Claimant won £36,896 awarded Employment Tribunal · 13 June 2023

Cumulative delays in grievance and capability process led to constructive dismissal

A facilities maintenance engineer resigned after repeated delays in his capability and grievance processes. The tribunal found a cumulative breach of trust and confidence and awarded £36,896.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • Mr Gore resigned on 28 February 2022 after a capability process and grievance process with repeated delays.
  • The capability process was initiated by Mr Riley without prior informal management discussions.
  • The grievance process was delayed at every stage: initial grievance, appeal, and further questions.
  • The final straw was Mr Burnett's delay in responding to further questions until 10 February 2022.
  • The tribunal found a cumulative breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.
  • The claimant was awarded £36,896.00 including a 15% uplift for failure to follow the ACAS Code.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    Mr Gore commenced employment as a Facilities Maintenance Engineer.

  2. Stress letter sent

    Mr Gore sent a letter to Mr Riley citing stress due to workload.

  3. Meeting about performance

    Mr Riley raised concerns about Mr Gore's work; voices were raised.

  4. Capability process initiated

    Mr Riley invited Mr Gore to a preliminary capability meeting.

  5. Preliminary capability meeting

    Meeting held; Mr Gore supported by Mr Wingfield who covertly recorded it.

  6. Grievance submitted

    Mr Gore submitted a grievance against Mr Riley for bullying and harassment.

  7. Grievance outcome

    Mr Corrin rejected the grievance without interviewing Mr Gore.

  8. Appeal submitted

    Mr Gore appealed the grievance outcome.

  9. Appeal outcome

    Mr Martlew upheld the original grievance decision after delays.

  10. Response to further questions

    Mr Burnett finally responded to Mr Gore's further questions after delays.

  11. Resignation

    Mr Gore resigned, citing a complete breakdown in trust and confidence.

The outcome

The tribunal upheld the claim of constructive unfair dismissal.

The key reasons were:

  • The capability process was initiated without prior informal discussions.
  • The grievance process was delayed at every stage: 12 weeks for the initial outcome, 15 weeks for the appeal, and further delays in responding to follow-up questions.
  • The final straw was a delayed response to further questions, which led the claimant to resign.
  • The respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice, resulting in a 15% uplift.

Compensation:

  • Basic award: £4,896
  • Compensatory award: £32,000
  • Total: £36,896 (including ACAS uplift)

Lessons & takeaways

  • If you are considering resigning due to your employer's conduct, keep a clear record of each incident and how it affects your trust in them.
  • Employers should handle grievances and capability processes promptly; repeated delays can be seen as a breach of trust.
  • A single 'last straw' event can be the final step in a series of actions that together justify constructive dismissal.
  • Failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice can increase compensation by up to 25%.

When delays become a breach of trust

This case shows how a series of delays in internal processes can cumulatively destroy the trust and confidence an employee has in their employer. The claimant, a facilities maintenance engineer with six years' service, was subjected to a capability process that began without any informal discussions. When he raised a grievance about his manager's conduct, the process was delayed at every stage: it took 12 weeks for the initial outcome, 15 weeks for the appeal, and further delays in responding to follow-up questions. The final straw came when a manager took weeks to reply to further questions, prompting the claimant to resign.

What the employer could have done differently

Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council could have avoided this outcome by following its own policies and the ACAS Code. The capability process should have started with informal discussions. The grievance should have been investigated promptly and fairly, including interviewing the claimant. The appeal should have been dealt with in a reasonable time. Instead, the cumulative delays led the tribunal to find a fundamental breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.

Why this matters for similar claims

This case is a reminder that constructive dismissal can arise from a pattern of behaviour rather than a single dramatic event. Employees who feel their trust has been eroded by repeated failures should document each incident and consider whether the final act is the 'last straw'. For employers, the message is clear: delays in handling grievances and capability issues can be costly, especially when the ACAS Code is ignored, leading to an uplift in compensation.

Similar cases