Waiting for an internal appeal: when the tribunal clock runs out
A police contact officer who waited for his internal appeal to finish before bringing an unfair dismissal claim was out of time. The tribunal dismissed the claim, but allowed his discrimination complaints to proceed.
2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimant was dismissed on 9 August 2021.
- He was aware from dismissal that he could contact ACAS or an Employment Tribunal.
- He decided to wait for the outcome of his internal appeal before taking any action.
- He first learned of the three-month time limit on 1 March 2022, the day his appeal was rejected.
- He notified ACAS on 1 March 2022 and submitted his claim on 13 March 2022.
- The unfair dismissal claim was presented out of time and dismissed.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began working as a Contact Officer for the Respondent.
-
Dismissal
Claimant was dismissed with pay in lieu of notice. He considered it unfair and mentioned appealing to his line manager.
-
Line manager comment
Line manager suggested he appeal first to avoid negative perception.
-
New employment started
Claimant started work as a Customer Services Advisor.
-
Appeal rejected
Internal appeal hearing took place and was not upheld. Claimant first learned of the three-month time limit.
-
ACAS notified
Claimant contacted ACAS and notified them of a claim.
-
ACAS certificate issued
Early conciliation certificate was issued.
-
Claim presented
Claimant submitted his claim form to the Employment Tribunal.
-
Preliminary hearing
Preliminary hearing before EJ Youngs; respondent's response accepted and final hearing listed.
-
Time limit hearing
Preliminary hearing before EJ Danvers to decide time limit issues.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was presented within the three-month time limit, and if not, whether it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. It also considered whether the discrimination claims should be allowed to proceed out of time on just and equitable grounds.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim as out of time, but allowed the disability discrimination claims to proceed.
- The claimant was dismissed on 9 August 2021 and knew from that date that he could contact ACAS or an Employment Tribunal.
- He decided to wait for the outcome of his internal appeal, which was rejected on 1 March 2022 – the same day he first learned of the three-month time limit.
- He notified ACAS on 1 March 2022 and submitted his claim on 13 March 2022, over seven months after dismissal.
- The tribunal held that it was reasonably practicable to have presented the unfair dismissal claim in time, even while the appeal was pending.
- However, the discrimination claims were allowed to proceed because it was just and equitable to extend time, given the claimant's lack of knowledge of the time limit and the respondent's conduct.
Lessons & takeaways
- Do not assume that waiting for an internal appeal outcome will pause the three-month tribunal time limit – it does not.
- If you think you have been unfairly dismissed, contact ACAS or an Employment Tribunal as soon as possible, even if an internal appeal is ongoing.
- The time limit for unfair dismissal is strict: three months from the effective date of termination, subject only to a narrow 'not reasonably practicable' extension.
- Discrimination claims have a different, more flexible time limit – the tribunal can extend time if it is 'just and equitable' to do so.
- Seek advice early: a union or legal representative could have flagged the time limit issue and avoided the claim being dismissed.
A costly wait for an internal appeal
This case shows how easily a well-intentioned decision to exhaust internal processes can derail an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant, a Contact Officer with six years' service, was dismissed on 9 August 2021. He believed his dismissal was unfair and told his line manager he intended to appeal. The manager suggested he appeal first to avoid a negative perception. So he did – and waited.
He did not contact ACAS or the Employment Tribunal until 1 March 2022, the day his appeal was rejected. That was the first time he learned of the three-month time limit. By then, over seven months had passed since his dismissal. His unfair dismissal claim was presented on 13 March 2022, well outside the statutory period.
What the tribunal decided
The tribunal had to apply the strict test under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996: was it 'not reasonably practicable' for the claim to be presented within three months? The claimant argued that he did not know about the time limit and was waiting for the appeal outcome. But the tribunal noted that he had been told at dismissal that he could contact ACAS or a tribunal. He was also a union member and could have sought advice. The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable to have presented the claim in time, even while the appeal was pending. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed.
However, the discrimination claims – for disability discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and harassment – were allowed to proceed. The Equality Act 2010 gives tribunals a wider discretion to extend time where it is 'just and equitable'. The tribunal considered the claimant's lack of knowledge, the respondent's conduct, and the fact that the claims were closely linked to the dismissal. It decided that the balance of prejudice favoured allowing the discrimination claims to go forward.
What this means for similar claims
This case is a stark reminder that the time limit for unfair dismissal is unforgiving. Waiting for an internal appeal does not stop the clock. Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should seek advice immediately and, at the very least, lodge a protective claim to preserve their rights. Discrimination claims, by contrast, offer more flexibility – but even they should be brought as soon as possible. The safest approach is to act promptly on all potential claims, rather than relying on internal processes to resolve the matter first.
Similar cases
Former employee's unfair dismissal claim struck out as five months late
A tribunal struck out a former employee's claims because they were presented five months late, and refused to extend time even after the employee submitted additional medical evidence.
Former ambulance service employee's claim struck out as out of time
A former ambulance service employee had her unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims struck out after lodging them over three weeks late. She was ordered to pay £4,305.48 in costs.
Ignorance of time limits not enough for unfair dismissal but disability claim allowed
A former employee who missed the deadline for his unfair dismissal claim because he didn't know about the three-month limit was able to proceed with his disability discrimination claim on 'just and equitable' grounds.
Unfair dismissal claim dismissed despite severe mental health: the 'reasonable period' trap
A bank employee's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as out of time, even though the tribunal accepted her severe mental health made it not reasonably practicable to claim within the first three months.
