Partial win £566 awarded Employment Tribunal · 11 August 2023

Director and employee wins holiday pay but loses constructive dismissal claim

A former director and employee was awarded £566.49 for unpaid holiday leave but failed to prove constructive dismissal after resigning amid trust issues.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed by the respondent from 1 May 2022 until 8 October 2022.
  • Prior to 1 May 2022, the claimant was a self-employed contractor, not an employee or worker.
  • The claimant resigned by email on 8 October 2022, terminating his employment.
  • The claimant was paid £1,000 per month and worked 12-16 hours per week.
  • The claimant was not paid for accrued but untaken annual leave on termination.
  • The respondent accepted liability for holiday pay accrued from 1 May 2022 to 8 October 2022.

Timeline

  1. Claimant began working for respondent

    The claimant started providing services to the respondent's business, initially as a self-employed contractor.

  2. Respondent incorporated

    Purple Dog Company.com Ltd was incorporated with Mr Phillips as sole director and shareholder.

  3. Claimant's IVA cleared

    The claimant's Individual Voluntary Arrangement was cleared, allowing him to become a director.

  4. Everest Base Camp expedition

    The claimant led an expedition to Everest Base Camp; payment of £1,650 was for expenses only.

  5. Claimant became employee and director

    The claimant was put on the respondent's payroll as an employee and appointed as a director, paid £1,000 per month.

  6. Claimant incorporated Rogue Sports Travel Ltd

    The claimant set up a competing company without informing Mr Phillips, intended for his own business.

  7. Meeting between claimant and Mr Phillips

    The claimant and Mr Phillips met to discuss trust issues; the claimant suggested they go separate ways.

  8. Claimant resigned by email

    The claimant sent an email titled 'Terminating our commercial relationship' and ceased all work.

  9. ACAS early conciliation notified

    The claimant notified ACAS of a potential claim, starting the early conciliation process.

  10. Claim presented to tribunal

    The claimant presented his claim to the Employment Tribunal.

The outcome

The tribunal dismissed claims for unfair dismissal, breach of contract (notice pay), and unauthorised deduction from wages.

The claim for holiday pay succeeded in part: the respondent was ordered to pay £566.49 for accrued but untaken annual leave from 1 May 2022 to 8 October 2022.

The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee before 1 May 2022 and that his resignation was not a constructive dismissal.

Lessons & takeaways

  • If you resign and claim constructive dismissal, you must show a fundamental breach of contract by your employer that caused you to leave.
  • Holiday pay is calculated only for periods when you are an employee or worker, not for earlier self-employment.
  • Keep clear records of hours worked if you later claim you were paid below the national minimum wage.
  • Setting up a competing business while still employed can undermine a constructive dismissal claim.

A resignation that wasn't a dismissal

The claimant, a former director and shareholder of Purple Dog Company.com Ltd, resigned by email in October 2022 after a meeting where he suggested the parties go their separate ways. He later argued that he was constructively dismissed, but the tribunal found that his resignation was voluntary. The employer had not breached the implied term of trust and confidence, and the claimant's decision to set up a competing company without telling the respondent was a significant factor.

Holiday pay success

The claimant succeeded in one area: holiday pay. From 1 May 2022, he was an employee and entitled to paid annual leave. The respondent accepted that no holiday had been taken and that payment was due. The tribunal calculated the sum at £566.49, based on the claimant's monthly salary of £1,000 and the period of employment.

What went wrong for the claimant

The claimant's other claims failed largely because of the facts. He had not been an employee before May 2022, so earlier periods did not count. His claim for notice pay failed because he resigned without giving notice. And his claim for unpaid wages (national minimum wage) failed because the tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence that he worked 12-16 hours per week, not 50, meaning his pay was above the minimum.

Key takeaway

This case shows that a director who is also an employee cannot ignore their own conduct when claiming constructive dismissal. The tribunal will look at the whole picture, including whether the employee's own actions contributed to the breakdown of the relationship. For holiday pay, the key is to establish the correct employment status and keep clear records.

Similar cases