Redundancy after maternity leave: fair dismissal despite flexible working request
A senior administrator who was made redundant shortly after returning from maternity leave has lost her unfair dismissal and discrimination claims. The tribunal found the redundancy process was fair and not linked to her pregnancy or flexible working request.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimant was employed from 12 December 2015 until 31 August 2020.
- She commenced maternity leave on 4 May 2019 and was promoted to Senior MICE Administrator in April 2019.
- She requested part-time work from home after maternity leave, and a new role of MICE Monitoring Analyst was created for her.
- The respondent faced a redundancy situation due to the COVID-19 lockdown and reduced headcount by 46.
- The claimant was placed in a pool of Senior MICE Consultants and selected for redundancy based on five criteria.
- The tribunal found the dismissal was fair and no discrimination occurred.
Timeline
-
Employment commenced
Claimant started working for Click Travel Limited.
-
Promotion to Senior MICE Administrator
Claimant was promoted to the role of Senior MICE Administrator, the only such role in the company.
-
Maternity leave started
Claimant commenced maternity leave.
-
Email requesting part-time work
Claimant emailed her line manager expressing a wish to work part-time from home after maternity leave.
-
Meeting with line manager
Claimant met with Ms Norrie; was told her substantive role could not be done part-time, but a new role of MICE Monitoring Analyst was proposed.
-
Flexible working request approved
Respondent approved the flexible working request, creating the new role with two-day working week.
-
Lockdown imposed
UK lockdown due to COVID-19 severely impacted the respondent's business.
-
Return from maternity leave and furlough
Claimant returned from maternity leave and was immediately placed on furlough, paid 100% of her contractual salary.
-
Redundancy consultation began
Respondent started collective and individual consultation due to need to reduce headcount by 46.
-
Dismissal
Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy after being selected in the pool.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employee was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy, and whether her dismissal was discriminatory due to her pregnancy/maternity or sex. It also considered a claim for unpaid wages during furlough.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all claims. It held that the redundancy situation was genuine, the pool of Senior MICE Consultants was appropriate, and the selection criteria were objective and fairly applied. The flexible working request had been approved and a new role created, but that role was later included in the redundancy pool when the business needed to cut 46 roles. The tribunal found no evidence that the claimant's maternity leave or flexible working request influenced the decision to make her redundant. The claim for unpaid wages was also rejected because the claimant was paid 100% of her contractual salary during furlough.
Lessons & takeaways
- A genuine redundancy situation can justify dismissal even shortly after an employee returns from maternity leave, provided the process is fair.
- Employers should carefully consider pooling and selection criteria to ensure they are objective and not indirectly discriminatory.
- Flexible working requests approved before a redundancy situation do not guarantee protection from future redundancy if the role is affected.
- Employees on furlough should check their contractual terms; being paid full contractual salary may prevent a claim for unpaid wages.
- It is important for employees to raise concerns about discrimination or unfairness during the consultation process, as failure to do so can weaken a later claim.
A redundancy that survived scrutiny
This case shows that a redundancy dismissal can be fair even when it happens shortly after an employee returns from maternity leave. The claimant had been promoted to Senior MICE Administrator, the only such role in the company. While on maternity leave, she requested part-time work from home, and her employer created a new role of MICE Monitoring Analyst for her. But when the COVID-19 lockdown hit, the company needed to cut 46 roles. The new role was placed in a pool with Senior MICE Consultants, and the claimant was selected for redundancy.
The tribunal accepted that the redundancy situation was genuine and that the employer acted reasonably. The selection criteria were based on skills, performance, and attendance, and the claimant scored lower than others in the pool. The tribunal found no evidence that her maternity leave or flexible working request played any part in the decision.
What the employer did right
The employer consulted collectively and individually, considered alternative roles, and applied objective criteria. The tribunal noted that the claimant was paid 100% of her salary during furlough, which was more than the statutory requirement. The employer also kept records and communicated clearly throughout the process.
What this means for similar claims
Employees returning from maternity leave are protected from discrimination, but that protection does not make them immune to genuine redundancy. Employers who follow a fair process, use objective criteria, and can show the redundancy is genuine are likely to succeed in defending claims. For employees, it is important to engage with the consultation process and raise any concerns about discrimination or unfairness at the time, as this can strengthen a later claim.
Similar cases
Finance Manager loses redundancy and discrimination claims after returning from maternity leave
An Employment Tribunal has dismissed all claims of maternity discrimination, harassment, victimisation and unfair dismissal brought by a Finance Manager who was made redundant shortly after returning from maternity leave.
Redundancy during maternity leave: unfair dismissal but no compensation
An English & Maths Community Coordinator with 9 years' service was unfairly dismissed by Birmingham Metropolitan College during maternity leave, but the tribunal awarded no compensation due to a 100% Polkey reduction.
Fabrication welder loses unfair dismissal claim over redundancy selection while on furlough
A fabrication welder with 8 years' service was fairly dismissed for redundancy after being scored lowest in his pool, despite having undisclosed disabilities and being on furlough. The tribunal upheld the employer's process.
Redundancy with no consultation: a small employer's costly mistake
A graphic designer was told her role was redundant in a five-minute meeting with no warning, no consultation and no consideration of alternatives. The tribunal awarded £14,200.
