Accepting re-engagement after dismissal can block a constructive dismissal claim
A nurse who accepted re-engagement after being dismissed for gross misconduct could not later claim constructive unfair dismissal when she resigned. The tribunal struck out her claims.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #constructive-dismissal
- #re-engagement
- #strike-out
- #no-reasonable-prospect
- #overtaken-point
Key facts
- The claimant was initially dismissed on 18 February 2022 for gross misconduct.
- The claimant appealed and was offered re-engagement on 19 May 2022, which she accepted.
- The claimant resigned on 30 May 2022, claiming constructive unfair dismissal.
- The claimant had accepted a new contract preserving continuity of service but with reduced pay.
- The tribunal found that the acceptance of re-engagement overtook any earlier breach of contract.
Timeline
-
Initial dismissal
The claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct.
-
Offer and acceptance of re-engagement
The respondent offered re-engagement as a Transcare Nurse with reduced pay but preserved continuity. The claimant accepted by email and signed the contract.
-
Claimant resigned
The claimant resigned, claiming constructive unfair dismissal based on earlier breaches.
-
Preliminary hearing and strike out
The tribunal struck out the claims as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether a former employee who accepted re-engagement after being dismissed could still pursue a claim for constructive unfair dismissal based on the original dismissal and alleged breaches.
The outcome
The tribunal struck out all claims, including unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages, on the grounds that they had no reasonable prospect of success.
The key reason was that the claimant accepted re-engagement on 19 May 2022, after her initial dismissal on 18 February 2022. By accepting a new contract with preserved continuity of service, she effectively waived any earlier breaches of contract. Her subsequent resignation on 30 May 2022 could not revive those breaches.
No compensation was awarded as the claims were struck out.
Lessons & takeaways
- Accepting re-engagement after dismissal can waive your right to claim constructive dismissal based on earlier breaches.
- If you resign claiming constructive dismissal, you must do so promptly after the alleged breach — delay or acceptance of a new contract can undermine your case.
- A claim with no reasonable prospect of success may be struck out at a preliminary hearing, saving time and costs.
What this case shows
This case illustrates a common trap for employees who are dismissed and then offered re-engagement. The former employee, a Transcare Nurse, was initially dismissed for gross misconduct in February 2022. She appealed, and in May 2022 the employer offered her a new role as a Transcare Nurse with reduced pay but preserved continuity of service. She accepted the offer in writing.
However, just 11 days later she resigned, claiming constructive unfair dismissal based on the original dismissal and alleged breaches of contract. The tribunal found that by accepting re-engagement, she had effectively accepted the new contract and could not go back to complain about the earlier dismissal.
What the employer did right
B. Braun Medical Ltd acted carefully by offering re-engagement on clear terms, preserving continuity, and obtaining written acceptance. This closed the door on the earlier dismissal and meant any later resignation could not be linked to the original breach.
Why this matters
For employees, the lesson is clear: if you accept re-engagement after a dismissal, you may lose the right to claim constructive dismissal based on the original events. The tribunal will see the acceptance as a fresh start. If you believe the re-engagement itself is a breach (e.g., due to reduced pay), you should raise that promptly and not rely on earlier grievances.
For employers, this case shows the value of offering re-engagement with a clear written contract and getting express acceptance. It can effectively neutralise a subsequent constructive dismissal claim.
Similar cases
Constructive dismissal claim struck out: senior employee's case had no reasonable prospect
A senior local government employee's constructive dismissal claim against Liverpool City Council was struck out after he admitted the employer's conduct was not calculated to destroy trust and confidence.
Constructive dismissal claim struck out: short service and no notice pay loss
A personal assistant who resigned and worked her full notice period had her constructive wrongful dismissal claim struck out for having no reasonable prospect of success.
Sanctions law prevented maternity pay: dismissal claim struck out
A housekeeping assistant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out because UK sanctions on the company's owner made it illegal to pay her. The tribunal said the claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
Retire-and-return scheme leads to constructive dismissal claim, but breach of contract and age discrimination claims struck out
A consultant clinical scientist with 23 years' service resigned after a 'retire and return' scheme reduced her role. The tribunal struck out her breach of contract and age discrimination claims, but allowed her unfair dismissal claim to proceed.
