Former driver's unfair dismissal claim struck out after missing deadline and hearing
A former passenger vehicle driver lost his unfair dismissal, race discrimination, and unlawful deduction claims after the tribunal found they were brought too late and he failed to attend the preliminary hearing.
2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a Flexible Employee from 5 June 2019.
- The claimant's assignment with Hillingdon Council ended in March 2022.
- The respondent alleged the claimant failed to maintain contact after the assignment ended.
- The claimant's employment was terminated on 29 April 2022.
- The claimant presented his claim on 25 August 2022, after the time limit.
- The claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing.
Timeline
-
Employment started
The claimant began employment with the respondent as a Flexible Employee and commenced an assignment with Hillingdon Council as a Spare Passenger Vehicle Driver.
-
Assignment ended
The assignment with Hillingdon Council terminated in the week ending 18 March 2022.
-
Employment terminated
The respondent terminated the claimant's employment due to failure to maintain contact.
-
Time limit deadline
The deadline for the claimant to commence ACAS early conciliation (three months less one day from termination) passed.
-
ACAS early conciliation started
The claimant began ACAS early conciliation.
-
Claim presented
The claimant presented his claim form to the tribunal, alleging unfair dismissal, race discrimination, and arrears of pay.
-
Preliminary hearing listed
The tribunal listed the case for an Open Preliminary Hearing to decide jurisdiction on time limits.
-
Preliminary hearing
The claimant did not attend. The tribunal struck out the claim as out of time.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether it had jurisdiction to hear the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, and unlawful deduction from wages, given that they appeared to have been brought outside the statutory time limits.
The outcome
The tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety.
- The claimant's employment ended on 29 April 2022, meaning the deadline for ACAS early conciliation was 28 July 2022. He did not start conciliation until 17 August 2022 and presented his claim on 25 August 2022.
- The claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing, despite being notified. The tribunal found no reasonable explanation for the delay and no grounds to extend time.
- No compensation was awarded as the claims were dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employment tribunal claims must be started within strict time limits – usually three months less one day from the dismissal or discriminatory act.
- If you miss the deadline, you must attend the hearing to explain why it would be just and equitable to extend time – failing to attend can be fatal.
- Keep the tribunal and the respondent updated with your correct contact details, and check for messages about hearing dates.
- Even if you have a potential claim, the tribunal cannot hear it if you do not follow the procedural rules on time limits and attendance.
A missed deadline and a missed hearing
This case shows how procedural rules can derail a claim before the merits are even considered. The former employee, a Spare Passenger Vehicle Driver on an assignment with Hillingdon Council, was dismissed by his employer, Pertemps Recruitment Partnership Limited, on 29 April 2022 after he allegedly failed to keep in contact following the end of his assignment. He brought claims for unfair dismissal, race discrimination, and unlawful deduction from wages, but the tribunal never got to examine the substance of those allegations.
The problem was timing. Employment tribunal claims must be started within strict time limits – usually three months less one day from the date of dismissal or the discriminatory act. For the driver, the deadline to begin ACAS early conciliation was 28 July 2022. He did not start conciliation until 17 August, and presented his claim on 25 August. That was nearly a month late. In his claim form, he acknowledged that he had spoken to a solicitor but accepted he had not contacted her in time.
The consequences of non-attendance
The tribunal listed an Open Preliminary Hearing to decide whether it could hear the out-of-time claims. The driver did not attend. The tribunal clerk called him twice and left voicemails, but he did not respond. The respondent's representative confirmed that she had copied the driver on emails about the hearing, using the email address he had provided. The tribunal had also sent him correspondence. There was no indication that he had not received the notifications.
Without the claimant present to explain why the delay should be excused, the tribunal had no choice but to strike out the claims. Employment Judge Wyeth noted that the claims were clearly out of time on the face of the claim form, and the claimant had not provided any reason why it would be just and equitable to extend the deadline. The race discrimination claim was also dismissed because, even if it had been in time, the claimant had not specified his race or explained how race was linked to his dismissal.
What this means for similar claims
This case is a reminder that employment tribunals are strict about time limits and attendance. Even a potentially strong claim can be lost if the paperwork is not filed promptly and the claimant does not engage with the process. Anyone considering a tribunal claim should seek advice early, note the deadline from the date of dismissal or the last discriminatory act, and ensure they attend all hearings. Missing a deadline is not always fatal if there is a good reason, but the tribunal needs to hear that reason from the claimant in person.
Similar cases
Former employee's constructive dismissal claim thrown out for being too late
A tribunal has dismissed a former employee's claims of constructive unfair dismissal, unpaid wages and race discrimination against Whitbread Group Plc because they were brought too late.
Former employee's claims dismissed as out of time
A former employee of West London NHS Trust had his claims of unfair dismissal, unlawful deduction from wages, and race discrimination dismissed because he filed them too late.
Former employee loses unfair dismissal and discrimination claims after failing to pursue them
A former employee's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed for lack of continuity of employment, and his race discrimination claim was thrown out as out of time. Other claims were struck out for failing to actively pursue them.
Taxi driver's unfair dismissal and discrimination claims dismissed as out of time
A taxi driver who waited over six months to bring his claim after Uber deactivated his account has had his case thrown out by the Nottingham tribunal for being well outside the three-month time limit.
