School employee's unfair dismissal claim dismissed as tribunal lacked jurisdiction due to time limit breach
A school employee with 16 years' service who applied for voluntary redundancy had her unfair dismissal claim thrown out because she presented it over three months after the statutory time limit expired. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for her to have claimed in time.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #long-term-sickness
- #voluntary-redundancy
- #adviser-mistake
- #time-limit
- #jurisdiction
Key facts
- The claimant was on sick leave from mid-2018 for over two years.
- She applied for voluntary redundancy on 5 February 2021 and her employment ended on 31 March 2021.
- She presented her claim to the tribunal on 13 October 2021, over three months after the time limit expired.
- The claimant relied on incorrect advice from her consultant about the time limit.
- The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for her to present the claim in time.
- The amendment to add a disability discrimination claim was refused as it was out of time and lacked merit.
Timeline
-
Sick leave started
The claimant began a period of long-term sickness absence from mid-2018, continuing for over two years.
-
Consultation meeting
The claimant attended a meeting at the school regarding a staff restructure and redundancy process.
-
Phased return to work
The claimant returned to work on a phased return, but was later off sick with COVID-19 from 23 February to 26 March 2021.
-
Applied for voluntary redundancy
The claimant applied for voluntary redundancy, which was accepted by the school.
-
Redundancy acceptance letter
The school sent a letter confirming acceptance of voluntary redundancy and stating the last day of service as 31 March 2021.
-
Effective date of termination
The claimant's employment ended by notice, with the effective date of termination being 31 March 2021.
-
Redundancy payment received
The claimant received a single redundancy payment of £8,451.
-
Notice pay received
The claimant received a payment of £5,117.16 representing 12 weeks' notice pay.
-
ACAS early conciliation started
The claimant started the ACAS early conciliation process, which concluded on 10 September 2021.
-
Claim presented to tribunal
The claimant presented her claim to the Employment Tribunal, which was out of time for all claims.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether it could hear claims for unfair dismissal, unlawful deductions, and breach of contract that were presented outside the statutory time limits, and whether to allow an amendment to add a disability discrimination claim.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all claims because they were presented too late.
- The claimant's employment ended on 31 March 2021, giving her until 30 June 2021 to claim unfair dismissal. She started ACAS early conciliation on 30 July 2021 and presented her claim on 13 October 2021.
- The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for her to have presented the claim in time. The fact that her consultant gave incorrect advice about the time limit did not make it not reasonably practicable.
- The application to amend to add a disability discrimination claim was also refused as it was out of time and lacked merit.
- No compensation was awarded as the claims were dismissed.
Lessons & takeaways
- The time limit for unfair dismissal claims is three months minus one day from the effective date of termination – missing it by even a day can be fatal.
- Relying on incorrect advice from a consultant or adviser does not automatically extend the time limit – the tribunal will consider whether it was reasonably practicable for you to claim in time.
- If you are unsure about the time limit, seek advice early and consider presenting a claim to protect your position while you gather evidence.
- Voluntary redundancy does not remove your right to claim unfair dismissal, but you must still act within the time limits.
- An amendment to add a new claim after the time limit has expired will only be allowed if it is in time or arises out of the same facts – and even then, it is at the tribunal's discretion.
A costly delay
This case shows how strict the time limits are for employment tribunal claims. The claimant, a school employee with 16 years' service, applied for voluntary redundancy and her employment ended on 31 March 2021. She then waited until 30 July 2021 to start ACAS early conciliation – over three months after her last day – and did not present her claim until 13 October 2021. By then, the unfair dismissal time limit had expired by more than three months.
The adviser's mistake
The claimant argued that she had relied on incorrect advice from her consultant about the time limit. However, the tribunal found that it was still reasonably practicable for her to have presented the claim in time. The key point is that the test is not whether the claimant knew the correct time limit, but whether it was reasonably practicable for her to comply. The tribunal noted that the claimant was capable of managing her own affairs and could have sought advice earlier or checked the time limit herself.
What the employer did right
The London Borough of Brent followed a proper redundancy process, including consultation and a voluntary redundancy scheme. The claimant applied for voluntary redundancy herself, and the employer accepted. The tribunal did not criticise the employer's actions – the case turned entirely on the time limit issue.
Why this matters
For anyone considering an employment tribunal claim, the message is clear: act quickly. The time limit for unfair dismissal is three months minus one day from the effective date of termination. Even if you are seeking advice, it is safer to present a claim to protect your position while you gather evidence. Relying on an adviser's mistake will rarely excuse a late claim. This case also highlights that voluntary redundancy does not waive your right to claim – but you must still meet the deadlines.
Similar cases
Dismissed during long-term sick leave: claims thrown out for missing tribunal deadlines
A production operative with 13 years' service was dismissed for capability due to ill health after a telephone meeting. Most of her claims were struck out as out of time, but one disability discrimination claim will proceed.
Long-serving employee dismissed during sickness absence: claim thrown out for being too late
A tribunal dismissed unfair dismissal and wage claims from a CSS General with 20 years' service because he waited over five months to contact ACAS, even though he continued to receive salary after dismissal.
Supermarket assistant dismissed after 2.5 years sick leave: claim thrown out for lateness and non-attendance
A supermarket assistant who was dismissed after nearly two and a half years of sickness absence had his unfair dismissal claim rejected because he presented it too late and failed to attend the preliminary hearing.
Online delivery driver's unfair dismissal claim thrown out for being too late
A Sainsbury's delivery driver who claimed he was unfairly dismissed for discount card misuse had his case dismissed because he presented his claim two months after the deadline.
