Claimant won £4,695 awarded Employment Tribunal · 11 July 2023

Summary dismissal and minimum wage underpayment: 11-year employee wins unfair dismissal claim

A former employee with 11 years' service was unfairly dismissed and underpaid the national minimum wage. The tribunal awarded £4,694.53, including an ACAS uplift.

2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed by the respondent for 11 years.
  • She was summarily dismissed on 23 September 2022.
  • She started alternative employment on 28 September 2022.
  • The respondent underpaid her £0.32 per hour below the national minimum wage from 1 April 2022 to dismissal.
  • The respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements throughout employment.

Timeline

  1. Underpayment begins

    The respondent started underpaying the claimant £0.32 per hour below the national minimum wage.

  2. Summary dismissal

    The claimant was summarily dismissed by the respondent.

  3. New employment

    The claimant started alternative employment.

  4. Hearing

    The employment tribunal hearing took place at Manchester (by CVP).

  5. Judgment issued

    The tribunal issued its judgment, finding unfair dismissal and unauthorised deductions.

The outcome

The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and unauthorised deductions from wages.

  • The dismissal was procedurally unfair, and the respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice, leading to a 25% uplift on the compensatory award.
  • The respondent underpaid the claimant £0.32 per hour below the national minimum wage from 1 April 2022 until dismissal, totalling £288.
  • Compensation breakdown:
    • Basic award: £3,635.28
    • Compensatory award: £771.25 (including £117 for lost pay, £500 for loss of statutory rights, and £154.25 ACAS uplift)
    • Unauthorised deductions: £288.00
    • Total: £4,694.53

Lessons & takeaways

  • Even short gaps between dismissal and new employment can still result in a compensatory award for lost pay.
  • Employers who fail to follow the ACAS Code of Practice risk a 25% uplift on compensation.
  • Underpaying the national minimum wage is an unauthorised deduction that tribunals will order to be repaid.
  • Summary dismissal without proper procedure is likely to be unfair, especially for long-serving employees.

A swift dismissal and a wage underpayment

This case shows how a combination of procedural failings and a basic wage violation can leave an employer facing multiple claims. The claimant, who had worked for Catwalk Dogs St Helens Ltd for 11 years, was summarily dismissed on 23 September 2022. She found a new job just five days later, but the tribunal still found the dismissal unfair.

The employer's failure to follow a fair process was a key factor. The tribunal noted that the respondent did not adhere to the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures, which led to a 25% uplift on the compensatory award. For employees considering a claim, this highlights the importance of checking whether your employer followed proper procedures — if they didn't, you may be entitled to extra compensation.

What the employer could have done differently

Catwalk Dogs St Helens Ltd could have avoided the unfair dismissal finding by conducting a proper investigation and giving the claimant a chance to respond before deciding to dismiss. Even in cases of alleged misconduct, a fair process is essential, especially for employees with long service.

Additionally, the employer was found to have underpaid the claimant £0.32 per hour below the national minimum wage for nearly six months. This was an unauthorised deduction from wages, and the tribunal ordered repayment of £288. Employers must ensure they pay at least the legal minimum wage — failing to do so is a clear breach of employment law.

Why this matters for similar claims

This case is a reminder that even if you find a new job quickly after dismissal, you can still claim for lost earnings during the gap. The claimant received £117 for two days' lost pay. The tribunal also awarded £500 for loss of statutory rights — a standard sum for employees who lose the right to bring an unfair dismissal claim due to the two-year qualifying period (though this claimant had more than enough service).

For employees, the key takeaway is to keep records of your pay and any communications about dismissal. For employers, the message is clear: follow the ACAS Code, pay the minimum wage, and provide itemised pay statements. Failure to do so can result in multiple claims and increased compensation.

Similar cases

Partial win £3,436 · Jan 2023

Barber dismissed via WhatsApp for sick absence: unfair dismissal and wage deductions

A barber with three years' service was unfairly dismissed via WhatsApp after calling in sick. The tribunal also found the employer made unauthorised deductions from wages and failed to provide a written contract, awarding £3,435.59.

unfair-dismissalunauthorised-deductionsnational-minimum-wage
Partial win £3,753 · Mar 2024

Dismissed without a meeting or appeal: a conduct case with big reductions

A former employee of Fairview Grocers Limited was unfairly dismissed without any meeting or right of appeal, but his own conduct led to a 60% cut in compensation. He was awarded £3,752.89 in total.

unfair-dismissaldisability-discriminationunauthorised-deductions
Claimant won £14,629 · Dec 2023

Dismissed by text message after raising concerns about undercooked chicken

A part-time takeaway worker was unfairly dismissed by text message after complaining about undercooked chicken. The tribunal awarded £14,628.50 in compensation.

dismissal-by-text-messageabusive-messagesacas-code-uplift
Claimant won £56,202 · Dec 2023

Gymnastics coach dismissed after asking for contract and payslips wins automatic unfair dismissal claim

A gymnastics coach was automatically unfairly dismissed after asserting her right to a written contract and payslips. The tribunal awarded £56,202 including compensation for unlawful wage deductions.

gymnastics-coachautomatic-unfair-dismissalunauthorised-deductions