Claimant won £1,274 awarded Employment Tribunal · 27 December 2022

Swearing at director during resignation call not gross misconduct

A fitness club manager who swore at his boss during a heated phone call about his resignation was wrongfully dismissed. The tribunal awarded £1,273.52 in damages and repayment of unauthorised deductions.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed from July to October 2021 as a manager of two fitness clubs.
  • The claimant resigned by email on 8 October 2021, giving two weeks' notice.
  • During a phone call about his notice, the claimant swore at the respondent's director.
  • The respondent dismissed the claimant without notice, claiming gross misconduct.
  • The respondent deducted £600.45 from the claimant's final wages for allegedly unreturned property.
  • The tribunal found the claimant was not guilty of gross misconduct and the deductions were unauthorised.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    The claimant began working for the respondent as a manager of two fitness clubs on an annual salary of £35,000.

  2. Claimant resigned

    The claimant emailed the respondent's director, Amir Malik, stating his intention to resign and giving two weeks' notice until 22 October 2021.

  3. Phone call and dismissal

    During a phone call, the claimant swore at Mr Malik, who then told the claimant he was dismissed for gross misconduct and to leave immediately.

  4. Respondent itemised deductions

    Mr Malik sent a letter detailing the cost of property allegedly not returned by the claimant: fobs (£397.75), uniform (£73.37), and laptop (£129.33), totalling £600.45.

  5. Claimant provided laptop password

    The claimant emailed the password for the returned laptops to Mr Malik.

  6. Tribunal hearing

    The case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal via CVP before Employment Judge Krepski.

  7. Judgment issued

    The tribunal found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed and awarded damages of £673.07 for notice pay, and ordered repayment of the £600.45 unauthorised deductions.

The outcome

The tribunal found that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed. The employer had no contractual right to dismiss without notice for a single instance of swearing during a heated argument. The claimant was entitled to one week's notice pay of £673.07.

The tribunal also ordered the employer to repay the £600.45 deducted from the claimant's wages. The employer failed to prove that the claimant had not returned the property, and the deduction was therefore unauthorised.

Compensation breakdown:

  • Notice pay: £673.07
  • Repayment of unauthorised deductions: £600.45
  • Total: £1,273.52

Lessons & takeaways

  • A single swear word during an argument is unlikely to amount to gross misconduct, especially if the employee has already resigned.
  • Employers must have clear evidence of unreturned property before deducting wages, even if the contract allows deductions.
  • Short-service employees still have rights to notice pay and protection from unauthorised deductions.
  • Resignation does not give an employer free rein to dismiss without following proper procedure.

A resignation that turned sour

The claimant, a fitness club manager with only four months' service, resigned by email after a difficult relationship with his director. During a follow-up phone call about his notice period, the conversation became heated and the claimant swore at the director. The director immediately told him he was dismissed for gross misconduct and to leave the premises.

The tribunal found that while the language was inappropriate, it did not justify summary dismissal. The claimant had already resigned and was trying to negotiate his notice period. A single outburst in the heat of the moment did not destroy the employment relationship to the extent that the employer could dispense with notice.

What the employer got wrong

The employer made two critical errors. First, it treated the swearing as gross misconduct without considering the context — the claimant had already resigned and the argument was about his final week of work. Second, it deducted £600.45 from the claimant's final wages for property it claimed he had not returned, including fobs, uniform and a laptop. The tribunal found no evidence that the claimant had failed to return these items, and noted that he had even provided the laptop password after his dismissal.

What this means for similar claims

This case is a reminder that even employees with very short service are entitled to notice pay unless there is genuine gross misconduct. Employers cannot use a heated argument as a shortcut to avoid paying notice. It also shows that deductions from wages must be based on clear evidence, not assumptions. For employees, the case demonstrates that resigning does not waive your rights — if your employer dismisses you without notice for something that does not amount to gross misconduct, you may have a claim for wrongful dismissal.

Similar cases

Claim dismissed · Jun 2023

Unfair dismissal claim struck out due to less than two years' service

A former employee of Gatwick Construction Limited had their unfair dismissal claim thrown out because they had not worked there for two years. Their other claims for wrongful dismissal and unauthorised deductions also failed.

gross-misconductless-than-two-years-servicestrike-out
Respondent won · Apr 2023

Warehouse operative dismissed after stopping work over child maintenance deduction

A warehouse operative with five months' service who stopped attending work after a child maintenance deduction from his wages was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct. The tribunal rejected all claims of unauthorised deductions and wrongful dismissal.

unauthorised-deductionschild-maintenancepension-contributions
Respondent won · Mar 2023

Breakers Yard Manager with 17 years’ service dismissed for disobeying instructions: misconduct dismissal upheld

A Breakers Yard Manager who had worked for the company for 17 years without any prior warnings was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct after he ignored express instructions about a customer, sold tyres without authorisation and granted extended credit. The tribunal rejected all three claims.

gross-misconductdisobeying-instructionslong-service
Claimant won £564,672 · Dec 2023

Compliance Director dismissed days after blowing the whistle to the FCA: £564,672 award

A Compliance Director who reported money laundering and unauthorised directors to the FCA was dismissed four days later. The tribunal found the dismissal was automatically unfair and awarded over half a million pounds.

public-interest-disclosurefca-regulationmoney-laundering