Claim dismissed Employment Tribunal · 21 April 2023

33-year consultant haematologist's unfair dismissal claim struck out as out of time

A consultant haematologist with 33 years' service lost his unfair dismissal claim after the tribunal ruled he filed it 89 days late. The claim was struck out because it was reasonably practicable for him to have submitted it on time.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was dismissed for gross misconduct on 28 April 2022.
  • The effective date of termination was 28 April 2022.
  • The claimant's internal appeal was heard on 5 September 2022 and dismissed on 20 September 2022.
  • The claimant started ACAS Early Conciliation on 24 October 2022, which ended on 26 October 2022.
  • The claim was presented to the tribunal on 1 November 2022, 89 days after the time limit expired.
  • The claimant was a highly intelligent consultant haematologist with access to the internet and legal advice.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    The claimant began working for the respondent as a consultant haematologist.

  2. Dismissal communicated

    The claimant was handed a letter dismissing him for gross misconduct, effective immediately.

  3. Appeal submitted

    The claimant's barrister submitted a full appeal against the dismissal.

  4. Appeal hearing

    The internal appeal hearing took place, with deliberations on 7 September 2022.

  5. Appeal outcome

    The appeal failed and the original dismissal decision was upheld.

  6. Further appeal to Chair

    The claimant sent a further appeal to Dr McMahon, Chair of the hospital, which was rejected on 1 October 2022.

  7. Contacted CQC

    The claimant contacted the Care Quality Commission, which replied on 18 October 2022 suggesting ACAS.

  8. ACAS Early Conciliation started

    The claimant started ACAS Early Conciliation, which ended on 26 October 2022.

  9. Claim presented to tribunal

    The claimant submitted his claim form to the Employment Tribunal.

  10. Preliminary hearing

    The tribunal heard the respondent's application to strike out the claim as out of time.

The outcome

The tribunal struck out the claimant's unfair dismissal claim as out of time.

  • The effective date of termination was 28 April 2022, making the deadline 27 July 2022.
  • The claimant did not start ACAS Early Conciliation until 24 October 2022, and presented his claim on 1 November 2022 — 89 days late.
  • The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented his claim in time, given his intelligence, access to legal advice, and the fact that he had already instructed a barrister for his internal appeal.
  • No compensation was awarded as the claim was struck out.

Lessons & takeaways

  • The three-month time limit for unfair dismissal claims starts from the effective date of termination, not the end of any internal appeal.
  • Waiting for an internal appeal outcome does not extend the time limit — you must present your claim within three months of dismissal.
  • If you have access to legal advice or are capable of understanding the process, the tribunal will expect you to act promptly.
  • Contacting other bodies like the CQC does not stop the clock — only ACAS Early Conciliation can extend the time limit.
  • Even a long-serving employee can lose their right to claim if they miss the deadline.

A costly delay

A consultant haematologist who had worked for Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust for 33 years was dismissed for gross misconduct in April 2022. He pursued an internal appeal, which was heard in September and rejected. But by the time he lodged his unfair dismissal claim with the employment tribunal in November 2022, the three-month time limit had already expired by 89 days.

The tribunal had to decide whether it was reasonably practicable for him to have filed on time. The claimant argued that he was waiting for the outcome of his internal appeal and had also contacted the Care Quality Commission before starting ACAS Early Conciliation. However, the judge noted that the claimant was a highly intelligent consultant with access to the internet and legal advice — he had even instructed a barrister for his appeal. The tribunal concluded that he could have presented his claim within the original time limit, and therefore had no jurisdiction to hear it.

What could have been done differently?

The key lesson is that the three-month time limit for unfair dismissal runs from the effective date of termination, not from the end of any internal appeal. Even if an appeal is pending, employees should present their claim to the tribunal within the deadline to protect their position. The tribunal can stay proceedings while the appeal is ongoing, but missing the deadline can be fatal.

Why this matters

This case is a stark reminder that even the most experienced and well-advised employees can lose their right to claim unfair dismissal if they delay. The tribunal will not extend the time limit simply because the employee was waiting for an internal process to conclude. Anyone considering an unfair dismissal claim should seek legal advice immediately and, if in doubt, present their claim as soon as possible to avoid being struck out.

Similar cases

Claim dismissed · Jul 2023

Unfair dismissal claim struck out: waiting for internal appeal and personal tragedy didn't extend time limit

A 12-year employee who waited until after his internal appeal to bring an unfair dismissal claim was out of time. The tribunal rejected arguments that his wife's stillbirth and his own ignorance of procedure made it not reasonably practicable to claim earlier.

gross-misconducttime-limitreasonably-practicable
Claim dismissed · Jul 2023

Online delivery driver's unfair dismissal claim thrown out for being too late

A Sainsbury's delivery driver who claimed he was unfairly dismissed for discount card misuse had his case dismissed because he presented his claim two months after the deadline.

gross-misconductdiscount-card-misusetime-limit
Claim dismissed · May 2023

Postal worker's unfair dismissal claim struck out after missing deadline due to union advice

A postal worker who relied on his trade union's incorrect advice about the time limit for bringing an unfair dismissal claim had his case struck out as out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for him to have presented the claim within the three-month window.

gross-misconducttime-limittrade-union-advice
Claim dismissed · Jul 2022

Security guard dismissed for leaving post early: claim thrown out for being 11 days late

A security guard who was dismissed for gross misconduct after leaving his site early had his unfair dismissal claim rejected because he presented it 11 days after the three-month time limit. The tribunal said ignorance of the deadline was not a reasonable excuse.

gross-misconducttime-limitignorance-of-rights