Dismissed the day after a share transfer: no procedure, no written particulars
An employee with three years' service was dismissed on his second day under new ownership, with no warning or consultation. The tribunal awarded £3,767 for unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay, notice pay, and failure to provide written particulars.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #change-in-working-pattern
- #failure-to-provide-written-particulars
- #holiday-pay
- #notice-pay
- #small-business
Key facts
- The claimant was employed from 8 September 2017 until 26 January 2021.
- The claimant worked 24 hours per week over three days.
- On 26 January 2021, the new director told the claimant his hours would change and he was not entitled to any hours.
- The respondent did not provide a written statement of employment particulars.
- The claimant did not take any holiday in the year before dismissal.
- The claimant brought no evidence of mitigation of loss.
Timeline
-
Employment started
The claimant began working for Hazel Grove DIY Centre Limited.
-
Share transfer
Mr Michael Budd purchased the business from Mr Andrew Curry via a share transfer.
-
Dismissal
Mr Budd told the claimant his work pattern would not continue and he was not entitled to any hours. The claimant was dismissed.
-
Claim form received
The claimant submitted claims for unpaid redundancy, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and unlawful deduction from wages.
-
Redundancy claim withdrawn
The claimant withdrew his claim for unpaid redundancy payment.
-
Preliminary hearing
Employment Judge Ficklin held a hearing on TUPE and other preliminary issues.
-
Final hearing (day 1)
The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant, Mr Budd, and Mr Curry.
-
Final hearing (day 2) and judgment
The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded compensation.
-
Reconsideration refused
The claimant's application to reconsider the compensatory award was refused.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employee was unfairly dismissed when the new owner of the business told him his working pattern would change and he was not entitled to any hours, without any consultation or notice.
The outcome
The tribunal found the employee was unfairly dismissed. The new director's conduct amounted to a dismissal without any fair procedure.
The employee was awarded:
- Basic award: £576 (3 weeks' gross pay)
- Compensatory award: £1,156 (4 weeks' net pay plus £400 for loss of statutory rights)
- Wrongful dismissal (notice pay): £576 (3 weeks' gross pay)
- Unpaid holiday pay: £1,075.20 (5.6 weeks' gross pay)
- Failure to provide written particulars: £384 (2 weeks' gross pay)
- Total: £3,767.20
Lessons & takeaways
- New owners taking over a business should not assume they can change terms or dismiss employees without following a fair process, even if they believe there is a business need.
- Employees who do not receive a written statement of employment particulars within two months can claim up to 4 weeks' pay as a penalty.
- Accrued but untaken holiday pay is a statutory right that must be paid on termination, regardless of the reason for dismissal.
- Even small businesses with limited HR resources must follow basic procedural fairness, including giving warnings and an opportunity to be heard before dismissal.
A sudden change of ownership, a sudden dismissal
This case shows how quickly things can go wrong when a business changes hands and the new owner fails to follow basic employment law. The employee had worked at Hazel Grove DIY Centre for over three years, working 24 hours a week over three days. On 25 January 2021, the business was sold via a share transfer to a new director, Mr Budd. The very next day, Mr Budd told the employee that his working pattern would not continue and that he was not entitled to any hours. The employee was effectively dismissed on the spot, with no notice, no consultation, and no written explanation.
What the employer could have done differently
The employer's main failing was a complete lack of procedure. Even if the new director wanted to change the employee's hours or role, he should have discussed it with the employee, given him a chance to respond, and considered alternatives. A fair process would have involved a meeting, a warning that dismissal was possible, and a right of appeal. Instead, the employee was simply told his hours were gone. The tribunal also noted that the employee had not received a written statement of employment particulars, which is a legal requirement for all employees.
Why this result matters
This case is a reminder that a change of ownership does not give an employer a free pass to dismiss staff without following a fair procedure. The fact that the business was small and the new director was inexperienced did not excuse the lack of process. The compensation awarded—£3,767—reflects the employee's lost earnings, notice pay, holiday pay, and a penalty for the missing written particulars. For employees in similar situations, the key takeaway is that an abrupt dismissal without any process is likely to be unfair, and you may be entitled to compensation even if you have only a few years' service.
Similar cases
Site closure without process: redundancy dismissal ruled unfair
A former employee with three years' service was unfairly dismissed after his site closed and the employer failed to follow any redundancy process. The tribunal awarded over £44,000 in compensation.
Unfair dismissal but 100% Polkey reduction due to workplace closure
A former employee was unfairly dismissed but received only limited compensation because the tribunal found he would have been fairly dismissed a month later when the workplace closed. Total award: £12,419.29.
Constructive dismissal claim fails but holiday pay awarded for cash-in-hand worker
A counter assistant who resigned after receiving a written warning for sickness absence lost her unfair dismissal claim, but was awarded £4,777.50 for unpaid holiday pay over nine years.
TUPE transfer and automatic unfair dismissal: employee wins after asserting statutory rights
A former employee of Plau Bistro Limited was automatically unfairly dismissed after asserting a statutory right following a TUPE transfer. The tribunal awarded £2,396.23 for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.
