Claimant won £7,235 awarded Employment Tribunal · 30 August 2023

Worker awarded over £7,000 after equestrian centre failed to pay wages and holiday pay

A former employee of Rands Farm Equestrian Centre Ltd has been awarded £7,234.51 after the tribunal upheld claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and failure to provide pay slips or written employment particulars.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant worked 487 hours at £10 per hour but was only paid £3168.80.
  • The claimant worked 104 days and was entitled to 8 days' holiday pay.
  • The respondent failed to provide itemised pay slips for the last 13 weeks.
  • The respondent never provided a formal grievance procedure.
  • The respondent failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars.
  • The respondent acted unreasonably and failed to obey tribunal orders.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    The claimant began working for the respondent. Exact start date not specified in judgment.

  2. Employment ended

    The claimant's employment ended after 15 weeks. Exact end date not specified.

  3. Unfair dismissal complaint struck out

    Employment Judge Bright struck out the unfair dismissal complaint due to insufficient service.

  4. Consent judgment on bonus claim

    By consent, the respondent agreed to pay £500 for non-payment of a bonus. Costs judgment also issued for £344 preparation time.

  5. Final hearing

    Employment Judge James heard the remaining claims. The respondent did not appear.

  6. Judgment issued

    The tribunal upheld claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, failure to provide pay slips, and failure to provide statement of particulars. Total award £7234.51 including ACAS uplift and preparation time.

The outcome

The tribunal upheld the former employee's claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, failure to provide itemised pay slips, and failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. The respondent had breached tribunal orders and did not attend the final hearing.

Compensation breakdown:

  • Unpaid wages: £1,701.20
  • Holiday pay: £560.00
  • Failure to provide itemised pay slips: £1,000.00
  • ACAS Code uplift (25%): £815.30
  • Failure to provide statement of particulars: £1,300.00
  • Preparation time order: £1,743.65
  • Expenses: £114.36
  • Total: £7,234.51

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employers must provide itemised pay slips and a written statement of employment particulars, even for short-term workers.
  • Failing to comply with tribunal orders can lead to a strike out of the defence and additional costs orders.
  • Workers with less than two years' service cannot claim unfair dismissal but can still bring claims for unpaid wages and other statutory rights.
  • The ACAS Code of Practice applies to grievance and disciplinary procedures; failure to follow it can result in a 25% uplift on awards.

A short-term worker's fight for unpaid wages

This case shows that even employees with very short service have important legal rights. The former employee worked for Rands Farm Equestrian Centre Ltd for just 15 weeks, but was left significantly out of pocket after the employer failed to pay the full wages owed and did not provide holiday pay or proper pay slips.

What the employer did wrong

The tribunal found that the claimant worked 487 hours at £10 per hour, but was only paid £3,168.80, leaving a shortfall of £1,701.20. In addition, the employer failed to pay holiday pay for the eight days accrued during the 104-day engagement. The respondent also did not provide itemised pay slips for the last 13 weeks of employment, nor a written statement of employment particulars. The employer's conduct throughout the proceedings was described as unreasonable, including failing to comply with tribunal orders and not attending the final hearing.

Why the result matters

This case is a reminder that statutory rights such as the right to a written statement of particulars and itemised pay slips apply from day one of employment. The tribunal also applied a 25% uplift under the ACAS Code of Practice because the employer had no formal grievance procedure and failed to engage with the claimant's complaints. The preparation time order and expenses awarded reflect the additional burden placed on the claimant by the employer's unreasonable behaviour. For workers in similar situations, the key takeaway is that persistence and proper documentation can lead to a successful claim, even against an uncooperative employer.

Similar cases