Former employee's claim dismissed after hanging up on tribunal clerk
A former employee who hung up on the tribunal clerk and ignored repeated attempts to contact her had her unfair dismissal claim thrown out for non-attendance.
2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #non-attendance
- #dismissal-for-failure-to-attend
- #case-management-hearing
- #video-hearing
Key facts
- The claimant did not attend the hearing on 9 March 2023.
- The claimant hung up when the clerk asked her to join the hearing.
- The claimant ignored subsequent phone calls and emails from the tribunal.
- The claimant had not been actively pursuing her claim and had not responded to the respondent's requests.
- The tribunal made every reasonable attempt to contact the claimant before proceeding in her absence.
Timeline
-
Case listed for preliminary hearing
The tribunal listed the case for a case management preliminary hearing on 9 March 2023 and sent notice to both parties.
-
Hearing start time changed
The tribunal changed the start time of the hearing to 2.15pm and notified the parties by email.
-
Hearing converted to video
The tribunal converted the hearing from telephone to video (CVP) and sent joining instructions by email.
-
Claimant contacted by clerk
At 14.20, the clerk telephoned the claimant. The claimant answered but hung up when asked to join the hearing.
-
Warning sent to claimant
The clerk emailed and left a voicemail warning the claimant that the hearing would proceed in her absence if she did not join by 14:30.
-
Claimant contacted tribunal about link
The claimant telephoned the tribunal saying she did not have the link; the clerk re-sent the joining instructions, but the claimant did not join.
-
Hearing started at 14:40
The employment judge waited until 14:40 before starting the hearing. The claimant did not join.
-
Claim dismissed for non-attendance
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for non-attendance under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The legal issue
Whether the tribunal should dismiss a claim when the claimant fails to attend a case management hearing, despite reasonable efforts by the tribunal to contact her and warn her of the consequences.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the former employee's unfair dismissal claim for non-attendance under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The key reasons were:
- The claimant hung up when the clerk asked her to join the video hearing.
- She ignored subsequent phone calls, emails, and a voicemail warning that the hearing would proceed in her absence.
- She had not been actively pursuing her claim and had not responded to the respondent's requests for clarification.
No compensation was awarded as the claim was dismissed.
Lessons & takeaways
- If you have a tribunal hearing, make sure you have the correct joining link and test it beforehand.
- Ignoring tribunal communications or hanging up on the clerk will likely result in your claim being dismissed.
- Actively pursue your claim by responding to requests from the tribunal and the other side.
- If you cannot attend a hearing, ask for a postponement in advance rather than ignoring it.
This case shows how quickly a claim can unravel if a claimant fails to engage with the tribunal process. The former employee had brought an unfair dismissal claim against her employer, but when it came to a case management hearing, she simply did not join. When the clerk telephoned her, she hung up. She ignored emails and a voicemail warning that the hearing would go ahead without her. She even called the tribunal to say she did not have the link, but when the link was resent, she still did not join.
What the tribunal did
The employment judge waited an extra 20 minutes before starting the hearing. The clerk made repeated attempts to contact the claimant, including sending a warning that a judgment could be made against her. Despite all this, the claimant did not appear or explain her absence. The judge decided that proceeding in her absence would not help because the claim was unclear and needed the claimant's input to clarify the issues. Instead, he dismissed the claim for non-attendance.
What could have been done differently
The claimant could have joined the hearing on time, or at least explained why she could not. If she had technical difficulties, she could have asked for help rather than hanging up. The tribunal gave her every chance, but she chose not to take it. The respondent's solicitor noted that the claimant had not been actively pursuing the claim, which made the dismissal more straightforward.
Why this matters
For anyone considering an employment tribunal claim, this case is a reminder that the process requires active participation. Ignoring hearings or communications from the tribunal can lead to your claim being struck out, regardless of its merits. If you have a hearing, make sure you have the correct link, test it in advance, and contact the tribunal immediately if you have problems. If you cannot attend, ask for a postponement. The tribunal will often be understanding, but only if you communicate with them.
Similar cases
Claim dismissed after employee fails to attend case management hearing
A former employee's unfair dismissal claim was thrown out after she failed to attend a preliminary hearing, despite being warned that the hearing would proceed in her absence.
Former employee's unfair dismissal claim thrown out after failing to attend hearing
A former employee's unfair dismissal claim against Slough Borough Council was dismissed after she and her representative failed to attend the final hearing, despite multiple attempts by the tribunal to contact them.
Former employee ordered to pay £9,992 after failing to attend tribunal hearing
A former employee who failed to attend his own unfair dismissal hearing and ignored tribunal orders has been ordered to pay the Department for Work and Pensions nearly £10,000 in costs.
Claim dismissed after former employee fails to attend third final hearing
An employment tribunal dismissed a former employee's unfair dismissal claim after he failed to attend the final hearing for the third time and had not engaged with the claim for over a year.
