Nursery worker dismissed over fabricated alcohol allegation: no investigation, no appeal
A senior nursery practitioner was unfairly dismissed after her employer fabricated an allegation that she was under the influence of alcohol at work. The Watford tribunal awarded £5,325.75, including a 25% Acas uplift for ignoring the code of practice.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #fabricated-allegations
- #alcohol-allegation
- #acas-code-uplift
- #summary-dismissal
- #no-investigation
- #failure-to-follow-procedure
Key facts
- The claimant gave notice on 20 September 2021 with a three-month notice period ending 22 December 2021.
- On 15 October 2021, the claimant was summarily dismissed for alleged gross misconduct.
- The respondent alleged the claimant was under the influence of alcohol at work, but the tribunal found this allegation was fabricated.
- The respondent did not carry out any proper investigation or follow the Acas Code of Practice.
- The claimant's appeal against dismissal was ignored by the respondent.
- The respondent gave negative references to a prospective employer, causing a job offer to be withdrawn.
Timeline
-
Employment commenced
Claimant started work as a nursery practitioner, later promoted to Senior Nursery Practitioner.
-
Claimant gave notice
Claimant gave three months' notice, with last day initially 20 December 2021, later extended to 22 December 2021.
-
Duties restricted
Claimant was told not to respond to parental comments on the app or answer the telephone, without explanation.
-
Summary dismissal
Claimant was called to a meeting with director Mr Luthra and summarily dismissed for alleged gross misconduct, including being under the influence of alcohol.
-
Claimant appealed
Claimant emailed an appeal against dismissal, which was never acknowledged or answered.
-
Tribunal hearing began
Three-day hearing at Watford Employment Tribunal.
-
Judgment given
Tribunal found unfair dismissal and awarded £5,325.75 including 25% Acas uplift.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer had a genuine belief in the alleged misconduct, whether it carried out a reasonable investigation, and whether dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses — and also whether the Acas Code of Practice had been followed.
The outcome
The tribunal found that Swans Day Nurseries Ltd unfairly dismissed the senior nursery practitioner. The employer alleged the claimant was under the influence of alcohol at work, but the tribunal concluded this allegation was fabricated. No proper investigation was carried out, and the claimant's appeal was ignored.
Compensation:
- Basic award: £1,215.00
- Compensatory award: £3,807.00
- 25% Acas uplift for failure to follow the Code: applied to the compensatory award
- Total: £5,325.75
Lessons & takeaways
- Employers must carry out a reasonable investigation before dismissing for misconduct — a single meeting without evidence is not enough.
- Ignoring an employee's appeal is a clear breach of the Acas Code and can lead to an uplift in compensation of up to 25%.
- Fabricating allegations is a serious red flag: tribunals will scrutinise the employer's evidence and may find the dismissal unfair on both procedural and substantive grounds.
- Even employees with short service (under 2 years) can bring unfair dismissal claims if the reason is automatically unfair, but here the claimant had over 3 years' service so the usual qualifying period was met.
This case shows what can happen when an employer acts on a whim rather than following proper procedure. The senior nursery practitioner had given notice and was working out her three-month notice period when she was called into a meeting and summarily dismissed. The employer alleged she was under the influence of alcohol at work — but the tribunal found this was a fabrication.
What went wrong
The employer did not carry out any investigation. There was no attempt to gather evidence, speak to witnesses, or give the employee a chance to respond to the allegations before the decision to dismiss was made. The director who decided to dismiss relied on a written statement from the nursery manager, but the manager was not called to give evidence, so the tribunal gave that statement little weight. The employer also ignored the employee's appeal — she sent an email on 21 October 2021, but never received a reply.
The tribunal noted that the employer failed to follow the Acas Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures. The Code requires employers to investigate, hold a fair meeting, allow the employee to be accompanied, and consider an appeal. Here, none of those steps were taken.
Why the result matters
This case is a reminder that the duty to act fairly does not end when an employee hands in their notice. The claimant was still employed and entitled to be treated properly. The 25% uplift for ignoring the Acas Code sends a clear message: employers who cut corners risk paying significantly more in compensation.
For employees, the case also highlights the importance of keeping a record of events. The claimant was able to show that the alcohol allegation was fabricated, and that her appeal was sent but never acknowledged. That evidence was crucial in persuading the tribunal that the dismissal was unfair.
Similar cases
Managing director dismissed without investigation: unfair dismissal win after High Court ruling
A managing director who was dismissed for alleged threats and misappropriation of funds without any investigation has been awarded £53,212.50 after the tribunal found the dismissal unfair. The High Court had previously found no evidence of fraud or dishonesty.
Senior managers dismissed without investigation: unfair and wrongful dismissal
Five senior managers were summarily dismissed for gross misconduct without any investigation or appeal. The tribunal found the dismissals unfair and wrongful, and awarded unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.
Security officer dismissed by email without hearing: unfair but 100% contributory conduct
A tribunal found that a security officer with 13 years' service was unfairly dismissed after being sacked by email without any disciplinary hearing, but reduced her compensation to zero because her own conduct contributed entirely to the dismissal.
30-year employee dismissed for gross misconduct without any disciplinary procedure: unfair dismissal
A tribunal found that Dunwood Specialties Limited unfairly dismissed a long-serving employee after failing to follow any disciplinary process, but reduced compensation by 80% because the employee would likely have been dismissed anyway.
