Whistleblower dispenser denied interim relief after patient safety concerns
A part-time dispenser who raised patient safety concerns about medication mix-ups and sabotage was summarily dismissed. The tribunal refused interim relief, finding she did not have a 'pretty good chance' of proving her dismissal was due to whistleblowing.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #interim-relief
- #protected-disclosure
- #patient-safety
- #sabotage-allegation
- #pretty-good-chance-test
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a dispenser at a GP surgery.
- She sent emails on 15 and 16 February 2023 alleging medication mix-ups and sabotage, raising patient safety concerns.
- She also reported her concerns to the Care Quality Commission on 16 February 2023.
- She was summarily dismissed on 9 March 2023.
- The respondent claimed the dismissal was due to an irrevocable breakdown in relationships and the claimant's behaviour.
- The tribunal refused interim relief, finding the claimant did not have a 'pretty good chance' of success.
Timeline
-
First email to employer
Claimant emailed practice manager and GP partner about incorrect medication being provided to a patient, alleging sabotage and patient safety concerns.
-
Second email to employer and CQC
Claimant sent further details to employer and reported concerns to the Care Quality Commission, stating she was worried for patient safety.
-
Summary dismissal
Claimant was called to an unannounced meeting and summarily dismissed with immediate effect, receiving payment in lieu of notice.
-
Appeal lodged
Claimant appealed against her dismissal.
-
Claim presented to tribunal
Claimant presented a claim for automatic unfair dismissal due to protected disclosures and applied for interim relief.
-
Appeal hearing
Appeal hearing took place; the reason given for dismissal was 'irrevocable breakdown in relationship' with colleagues.
-
Interim relief hearing (part 1)
First day of the interim relief hearing; oral submissions made and documents considered.
-
Interim relief hearing (part 2) and judgment
Second day of hearing; judgment refusing interim relief was given orally.
-
Written judgment sent
Written judgment and reasons were sent to the parties.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the dispenser had a 'pretty good chance' of succeeding at a final hearing in showing that the reason for her dismissal was that she made a protected disclosure about patient safety, so as to warrant interim relief (reinstatement or re-engagement pending the full hearing).
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the application for interim relief.
The key reason was that, on the evidence available at this early stage, the dispenser did not meet the 'pretty good chance' test required for interim relief. The tribunal noted that the respondent had given a different reason for dismissal (irrevocable breakdown in relationships) and that the outcome of a full hearing was uncertain.
No compensation was awarded as this was an interim relief application only.
Lessons & takeaways
- Interim relief is an emergency remedy with a high threshold — you must show a 'pretty good chance' of winning at the final hearing, not just a plausible claim.
- If you raise whistleblowing concerns, keep clear records of what you said, to whom, and when, as this will be crucial evidence.
- The employer's stated reason for dismissal (e.g., relationship breakdown) will be closely scrutinised, but at the interim stage the tribunal will not weigh evidence in depth.
- Act quickly — interim relief applications must be made within seven days of dismissal, and the hearing is usually listed within days.
A dispenser's patient safety concerns lead to dismissal
A part-time dispenser at a GP surgery raised serious concerns about medication mix-ups and possible sabotage, reporting them to her employer and the Care Quality Commission. Within weeks, she was summarily dismissed. She claimed automatic unfair dismissal for whistleblowing and applied for interim relief — a fast-track remedy that could have reinstated her while her case was pending.
Why interim relief was refused
The tribunal applied the 'pretty good chance' test, which is a high bar. It looked at the evidence available at this early stage and found that the dispenser had not shown she was likely to succeed at a full hearing. The employer argued that the dismissal was due to an irrevocable breakdown in working relationships, not the disclosures. Without hearing oral evidence or testing the facts, the tribunal could not conclude that whistleblowing was the real reason.
What this means for similar claims
Interim relief is a powerful but rarely granted remedy. It is designed for cases where the employee's case is so strong that it would be unjust to let the dismissal stand pending a full hearing. This case shows that even where an employee has raised genuine patient safety concerns, the tribunal will not grant interim relief if the employer has a plausible alternative explanation. The dispenser's claim for unfair dismissal will still proceed to a full hearing, but she will not be reinstated in the meantime.
For employees considering whistleblowing claims, this case highlights the importance of gathering evidence early and understanding that interim relief is an exceptional remedy, not a routine step.
Similar cases
Interim relief refused: redundancy decision made before protected disclosures
A senior contracts attorney lost her bid for interim relief after the tribunal found her redundancy was decided before she made protected disclosures about sanctions risks. The claim was dismissed.
Furniture installer dismissed after raising phone mount safety concern: interim relief revoked
A furniture installer who was dismissed shortly after asking for a phone mount and charger to navigate safely lost his unfair dismissal claim when the tribunal revoked an earlier interim relief order and later dismissed the case.
Short-service whistleblower fails to win interim relief after dismissal for unauthorised absence
A machine tool maintenance technician with 11 months' service was refused interim relief after being dismissed for unauthorised absence. The tribunal found he did not have a 'pretty good chance' of proving his whistleblowing claim, but allowed the case to proceed to a full hearing.
Interim relief refused for SHEQ Advisor dismissed after raising fire safety concerns
An employment tribunal refused interim relief to a probationary SHEQ Advisor who claimed she was automatically unfairly dismissed for raising fire safety concerns. The tribunal found she did not have a pretty good chance of proving the email was the principal reason for her dismissal.