Postal worker's unfair dismissal claim struck out after missing deadline due to union advice
A postal worker who relied on his trade union's incorrect advice about the time limit for bringing an unfair dismissal claim had his case struck out as out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for him to have presented the claim within the three-month window.
2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #gross-misconduct
- #time-limit
- #trade-union-advice
- #acas-early-conciliation
- #daughter-illness
Key facts
- The claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct effective 7 October 2022.
- The claimant's trade union representatives did not advise him of the correct time limit for bringing an unfair dismissal claim.
- The claimant only learned of the three-month time limit on 12 January 2023 from his wife's friend.
- The claimant's appeal was delayed by Royal Mail due to industrial action and was not heard until February 2023.
- The claimant's daughter was seriously ill and hospitalized in December 2022.
Timeline
-
Dismissal
The claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct effective 7 October 2022.
-
Dismissal hearing
The claimant's dismissal hearing took place, with trade union representative Mr W attending.
-
Daughter's hospitalization
The claimant's young daughter became seriously unwell and was admitted to hospital, released on 23 December 2022.
-
Time limit expiry
The ordinary limitation period for presenting an unfair dismissal claim expired (3 months less one day from 7 October 2022).
-
Discovery of time limit
The claimant's wife met a friend who informed her of the three-month time limit; the claimant contacted ACAS the same day.
-
Early conciliation start
The claimant entered early conciliation with ACAS.
-
Early conciliation end
Early conciliation ended.
-
Claim presented
The claimant presented his claim to the Employment Tribunal.
-
Appeal hearing
The claimant's internal appeal was heard, several months after dismissal.
-
Hearing
The Tribunal heard the claimant's case on the time limit issue.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was presented within the statutory time limit (three months from dismissal), and if not, whether it was not reasonably practicable for him to present it in time, and if so, whether he presented it within a reasonable further period.
The outcome
The tribunal decided that the claim was presented outside the time limit and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented it in time. The claim was therefore struck out for lack of jurisdiction.
The key reasons were:
- The claimant was dismissed on 7 October 2022, meaning the deadline was 6 January 2023. He entered early conciliation on 12 January 2023 and presented his claim on 19 January 2023.
- The claimant relied on incorrect advice from his trade union representatives that the time limit ran from the outcome of his appeal, not the dismissal.
- However, the tribunal found that the claimant could have discovered the correct time limit by contacting ACAS or seeking independent advice, especially given his daughter's illness had resolved by early January.
- The claimant did not present his claim until after the deadline, and the delay was not justified by the circumstances.
No compensation was awarded as the claim was struck out.
Lessons & takeaways
- The statutory time limit for unfair dismissal claims is three months from the effective date of termination, not from the outcome of any internal appeal.
- Relying solely on trade union advice about time limits is risky; always verify the deadline independently, for example by checking ACAS or government guidance.
- Personal circumstances such as family illness may not excuse a delay if the claimant could still have taken steps to present the claim within time.
- If you miss the deadline, you must show it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time – ignorance of the law is not usually a valid excuse.
- Contact ACAS early conciliation as soon as possible after dismissal to preserve your right to claim, even if an appeal is ongoing.
A costly misunderstanding of time limits
This case illustrates how a misunderstanding about the time limit for bringing an unfair dismissal claim can have fatal consequences, even when the employee was relying on professional advice. The postal worker was dismissed by Royal Mail for gross misconduct in October 2022. He believed, based on what his trade union representatives told him, that he had three months from the conclusion of his internal appeal to bring a claim. In fact, the statutory deadline is three months from the effective date of termination – the date of dismissal itself.
By the time the claimant discovered the correct position – through a chance conversation between his wife and a friend in mid-January 2023 – the deadline had already passed. He immediately contacted ACAS and presented his claim, but it was too late. The tribunal had to decide whether it was not reasonably practicable for him to have presented the claim in time, which would have allowed a late claim to proceed.
What the tribunal decided
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had been given incorrect advice by his union representatives and that he was a credible witness. However, the legal test is not simply whether the employee was misled. The key question is whether it was reasonably practicable for the employee to have discovered the correct time limit and presented the claim on time. The tribunal found that the claimant could have taken steps to verify the deadline – for example, by contacting ACAS or a solicitor – especially once his daughter's serious illness had resolved in early January. The fact that he did not do so meant that the delay was not excusable.
What this means for similar claims
This case is a reminder that the time limit for unfair dismissal is strict and that ignorance or reliance on incorrect advice will not automatically extend it. Employees who are dismissed should check the deadline themselves as soon as possible, and not assume that their union or employer will get it right. If you are in any doubt, contact ACAS early conciliation immediately – it is free and can be done before an internal appeal is concluded. The cost of missing the deadline is that your claim may be struck out entirely, regardless of its merits.
Similar cases
Online delivery driver's unfair dismissal claim thrown out for being too late
A Sainsbury's delivery driver who claimed he was unfairly dismissed for discount card misuse had his case dismissed because he presented his claim two months after the deadline.
33-year consultant haematologist's unfair dismissal claim struck out as out of time
A consultant haematologist with 33 years' service lost his unfair dismissal claim after the tribunal ruled he filed it 89 days late. The claim was struck out because it was reasonably practicable for him to have submitted it on time.
Security guard dismissed for leaving post early: claim thrown out for being 11 days late
A security guard who was dismissed for gross misconduct after leaving his site early had his unfair dismissal claim rejected because he presented it 11 days after the three-month time limit. The tribunal said ignorance of the deadline was not a reasonable excuse.
17-year Tesco shift leader's unfair dismissal claim struck out for failing to comply with tribunal directions
A shift leader with 17 years' service had his unfair dismissal claim struck out after he failed to provide a witness statement, disclosure, or a schedule of loss, and did not engage with the respondent or the tribunal.
