Partial win £8,308 awarded Employment Tribunal · 21 July 2021

Fire Brigades Union official unfairly dismissed for pro-Brexit rally speech

A full-time union official was unfairly dismissed by the Fire Brigades Union after speaking at a Leave Means Leave rally. The tribunal awarded £8,308.45 in compensation.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was a full-time union official employed by the Fire Brigades Union.
  • The claimant held a genuine philosophical belief in national independence and campaigned for Brexit.
  • The claimant spoke at a Leave Means Leave rally on 29 March 2019, introduced as a trade unionist, not an FBU official.
  • The FBU disciplinary panel upheld charges related to breaching conference policy and acting prejudicially, leading to a two-year ban from office.
  • The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because the investigation was flawed and the decision was not within the range of reasonable responses.
  • The tribunal held that the claimant's philosophical belief was protected but was not the reason for dismissal.

Timeline

  1. Employment as firefighter

    Claimant employed as a firefighter with London Fire Brigade.

  2. Elected as regional official

    Claimant elected as Regional Official for the London region of the FBU.

  3. Full-time release to union work

    Claimant released from firefighting duties to work full-time for the FBU.

  4. Elected to Executive Council

    Claimant elected as FBU Executive Council Member for London.

  5. Speech at Leave Means Leave rally

    Claimant spoke at a pro-Brexit rally in Parliament Square, introduced as National Organiser for Trade Unions Against the EU.

  6. Investigation initiated

    Claimant informed that a complaint had been received and an investigation would be conducted.

  7. Investigation interview

    Claimant attended an investigation interview with Vice President Mr Noble.

  8. Disciplinary charges notified

    Claimant received letter detailing six disciplinary charges.

  9. Disciplinary hearing

    Executive Council hearing upheld three charges and imposed a two-year ban from holding office.

  10. Appeal hearing

    Recall Conference at Blackpool dismissed the claimant's appeal.

The outcome

The tribunal found that the claimant was an employee of the Fire Brigades Union and that his dismissal was unfair. The reason for dismissal was conduct, not his philosophical belief, so the discrimination claim failed. Compensation of £8,308.45 was awarded for unfair dismissal.

  • Basic award: not separately stated
  • Compensatory award: not separately stated
  • Polkey reduction: not applied
  • Contributory fault: not applied

Lessons & takeaways

  • If you hold a philosophical belief, ensure it is genuinely held and cogent to gain protection under the Equality Act 2010.
  • Employers must conduct a thorough investigation before dismissing for conduct; a flawed process can make the dismissal unfair.
  • Being an elected union official does not automatically mean you are not an employee; the nature of the working relationship is key.
  • Speaking at a rally in a personal capacity does not necessarily give an employer grounds for dismissal if it does not conflict with your duties.

When a union official's personal views lead to dismissal

This case highlights the risks for employees who express strong political opinions outside of work. The claimant, a full-time union official with the Fire Brigades Union, spoke at a Leave Means Leave rally in March 2019. He was introduced as a trade unionist, not as an FBU representative. The FBU investigated and dismissed him for breaching conference policy and acting prejudicially.

The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because the investigation was flawed. The employer did not properly consider the context of the speech or the claimant's explanation. The decision to dismiss was not within the range of reasonable responses that a reasonable employer would have made.

What the employer could have done differently

The FBU could have conducted a more balanced investigation, including speaking to witnesses and considering the claimant's long service and clean disciplinary record. They might also have considered a lesser sanction, such as a warning, rather than dismissal. The tribunal noted that the claimant's philosophical belief in national independence was genuine and protected, but it was not the reason for his dismissal.

Why this matters for similar claims

This case shows that even union officials can be employees and entitled to unfair dismissal rights. It also demonstrates that expressing a protected philosophical belief does not automatically make a dismissal discriminatory if the employer's reason is conduct. However, a flawed process can still lead to a finding of unfair dismissal. Employees should be aware that their off-duty conduct can still have consequences if it conflicts with their employer's policies.

Similar cases