Foster carer's unfair dismissal claim struck out: no employment contract
A foster carer who claimed unfair dismissal after being deregistered by Blackpool Council had his case struck out. The tribunal ruled that foster carers are not employees under established case law.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #foster-carer
- #employee-status
- #strike-out
- #no-reasonable-prospects
- #w-v-essex
Key facts
- The claimant was a foster carer for Blackpool Council from August 2012, registered from 26 March 2013.
- The claimant was deregistered in January 2022 following a breakdown in relationships.
- The claimant claimed he was an employee and entitled to employee rights, including unfair dismissal.
- The respondent argued foster carers are not employees or workers, relying on W v Essex County Council.
- The claimant accidentally ticked a box for religion or belief discrimination but did not pursue it.
- The tribunal struck out the claims as having no reasonable prospects of success.
Timeline
-
Became foster carer
The claimant started as a foster carer for Blackpool Council.
-
Registered as foster carer
The claimant became registered as a foster carer.
-
Deregistered
The claimant was deregistered as a foster carer in January 2022.
-
Hearing
The preliminary hearing was held via cloud video platform to consider strike out.
-
Judgment issued
Employment Judge Sharkett struck out the claims as having no reasonable prospects of success.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the foster carer's claims had any reasonable prospect of success, given the established legal principle that foster carers are not employees or workers of the local authority.
The outcome
The tribunal struck out all claims as having no reasonable prospects of success.
The key reason was that the relationship between a foster carer and a local authority is governed by the Fostering Services Regulations 2002, not by a contract of employment. The tribunal was bound by the Court of Appeal decision in W v Essex County Council, which held that foster carers are not employees or workers.
The claimant argued that societal changes should lead to a different conclusion, but the tribunal found no cogent evidence to depart from the precedent.
Lessons & takeaways
- If you are a foster carer, you are unlikely to be considered an employee of the local authority, so you cannot bring an unfair dismissal claim.
- The legal status of foster carers is governed by statute and established case law, not by the day-to-day realities of the role.
- If you believe you have been treated unfairly as a foster carer, the appropriate remedy may be judicial review rather than an employment tribunal claim.
- Before bringing a claim, check whether you have employee or worker status — many roles, including foster carers, are explicitly excluded.
- Accidentally ticking a discrimination box on a claim form can complicate proceedings; ensure your claim is accurate from the start.
Foster carer status: a legal dead end
This case illustrates a fundamental barrier that many workers face when trying to bring employment claims: the question of legal status. The claimant, a foster carer for Blackpool Council since 2012, was deregistered in January 2022 after a breakdown in relationships. He felt he had been badly treated and brought claims for unfair dismissal and other rights, believing he was an employee.
However, the law is clear. The Court of Appeal in W v Essex County Council established that foster carers are not employees or workers of the local authority. The relationship is governed by the Fostering Services Regulations 2002, which set out a statutory scheme rather than a contract of service. The tribunal noted that while foster carers are not self-employed in the ordinary sense, they are also not employed under a contract of service.
What could have been done differently?
The claimant argued that society has changed since the W v Essex decision, pointing to greater protections for workers in other areas. But the tribunal found no evidence to justify departing from the binding precedent. The claimant's strong feelings about being treated unfairly could not overcome the legal reality. A more appropriate route might have been a judicial review of the deregistration decision, rather than an employment claim.
Why this matters
For anyone considering an employment tribunal claim, the first question must always be: am I an employee or a worker? Many roles — including foster carers, volunteers, and some contractors — fall outside the protection of employment law. This case is a reminder that even if you feel like an employee, the legal definition may not match your experience. Checking your status with legal advice before issuing a claim can save time, cost, and disappointment.
Similar cases
Founder's unfair dismissal claim struck out: no continuous employment before TUPE transfer
A former CEO who founded the business could not show he was an employee of the transferor company, so his unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of continuous service.
Whistleblowing claim struck out: when the disclosure comes too late
Two warehouse operatives had their automatic unfair dismissal claims for whistleblowing struck out because the alleged breaches happened before they made their protected disclosure. The tribunal said the claims had no reasonable prospects of success.
Race discrimination claim partly struck out: third-party motive not enough
A tribunal struck out one part of a former employee's race discrimination claim because the alleged discriminatory act was carried out by a third party, but allowed other allegations to proceed.
Claim struck out: no employment relationship with Financial Ombudsman Service
A former complainant who claimed to be an employee of the Financial Ombudsman Service had all his claims struck out after failing to attend a preliminary hearing and providing no evidence of an employment relationship.
