable.
Beauty course teacher with cluster headaches loses unfair dismissal claim after resigning
A teacher who resigned after just three months' service failed to prove she was dismissed. The tribunal found she quit voluntarily, and her disability discrimination claims did not succeed.
Race discrimination claim dismissed after social worker missed time limit
An experienced social worker's race discrimination and constructive dismissal claims against Devon County Council were dismissed because she presented her claim too late, and the tribunal refused to extend time.
