Partial win £26,022 awarded Employment Tribunal · 4 August 2023

Locked out without notice: 18-year employee wins redundancy and unpaid wages

A former employee with 18 years' service was locked out of her workplace and left unpaid for months. The tribunal awarded her over £26,000 in redundancy, breach of contract, unpaid salary, and holiday pay.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was locked out of her workplace on 8 March 2023, ending her employment.
  • She had 18 years of continuous service and was aged 40 at termination.
  • The respondent did not attend the hearing and is subject to striking out proceedings.
  • The claimant was last paid salary for October 2021 and remained unpaid for 10 months.
  • She had previously obtained a judgment for unpaid salary up to May 2022, which remained unpaid.

Timeline

  1. Last salary payment

    The claimant was last paid salary for the month ending 31 October 2021.

  2. Previous judgment for unpaid salary

    The claimant obtained a judgment for unpaid salary from October 2021 to May 2022, totaling £12,936.84 gross, which remained unpaid.

  3. Employment terminated by lockout

    The claimant was locked out of her place of employment, signifying termination of employment.

  4. Tribunal hearing and judgment

    The Employment Tribunal heard the case and issued a judgment awarding redundancy payment, breach of contract damages, unpaid salary, and holiday pay.

The outcome

The tribunal ruled in favour of the employee on most claims, awarding a total of £26,021.89.

  • Redundancy payment: £6,265.44 (based on 18 years' service, age 40, and a weekly gross pay of £348.08)
  • Breach of contract (notice pay): £4,176.96 (12 weeks' pay)
  • Unpaid salary: £15,083.30 (10 months at £1,508.33 per month)
  • Holiday pay: £496.19 (6.25 days at £79.39 per day)

The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as it related to a date after the claim was presented.

Lessons & takeaways

  • If you are locked out of your workplace without notice, you may have a claim for unfair dismissal, redundancy, and breach of contract.
  • Keep records of unpaid wages and any previous judgments, as they can support your case for ongoing arrears.
  • The tribunal can award a redundancy payment even if the employer does not attend the hearing, provided you have the required length of service.
  • Failure to pay wages for several months is a serious breach that can lead to additional claims for unlawful deduction from wages.

A long career ended abruptly

After 18 years of continuous service, the employee was locked out of her workplace on 8 March 2023, with no prior notice or explanation. She had not been paid since October 2021 – a period of 10 months – and had already obtained a county court judgment for earlier unpaid wages that remained unsatisfied. The employer, Riviera Multimedia Ltd, did not attend the tribunal hearing and was facing strike-out proceedings.

What the tribunal decided

The tribunal accepted the employee's evidence in full. It held that being locked out amounted to a dismissal, entitling her to a redundancy payment of £6,265.44. Because she was given no notice, she was also awarded 12 weeks' pay in lieu of notice (£4,176.96) for breach of contract. In addition, the tribunal ordered payment of £15,083.30 for 10 months of unpaid salary and £496.19 for 6.25 days of accrued but untaken holiday. The total award came to £26,021.89.

Why this matters

This case shows that even when an employer is absent and appears to be in financial difficulty, employees can still obtain a judgment for unpaid wages and statutory entitlements. The tribunal will rely on the employee's credible evidence if the employer does not contest the claim. It also highlights that a lockout can be treated as a dismissal, triggering redundancy rights for employees with at least two years' service.

What the employer could have done differently

The employer could have avoided this outcome by engaging with the process – attending the hearing, providing evidence, or at least responding to the claim. Paying the employee's wages and following proper redundancy procedures would have prevented the claim entirely. Instead, the company's failure to act left it liable for a substantial award.

Similar cases