Incomprehensible claim struck out: tribunal cannot proceed without a clear case
A former employee's claim against Stanhay Webb Ltd was struck out because the claim form was incomprehensible and the claimant failed to clarify it, even after being given a chance.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #incomprehensible-claim
- #strike-out
- #no-reasonable-prospect
- #language-barrier
- #foreign-language-evidence
Key facts
- The claimant's claim form was incomprehensible and set out no basis for any claim.
- The claimant submitted messages in a foreign language without translation.
- The claimant did not clarify the claim despite being given an opportunity.
- The Tribunal found that a fair trial was not possible due to the incomprehensible claim.
- The claim was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
Timeline
-
Preliminary indication
Employment Judge Adkinson indicated that the claim might be struck out as incomprehensible and gave the claimant 7 days to respond.
-
Claimant's response
The claimant objected but did not clarify the claims; submitted phone messages in a foreign language without translation.
-
Strike out judgment
Employment Judge Adkinson struck out the entire claim as having no reasonable prospect of success.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether to strike out a claim that was so unclear that neither the employer nor the tribunal could understand what it was about.
The outcome
The tribunal struck out the entire claim.
The key reason was that the claim form made no sense, even after the claimant was given an opportunity to clarify. The claimant submitted phone messages in a foreign language without translation, which did not help.
No compensation was awarded because the claim was dismissed at the outset.
Lessons & takeaways
- Your claim form must be in English and set out the basis of your claim clearly, even if you are not a native English speaker.
- If the tribunal gives you a chance to clarify an unclear claim, you must provide a clear explanation in English, not just more documents in a foreign language.
- Tribunals will not construct a case for you; you must explain what happened and why you think it was unfair or discriminatory.
- If your claim is incomprehensible, it will be struck out early, saving time and costs for all parties.
This case shows the importance of presenting a clear and understandable claim to the employment tribunal. The former employee's claim against Stanhay Webb Ltd was struck out because the claim form was incomprehensible. Even after the judge gave a warning and a chance to clarify, the employee sent phone messages in a foreign language without translation, which did not help.
What went wrong
The tribunal acknowledged that English was not the employee's first language, but stressed that the claim must be presented in English and be understandable. The claim form is not just a starting point; it must allow the tribunal and the respondent to see what is actually in dispute. Here, the claim set out no basis for any of the ticked boxes, and the employee did not take the opportunity to explain.
Why the result matters
The tribunal considered whether to hold a preliminary hearing to clarify the claim, but decided against it. The judge noted that such a hearing would require the tribunal to effectively construct the case for the employee, which goes beyond assistance and would be an unfair use of resources. This case is a reminder that while tribunals are flexible, they cannot proceed if the claim is so unclear that a fair trial is impossible.
For anyone considering a claim, the lesson is clear: your claim form must be in English and set out the facts you rely on. If you need help, seek advice or use translation services before submitting. Otherwise, your claim may be struck out before it even begins.
Similar cases
Sanctions law prevented maternity pay: dismissal claim struck out
A housekeeping assistant's unfair dismissal claim was struck out because UK sanctions on the company's owner made it illegal to pay her. The tribunal said the claim had no reasonable prospect of success.
HGV driver dismissed for watching YouTube videos while driving: claim struck out
An HGV driver with 10 years' service was dismissed for gross misconduct after a member of the public complained he was watching videos on his phone while driving. The tribunal struck out his unfair dismissal claim as having no reasonable prospect of success.
Strike-out for deaf former employee who tried to add new claims late
A tribunal struck out a deaf former employee's disability discrimination claim after she failed to comply with directions and attempted to add new claims that went beyond her original ET1.
Self-employed surveyor's employment claim struck out: no reasonable prospect of success
A chartered surveyor who worked for Clements Agency Limited for nearly 30 years on a self-employed basis had his claim for unfair dismissal and discrimination struck out. The tribunal found he had no reasonable prospect of proving he was an employee.
